- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:26 am to John Barron
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:26 am to John Barron
Connections to Russia
Bowes addressed the UN Security Council at Russia's invitation in 29 June 2023.[16] He was introduced as a "scholar specialising in small arms and munitions" and criticized NATO's role in the Russo-Ukrainian war.[2] He described the war as a NATO-driven proxy conflict, warning of unregulated arms flooding into Ukraine.[2] Russia defended Bowes, while Ukraine's ambassador dismissed him as a "Russian stooge".[2] His UN appearance was part of Russia's effort to shift blame for the war onto the West.[2]
Bowes has worked for the Russian state media network RT, and portrays the West as the antagonist in Russia's war on Ukraine. His views, aligned with Kremlin viewpoints, positions him as a key figure in disseminating pro-Russian narratives.[1][17] Following the invasion of the Kursk Oblast by Ukrainian troops, Bowes described it as "Ukraines last ditch roll of the Dice". He also said that the invasion by the "corrupt Kiev elites" was ordered by "their masters in London and Washington".[18]
Bowes lives in Russia.[1]
Bowes addressed the UN Security Council at Russia's invitation in 29 June 2023.[16] He was introduced as a "scholar specialising in small arms and munitions" and criticized NATO's role in the Russo-Ukrainian war.[2] He described the war as a NATO-driven proxy conflict, warning of unregulated arms flooding into Ukraine.[2] Russia defended Bowes, while Ukraine's ambassador dismissed him as a "Russian stooge".[2] His UN appearance was part of Russia's effort to shift blame for the war onto the West.[2]
Bowes has worked for the Russian state media network RT, and portrays the West as the antagonist in Russia's war on Ukraine. His views, aligned with Kremlin viewpoints, positions him as a key figure in disseminating pro-Russian narratives.[1][17] Following the invasion of the Kursk Oblast by Ukrainian troops, Bowes described it as "Ukraines last ditch roll of the Dice". He also said that the invasion by the "corrupt Kiev elites" was ordered by "their masters in London and Washington".[18]
Bowes lives in Russia.[1]
0
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:27 am to Chromdome35
quote:
you need to understand how advanced the Russian troll farms are.
First you tried to convince everyone the Oreshnik Missile Strikes were Reverse launch videos and now you are trying to convince everyone Russian Troll Farms are posting here.
You are going to join GOP in the psych facility. You might need 6 months of Multiple modalities of psychological treatment to help you Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:30 am to GOP_Tiger
The answer Sounds familiar
quote:
I asked ChatGPT how to tell if an account is a bot:
This post was edited on 1/25/25 at 11:36 am
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:34 am to John Barron
Son, I'm really disappointed in how you turned out, your mother and I had such high hopes for you. She should have swallowed.
I made one post about the missile strike video and corrected it within the hour after it became known that the Russians only used inert warheads on the missile. Every time you bring this up as some big gotcha, I think most people just laugh at your lameness.
How many posts have you issued retractions on after it became clear they were wrong???
I made one post about the missile strike video and corrected it within the hour after it became known that the Russians only used inert warheads on the missile. Every time you bring this up as some big gotcha, I think most people just laugh at your lameness.
How many posts have you issued retractions on after it became clear they were wrong???
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:36 am to REG861
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/6/26 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:37 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Ukraine has lost even more territory
Uh, Ukraine controls more Ukrainian territory now than it did in April 2022
Then
Now
This post was edited on 1/25/25 at 11:42 am
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:39 am to John Barron
NAFO Trolls: Yeah Russia is outpacing NATO in defense manufacturing on everything except artillery equipment
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:44 am to John Barron
Oh, and Chay Bowes still lives in Russia....
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 1/25/25 at 11:46 am
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:49 am to John Barron
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:50 am to Chromdome35
Looking at these maps of the lines in April 22 vs today, how can anyone refute the might of the Russian Army. Almost three years later and Russia controls less of Ukraine and has lost a small part of Russia.
Son, when exactly is all this Russian might going to manifest in the real world?
ETA: Maybe since Russia has been run out of Syria, they can use those troops and materials to make a difference in Ukraine for more #russianwinning
Perhaps 2025 will be the year the Russian black sea fleet stops hiding from Ukraine's navy and actually makes a difference in the war.
ETA2: Ukraine's military is in dire condition, manpower shortages, equipment shortages, poor leadership and public apathy are all taking their toll on Ukraine...yet Russia is barely moving forward in very limited locals and can't expell Ukraine from Russia. #morerussianwinning.
Son, when exactly is all this Russian might going to manifest in the real world?
ETA: Maybe since Russia has been run out of Syria, they can use those troops and materials to make a difference in Ukraine for more #russianwinning
Perhaps 2025 will be the year the Russian black sea fleet stops hiding from Ukraine's navy and actually makes a difference in the war.
ETA2: Ukraine's military is in dire condition, manpower shortages, equipment shortages, poor leadership and public apathy are all taking their toll on Ukraine...yet Russia is barely moving forward in very limited locals and can't expell Ukraine from Russia. #morerussianwinning.
This post was edited on 1/25/25 at 11:56 am
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:52 am to John Barron
Posted on 1/25/25 at 11:54 am to John Barron
Posted on 1/25/25 at 12:01 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
I made one post about the missile strike video and corrected it within the hour after it became known that the Russians only used inert warheads on the missile. Every time you bring this up as some big gotcha, I think most people just laugh at your lameness.
I’m confused and maybe you can help me,
This do called super weapon was launched months ago. It did littkd damage because it carried no warhead, but it was designed to scare Ukraine and the West.
Well why haven’t we seen more of these super weapons? I’d suspect that Russia would be sending a multitude of these missiles to wreck key Ukrainian positions and facilities.
Are these real threats, or are is it some sort of bluff?
Posted on 1/25/25 at 12:01 pm to GOP_Tiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/6/26 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 1/25/25 at 12:06 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
The war is effectively over, dude.
When is actually going to end? Do you have a prediction?
Posted on 1/25/25 at 12:08 pm to doubleb
quote:
This do called super weapon was launched months ago. It did littkd damage because it carried no warhead, but it was designed to scare Ukraine and the West.
Well why haven’t we seen more of these super weapons? I’d suspect that Russia would be sending a multitude of these missiles to wreck key Ukrainian positions and facilities.
Are these real threats, or are is it some sort of bluff?
It is plain to see how much of an impact this new superweapon has made on the battlefield. Russia's pace of advance has increased a few meters a day.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 12:18 pm to Chromdome35
For the non-bots here,
Oreshnik is a medium-range ballistic missile. It's accurate enough when carrying a nuke, because it's not necessary to be extremely precise when using a nuke (duh). But Russia already had plenty of ways to hit Ukraine with nukes if it wanted to do that.
For use carrying a conventional warhead, the Oreshnik lacks the precision of, say, Russian cruise missiles. If it can't reliably hit a small target, then what's the point?
In short, Oreshnik has propaganda value, but the reason that Russia hasn't used it again in Ukraine is that it provides very little military value.
Oreshnik is a medium-range ballistic missile. It's accurate enough when carrying a nuke, because it's not necessary to be extremely precise when using a nuke (duh). But Russia already had plenty of ways to hit Ukraine with nukes if it wanted to do that.
For use carrying a conventional warhead, the Oreshnik lacks the precision of, say, Russian cruise missiles. If it can't reliably hit a small target, then what's the point?
In short, Oreshnik has propaganda value, but the reason that Russia hasn't used it again in Ukraine is that it provides very little military value.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 12:22 pm to GOP_Tiger
Exactly.
Russia has been firing nuclear-capable missiles of all types at Ukraine since the start of the war. The Oreshnik is just a more expensive version of what they have already been using, except they didn't even put conventional warheads on it; they just fired it with inert warheads...brilliant strategy.
Russia has been firing nuclear-capable missiles of all types at Ukraine since the start of the war. The Oreshnik is just a more expensive version of what they have already been using, except they didn't even put conventional warheads on it; they just fired it with inert warheads...brilliant strategy.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 12:22 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Umm, that you retards repeatedly insisted that they could throw Russia out of all of Ukraine, including the Donbas and Crimea,
Honestly, who posted this?. Obviously they were wrong.
I’ve seen post after post saying the war is over; yet every day more and more soldiers fight and die. Are they saying it’s over because Ukraine can’t throw Russia out of Ukraine?
In about four weeks the war will be three years old. People have repeatedly says the war is over. Do you believe at this time in 2026 thd two nations will be still fighting? It sure looks that way.
Page 4456 of 5046
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News