Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 10/16/24 at 5:10 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138812 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 5:10 am to
quote:

Russian farmers have already complained that they might breakeven last year. Diesel might have been short for them this year. The export market is not profitable at all gobally per my convo this morning.
Ukraine's grain sector losses could top $3.2 bln due to war

quote:

As for Ukraine it is one of the lowest cost producers of grain in the world. Russia is a very high cost
The Agrarian Council, Ukraine's largest agribusiness group, said the cost of wheat production in 2023 was about $146 a metric ton, with an average selling price of $102. LINK

The cost of grain production in Russia was expected to increase in 2024 to 13,000 RUR/t, primarily due to higher fuel prices, compared to 10,000 RUR/t in 2023. That equates to $134/t / $102/t respectively. LINK
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4669 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 6:40 am to
ISW Update Oct 15

quote:

Key Takeaways:

The Kremlin is likely leveraging the recent June 2024 Russia-North Korea comprehensive strategic partnership agreement in part to offset Russian force generation and border security requirements—further cementing Russian President Vladimir Putin's commitment to avoiding mobilization for as long as possible.

The Kremlin has elected to address the recent controversy regarding its reliance on conscripts to repel Ukraine’s incursion into Kursk Oblast by offering financial incentives to any personnel involved in defending the state border.

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law allowing Russian Investigative Committee Head Alexander Bastrykin to stay in his position despite reaching retirement age (again) demonstrating Putin's continued preference for keeping curated loyalists from his inner circle in positions of power.

Russian forces recently advanced in Kursk Oblast and near Kupyansk, Toretsk, and Pokrovsk.

A former Russian Storm-Z instructor and milblogger heavily criticized Russian forces' reliance on the partially-encrypted communications platform Discord following Russia's recent ban of the platform.


Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
3945 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 6:40 am to
quote:

Unless Ukraine and the West create a serious plan to radically increase aid to support mobilization - where Ukraine commits to mobilizing more people on the condition that they are properly armed and trained, and the West provides robust air defense to intercept missiles as decisively as the U.S. does for Israel - Ukraine will lose the war of attrition. This will force unfavorable peace, and mass migration from Ukraine to other countries, setting a dangerous precedent, and making it look like the West lost to Russia in the eyes of the world, especially among the enemies of the West


yep.

quote:

If Russia retains its occupied territories, it will undermine one of Europe’s core security principles: that borders cannot be redrawn by invading force. In 2014, Russia violated this order, leading to the 2022 invasion. This time, it’s not just Ukraine that will have failed - it’s Ukraine, the U.S., and Western Europe’s failure to defeat Russia.



double yep.

And China is emboldened to move on Taiwan and probably before that outlying Japanese Islands... because borders can be changed just by force...
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 6:52 am to
quote:

Right now, as you very well know, Russia is not interested in a peace deal with anything close to the current front lines. Russia demands much more territory (that it has never held), so it's just dishonest to suggest that Ukraine needs to seek peace.



If their economy was imploding like some on here suggest, they would be more open to it.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 7:02 am to
quote:

making it look like the West lost to Russia in the eyes of the world, especially among the enemies of the West


So, China?

Realistically China is the only "enemy of the West" that the West couldn't easily and decisively annihilate.

I think this conflict is pretty unique with all of the factors at play here, but I'm sure they are learning at least some lessons and adjusting their Taiwan strategy accordingly.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42607 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 7:08 am to
quote:

Right now, as you very well know, Russia is not interested in a peace deal with anything close to the current front lines. Russia demands much more territory (that it has never held), so it's just dishonest to suggest that Ukraine needs to seek peace.


There is no evidence that a peace deal would dictate that the current lines would be codified. That is wishful thinking.
Russia has already stated they want more and then there are the strings that are attached.

It isn’t a good situation, but the notion that all Ukraine has to do is surrender and it’s over is not true.
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5647 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 7:16 am to
President Zelenskyy Unveils Ukraine’s Victory Plan

Oct 16, 2024 12:25
Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy presented his Victory Plan at the Verkhovna Rada on October 16, stressing the end of the war depends on Ukraine’s partners and not on Russia’s leader Vladimir Putin.

The Victory Plan consists of 5 points and 3 secret subpoints.

"If the plan is supported, we can end the war no later than next year," Zelenskyy said. "If we and our partners don't strengthen now, Putin will significantly strengthen next year.”

The President emphasized that Moscow is not interested in peace.

"Russia isn’t seeking an honest peace. Putin only wants war. We must change the circumstances so the war ends regardless of what Putin wants," Zelenskyy said.

The key points from President Zelenskyy’s address are as follows:

Invitation of Ukraine to NATO: Zelenskyy emphasized that Ukraine's invitation to NATO would serve as a "proof of determination" and signal how NATO partners envision Ukraine’s role in the future "security architecture."

Strengthening Defense: This point includes operations in strategic locations to prevent the creation of buffer zones within Ukraine, enhanced anti-aircraft defenses, joint efforts with partners to shoot down Russian aircraft, expanding the use of Ukrainian drones and missiles, removing restrictions on the use of weapons, and providing access to partner intelligence.

Deterrence: Zelenskyy called for the deployment of a comprehensive non-nuclear deterrence package aimed at protecting Ukraine from Russian aggression and limiting Russia's capabilities.

Development of Strategic and Economic Potential: Zelenskyy also highlighted the need to strengthen Ukraine’s strategic and economic potential, as well as intensify sanctions against Russia.

Post-War Contribution to NATO: After the war, the Ukrainian military could apply its experience to bolster NATO and European defense efforts. The President also suggested that Ukrainian forces could eventually replace the U.S. contingent in certain areas.

According to Zelenskyy, the second, third, and fourth points have secret sub-points that are revealed to the US and certain EU countries, including Britain and Italy.

Zelenskyy had planned to unveil his Victory Plan to Ukraine's Western allies during the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting at Germany's Ramstein airbase on October 12. However, the gathering was canceled after US President Joe Biden postponed his overseas travel due to Hurricane Milton.

United24Media


Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 7:18 am to
The peace deal they make today is better than the one they’ll make in a month, six months, or a year.

Fewer men die, they lose less territory.

Fighting the war till the end is their worst option.
This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 7:19 am
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 7:21 am to
Should call it a 'Victory Wishlist'
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
13223 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Invitation of Ukraine to NATO: Zelenskyy emphasized that Ukraine's invitation to NATO would serve as a "proof of determination" and signal how NATO partners envision Ukraine’s role in the future "security architecture."

Wasn't that, pretty much word for word, what Putin said he didn't want to happen a decade or 2 ago? Putin's line in the sand.

Yeah...sure...sounds like an excellent victory plan.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42607 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 8:31 am to
In hindsight letting Ukraine in NATO when twenty years ago may have been better than what we have now; however, there is no way to know for sure.
Posted by Tiger985
Member since Nov 2006
7678 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Should call it a 'Victory Wishlist'


Someone should tell Zelensky what "plan" means.

Unless NATO (the United States) decides to fight Russia themselves, the Ukrainians are fricked. And no NATO population wants to fight WWIII with Russia over 20% of Ukraine. Or even 100% of Ukraine.

This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 10:24 am
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
26257 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 10:57 am to
What was it your boy Obama said? "Elections have consequences".

Ukraine is seeing the consequences of weak leaders like Biden/Harris, Scholz, Macron and the type we see in the EU being elected. BTW: Still waiting on Macron to send the Frogs to fight. LOL. What lying frauds these people are.

Knuckleheads and pathetically weak losers.
This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 11:01 am
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20967 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:35 am to
quote:


If their economy was imploding like some on here suggest, they would be more open to it.


I think that there's a very strong argument that Russia's current offensive is only designed to last through the US presidential election.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20967 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 11:40 am to
quote:

The peace deal they make today is better than the one they’ll make in a month, six months, or a year.

Fewer men die, they lose less territory.

Fighting the war till the end is their worst option.


Maybe. Everything depends on the level of western support for Ukraine.

Ukraine's problem right now is that the Europeans have given most of what they can spare. Most of them had very low levels of equipment before the war.

That leaves the US, and Biden is unwilling to give Ukraine enough equipment to defend itself. We could easily spare another 500 Bradleys and 500 Strikers, but Biden isn't giving Ukraine enough to equip the new brigades that they need to make.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20967 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 12:10 pm to
Crazy video of a Russian APC that drove right up next to a Ukrainian tank.and got blown up.

I don't know if the APC driver thought that the tank was disabled (it is smoking at the beginning of the video), or if he somehow didn't see it, or if he thought that it was a Russian tank. The three Russians who survive the original blast were riding on the top of the APC.

I can't remember seeing such a close-up armor engagement since the fight for Mariupol at the beginning of the war.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


I also wonder what was going through the Ukrainian tanker's mind as he saw the APC approaching. I wonder if he delayed shooting because he was afraid that it was a Ukrainian APC.
This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 12:13 pm
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

We could easily spare another 500 Bradleys and 500 Strikers,


Just a couple billion more dollars to stop the Russian spread
This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 12:40 pm
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20967 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 12:42 pm to
No, it's not any money at all -- just old equipment whose only real purpose was to fight Russia.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8364 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

No, it's not any money at all


We paid for those with taxpayer dollars to use for ourselves. They cost money at some point.

Ukraine can feel free to buy them off of us though. Cash only, no loans.
This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 12:44 pm
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20967 posts
Posted on 10/16/24 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Dozens of soon-to-be-retired Australian Abrams tanks will be sent to Ukraine under a $245 million military support package to bolster the war-torn country's fight against Russia's invasion.

More than a year after Kyiv first expressed interest in the aging M1A1 fleet, and months after Australia rejected a request to donate its grounded Taipan helicopters, the Albanese government has confirmed it will now gift 49 of the American-made tanks.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, who is attending a NATO defence ministers meeting in Brussels this week, will brief his Ukrainian counterpart directly about the latest support package.



LINK
first pageprev pagePage 4215 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram