Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 5/24/24 at 10:01 am to
Posted by RuLSU
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2007
8129 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Exclusive: Putin wants Ukraine ceasefire on current frontlines


Only newsworthy if Putin is willing to concede on Ukrainian military / Ukrainian sovereignty.

As soon as Russia accepts that Ukraine can maintain its military, join EU, etc, there's no reason not to accept a formal peace.

... and then you roll a bunch of NATO armies into Ukraine and keep them there for the next 10 years so Putin doesn't get any silly ideas.
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
2954 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 10:13 am to
same game since his KGB days...

This post was edited on 5/24/24 at 10:15 am
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
18919 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 10:17 am to
I think that today's story from Reuters marks a turning point in the war. It's an acknowledgment from Putin that the strategic tide is turning against him, regardless of whether Russian troops manage to capture another couple of Ukrainian farms in the next few weeks.

These, I think, are the factors that Putin is considering:


1) The financial inability for Russia to continue this war for more than another 9-12 months,

2) The fact that another big mobilization would cause serious harm to the Russian economy and hasten the financial collapse,

3) The looming military crisis when Russia no longer has armored vehicles that it can pull out of storage and efficiently refurbish, which I think happens in 6-9 months,

4) The fact that ATACMS, etc. are systematically removing air defense and Russian ships from Crimea. Long-term, Russia will struggle to maintain military control of Crimea,

5) The fact that the Kharkiv incursion is leading the West to reconsider its policies for weapons use inside Russia,

6) The impending arrival of F-16s in Ukraine,

7) The growing Ukrainian defense industry, with Ukrainian drones now increasingly a strategic threat,

8) The upcoming "peace summit" in Switzerland next month, where much of the world will commit to support Ukraine in the restoration of its borders,

9) The G7 meeting next month, where G7 leaders will advance Ukraine $50 billion as an advance on the profits from the investment of seized Russian assets,

10) The arrival of ammo from the US (and, to a lesser extent, from the Czech initiative), restoring the ability of Ukraine to lessen the fires disparity along the front,

11) The successful implementation of the new Ukrainian mobilization law, ensuring that Ukraine will have the troops needed to fight for a long time to come,

12) The deepening Russian dependence on China, with Xi exerting a growing influence over the Russian economy.


In my opinion, Putin has looked at the strategic situation and finally concluded that the war is not going to continue to go his way. This is the first time that Putin has started looking for an exit ramp.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
37469 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 10:27 am to
quote:

In my opinion, Putin has looked at the strategic situation and finally concluded that the war is not going to continue to go his way. This is the first time that Putin has started looking for an exit ramp.


Putin may have looked at the strategic situation as you described it, but it’s exactly opposite of the one LW paints.

But I believe you are right to a certain extent. What Putin really wants is a timeout. He got one after taking Crimea and parts of the Donbas after the 2014 invasion. He needs another to retool, get his economy back on track and to get the West off his arse.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23514 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 11:15 am to
quote:

When people post easily discredited Russian propaganda, I shouldn't call them stupid?


You don't have the capacity to evaluate anything, so no I wouldn't advise it.
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
2582 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 11:39 am to
Damn you’ve started melting hard, shite must have started looking worse for Russia.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
3319 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 11:47 am to
quote:

But I believe you are right to a certain extent. What Putin really wants is a timeout. He got one after taking Crimea and parts of the Donbas after the 2014 invasion. He needs another to retool, get his economy back on track and to get the West off his arse.


To me it feels like if Russia really has aims on capturing any more than they currently have (which I think they would do if it were easily done, but that ultimately isn't their tactical objective) they probably need to do it now.

I don't see Ukraine agreeing to neuter itself militarily. Ukraine probably gets in the EU or at least gets some special status with it, and this allows Ukraine to build their base defenses back up and the west as a whole to expand its manufacturing capabilities and further aid Ukraine against any future threat.

Putin is probably gone by the time they would be capable enough to try again.

I guess thats a long winded way of saying they have what they want and will be able to get most of what they want via any deal, and any fighting now is too high of a cost for too little gain (this is really true for both sides).
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
10606 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 11:50 am to
quote:

You are off the rails. If no one else in your life is telling you this, I'm sorry you don't have proper support.


Just actual Russian citizens, but you got Tucker the Stupid Phucker telling you they are NAZI, and booger sugar loving OML
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
2582 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

I don't see Ukraine agreeing to neuter itself militarily. Ukraine probably gets in the EU or at least gets some special status with it, and this allows Ukraine to build their base defenses back up and the west as a whole to expand its manufacturing capabilities and further aid Ukraine against any future threat.

Putin is probably gone by the time they would be capable enough to try again.


This is exactly what that guy a couple weeks ago was saying that you accused of being short sighted.


This post was edited on 5/24/24 at 12:02 pm
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
37469 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

This is exactly what that guy a couple weeks ago was saying that you accused of being short sighted.


Thank you
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
3319 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

This is exactly what that guy a couple weeks ago was saying that you accused of being short sighted.



Link?

I said a couple of weeks ago that there would be a peace deal, and called someone short sighted for saying Russia wouldn't also build itself back up and likely end up being a better military than they are now in the future because they wouldn't be pulling 60yo equipment out of storage to retrofit.
This post was edited on 5/24/24 at 12:14 pm
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
4556 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

" It is likely that Gerasimov will not hold his position for long. And the scheme of his removal will be identical to that of Shoigu. First, criminal cases against his deputies (which is already happening) and his inner circle and then "honorable retirement". What will happen next, by the way, with Shoigu and Gerasimov is still a question. The "Prigozhin case" is quite likely. Quite in the spirit of Putin."


Any insight into who Putin is trying to replace them with? Competent, or apparatchiks?

What does he think he gains?
This post was edited on 5/24/24 at 12:14 pm
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
3319 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:13 pm to
The actual quotes in question which were re: post-war Russia, not Ukraine

quote:

How are they strengthening their military? Russia has lost over 3000 tanks in this war. Those were T90s, T80s, and modernized T72s which were its most advanced tanks. Those tanks are being replaced by unmodernized T72s, T62s, and T55s pulled from storage. Same thing applies to its helicopters, planes, APCs, and the quality of the training of its troops. Russia’s military economy might be expanding but they are replacing licensed western technology like the fire control system on their tanks with cold war era technology.


You're looking at this short term. Their military likely won't be strengthened during this war, but in the years after its entirely possible if not the most likely outcome that the equipment they are pulling out of storage will be replaced with newly manufactured equipment. Its unlikely that a nation as large and with as many people and natural resources as Russia just withers away into a shell of itself and not rebuild its military, regardless of the result of the Ukraine War.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
37469 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

I said a couple of weeks ago that there would be a peace deal, and called someone short sided for saying Russia wouldn't also build itself back up and likely end up being a better military than they are now in the future because they wouldn't be pulling 60yo equipment out of storage to retrofit.


So if GOPTiger is correct and Russia is on the edge, its economy is in the crapper, and its running out of equipment; Russia’s military is going to be better?

You are overlooking a huge problem. Russian corruption. They are corrupted and inefficient. Have they ever demonstrated a strong military without massive aid from the West?
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
3319 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

So if GOPTiger is correct




But lets play along.

quote:

Russia’s military is going to be better?


"in the future" doesn't mean "right away".

They are using a bunch of old stuff and it will eventually be replaced with new. Its literally the same logic pro-aid people use when saying "we are giving Ukraine our old stuff".

Unless there is a transformative financial and military collapse, they will still be a massive military with newer stuff at some point in the future. I said at least 10-20 years, it might be 40-50. There are a ton of factors at play including the specifics of how this current conflict off-ramps.

quote:

Have they ever demonstrated a strong military without massive aid from the West?


If "beat the US in a conflict" is your measuring stick, no. But no one would live up to that metric.

Which countries would soundly beat Russia in a conflict 1v1 with no interference even right now? France and the UK maybe, maybe China. They are undoubtedly a strong military by most metrics. The US also spends like 8-10 times more on military spending than Russia does. Not saying they are some juggernaut, but they are objectively a strong military that no one wants to just jump into a war against.

quote:

You are overlooking a huge problem. Russian corruption. They are corrupted and inefficient


Its undoubtedly an issue, but I think you're overrating the problem somewhat because of how corrupt and inefficient the USSR was. And part of my take was also involving Putin's eventual successor, and theres really no telling how corrupt Russia will be under whoever it is and how much of a hindrance to military buildup they will be.
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
1410 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

quote:
Exclusive: Putin wants Ukraine ceasefire on current frontlines

Only newsworthy if Putin is willing to concede on Ukrainian military / Ukrainian sovereignty.

As soon as Russia accepts that Ukraine can maintain its military, join EU, etc, there's no reason not to accept a formal peace.

... and then you roll a bunch of NATO armies into Ukraine and keep them there for the next 10 years so Putin doesn't get any silly ideas.


It still sends the message to the international community that you can seize part of a sovereign nation and get away with it...

So like, if a neighboring state has an oil rich region and you have bigger military, just invade that one region saying you're nervous about your defense and that makes you not so nervous.

I also don't trust Putin one bit, of course... he knows now that the West is united against him and have found ways to "Trump-proof" aid to Ukraine he can't win... he actually will lose everything... so to save his own neck he'll call things off... for now. He still is in a shite spot with a demographic collapse that will cause his country to fall apart in the coming decade... he'll regroup, rebuild, and try something else...

I also think Xi probably told him he was running out of patience for this shite and it was causing too much trouble.

Also, this means Iran benefits from Russia not being too distracted to help them cause trouble in the Middle-East
This post was edited on 5/24/24 at 1:22 pm
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
2954 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 1:21 pm to
Kuleba: Putin wants to derail Ukraine's peace summit by claiming 'readiness for ceasefire'

by Kateryna Denisova and The Kyiv Independent news desk May 24, 2024 9:03 PM

Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to disrupt Ukraine's upcoming peace summit in Switzerland, Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said on May 24 in response to reports about Putin's alleged willing to halt the war at the current front lines.

A Reuters report from earlier in the day, which cited undisclosed Russian sources, claimed that Putin is open to a ceasefire that recognizes the current front lines on the battlefield but will fight on if Kyiv and its allies do not agree.

Kuleba rejected these reports, saying the Russian president has no desire to end Moscow's full-scale war.

"Putin is desperately trying to derail the Peace Summit in Switzerland on June 15–16. He is scared of its success," he wrote on X.

"His entourage sends these phony signals of alleged readiness for a ceasefire despite the fact that Russian troops continue to brutally attack Ukraine while their missiles and drones rain down on Ukrainian cities and communities."

Ukraine's summit will be centered around Ukraine's 10-point peace formula, a plan first outlined by President Volodymyr Zelensky in fall 2022 that calls for a complete withdrawal of Russian troops from occupied Ukrainian lands.

Fifty countries have reportedly confirmed their participation in the global peace summit, including India.

Zelensky previously ruled out Russia's participation in the event, as it continues to attack Ukraine on a daily basis.

Participants of the summit will formulate a common negotiating position on the outcome of the war and submit it to Russia, according to presidential spokesperson Sergii Nykyforov.

"Only the principled and united voice of the global majority can force him to choose peace over war. This is what the peace summit is intended to achieve. This is why he (Putin) is so afraid of it," Kuleba said.

The Kyiv Independent
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
37469 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 1:29 pm to
[quote]Its undoubtedly an issue, but I think you're overrating the problem somewhat because of how corrupt and inefficient the USSR was. And part of my take was also involving Putin's eventual successor, and theres really no telling how corrupt Russia will be under whoever it is and how much of a hindrance to military buildup they will be.[/quote

You don’t think it hadn’t been a major issue in this war?
Posted by Lee B
Member since Dec 2018
1410 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 1:30 pm to
... and there you have it.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
3319 posts
Posted on 5/24/24 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

You don’t think it hadn’t been a major issue in this war?


quote:

ts undoubtedly an issue



???????
first pageprev pagePage 3822 of 4170Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram