- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 12/21/23 at 2:50 pm to LSUPilot07
Posted on 12/21/23 at 2:50 pm to LSUPilot07
There are two teams and you are on the wrong one. One day maybe you'll stumble into being red pilled. Enjoy supporting the enemy until that day.
This post was edited on 12/21/23 at 2:51 pm
1
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:03 pm to SirWinston
quote:
LOL you support the same people that installed Biden and are working overtime to do it again. You are such a simp, and so is anyone who supports Ukraine. The lowest of the low. Beneath soyboys even, because they have the excuse of liberal naiveté.
Ronald Reagan is spinning in his grave at the traitors supporting the Russian invasion.
Christ on a Cracker. Liberals aren't the problem-- like a broken clock, they happen to get one right once every now and again. You can tell because the whackalooon left, and the whackaloon populist (I will not call people like that conservative) are aligned in opposition.
American Conservatism has always understood the logic of curtailing our greatest foreign threats, and threats to our interest. A shame that so many who falsely try to wear the mantle of Conservative fail to understand it.
`
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:08 pm to BoardReader
quote:
Reported as the third Russian TOS 1A "Solntsepek" destroyed in under a week time near Krynky on the left bank.
I am really posting this not for the information or the boom on the screen but the voice over in the first 10 seconds: Bada-boom jugga jugga muzzafricker.
Twitter video
Posted on 12/21/23 at 3:09 pm to SirWinston
So i’m the enemy because I’m a Trump Republican that supports Ukraine? Fine I’m the enemy then. Unfortunately you’re still a douchebag and there is no cure for that.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 4:06 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Sovereign nations have the right to decide what’s best for themselves ... UNLESS what they judge as best for them negatively impacts what is good for another.
Is this your position or the Russians?
And regardless, if the description of the Russian position is accurate, then NATO expansion was absolutely the right thing to do.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 4:53 pm to LSUPilot07
quote:
Unfortunately you’re still a douchebag and there is no cure for that.
No, he doesn't even post what he believes, as we established just a few pages ago. He posts to be "entertaining."
In other words, he's just trolling for fun. He doesn't believe any of the crap he posts.
It's all an act. He probably is a leftist antifa supporter doing this for kicks.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 4:56 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:Are you illiterate? Are you high? WTF is your excuse for that imbecilic question?
Is this your position or the Russians?
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:13 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:WAIT! What position are you referring to?
Is this your position or the Russians?
... if the description of the Russian position is accurate
quote:No, it wasn't the right thing to do.
if the description of the Russian position is accurate, then NATO expansion was absolutely the right thing to do.
NATO expansion actually did (and does) threaten Russian sovereignty via an eastward encroaching enemy military alliance.
NATO expansion against a democratized Russia in the late-1990's, especially in association with concomitant kowtowing to Communist China, was absurdly stupid policy.
Putin was the result.
DO YOU GET THAT, DUMBASS?
This post was edited on 12/22/23 at 5:07 am
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:15 pm to NC_Tigah
White House pushing for plan to seize Russia’s frozen $300 billion — report
December 21, 2023, 01:15 PM
Washington is in talks with its allies to develop a plan to seize $300 billion in frozen assets of the Russian Central Bank and use the funds to aid Ukraine, The New York Times reported on Dec. 21.
According to U.S. officials, talks among finance ministers, central bankers, diplomats, and lawyers have intensified over recent weeks amid concerns that Western financial support for Ukraine is waning.
The administration is pressing the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, and Japan to develop a confiscation strategy by the second anniversary of the invasion on Feb. 24, 2024, the report says.
The New Voice of Ukraine
December 21, 2023, 01:15 PM
Washington is in talks with its allies to develop a plan to seize $300 billion in frozen assets of the Russian Central Bank and use the funds to aid Ukraine, The New York Times reported on Dec. 21.
According to U.S. officials, talks among finance ministers, central bankers, diplomats, and lawyers have intensified over recent weeks amid concerns that Western financial support for Ukraine is waning.
The administration is pressing the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Canada, and Japan to develop a confiscation strategy by the second anniversary of the invasion on Feb. 24, 2024, the report says.
The New Voice of Ukraine
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:17 pm to BoardReader
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:18 pm to NC_Tigah
It was rhetorical, to drive home the next point, which you conveniently didn’t address. Notice the ‘regardless’ in the next sentence which was meant to be the completion of the hypophoria.
Again, if that description of the Russian position is accurate, then we have to affirm that the maximalist, defensive realist route that NATO ended up taking.
Again, if that description of the Russian position is accurate, then we have to affirm that the maximalist, defensive realist route that NATO ended up taking.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:22 pm to SirWinston
quote:
SirWinston
quote:
such a simp
First truthful thing you've said in this entire thread
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:22 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:bullshite!
It was rhetorical
It was completely ignorant with regard to the exchanges addressed. So again, are you illiterate, high, or just didn't bother to read WTF you were responding to, dumbass?
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:24 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
He probably is a leftist antifa supporter doing this for kicks.
Quite the opposite. America First.
Think Tucker Carlson with pinches of RFK and NF.
This post was edited on 12/21/23 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:26 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
WAIT! What position are you referring to?
You do have trouble comprehending really basic sentences.
quote:
No, it wasn't the right thing to do.
Then you are completely naive.
quote:
NATO expansion actually did (and does) threaten Russian sovereignty via an eastward encroaching enemy military alliance.
I am going to ask you a question and this is a question which has a correct answer. Who drove NATO expansion?
quote:
NATO expansion against a democratized Russia, especially in association with concomitant kowtowing to Communist China, was absurdly stupid policy.
You aren’t thinking this through. There was no guarantee that Russia would actually be a successful democracy in the post-Soviet era. You are giving NATO also supernatural abilities. If you read the diplomatic cables during that era, you’d likely see many things that you seem hellbent on not seeing, namely that there wasn’t any certainty that Russia would take a democratic path and that Russia itself had many choices that led to this situation. Why you focus singularly on one conclusion as though it was assured is a weird rhetorical position.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:28 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
It was completely ignorant with regard to the exchanges addressed. So again, are you illiterate, high, or just didn't bother to read WTF you were responding to, dumbass?
Nah, you’ve made it clear that you are definitely the dumbass. You repeat things without reference, your description of the historical record is not accurate, and this lack of accuracy completely undermines your positions. You don’t know what you are talking about and are insisting that you do. Log off, for your own sake.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:36 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:No.
You repeat things without reference
Sorry.
Don't deflect.
I'm beyond happy to discuss my assertions.
But FIRST, you claimed a dumbass response to a very specifically worded series of posts was ""rhetorical."" It wasn't. It was a dumbass, anti-intellectual response, after which you tried to play catch-up.
I'm sure you're used to getting away with that type BS in this thread. But you've been called on it here.
Let's address it.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:46 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I'm beyond happy to discuss my assertions.
Doesn't seem like it.
quote:
But FIRST, you claimed a dumbass response to a very specifically worded series of posts was ""rhetorical."" It wasn't. It was a dumbass, anti-intellectual response, after which you tried to play catch-up.
Lol. Why did you use double-quotes? How are you this terrible at English?
I also named the rhetorical device I used. As in, it doesn't matter if your personal, particular position reflects the Russian position directly or not, what matters is that if that is an accurate description of the Russian position with respect to their sovereignty over their neighbors sovereignty, then NATO was absolutely correct to seek enlargement.
quote:
I'm sure you're used to getting away with that type BS in this thread. But you've been called on it here.
Please. You gave one of the worst descriptions I've ever read of Zelensky and Putin's interactions with no reference to anything. You understand that there were results from that first meeting, and that there were a few key events you glossed over without a thought and being completely incorrect hasn't stopped you from furiously typing. You do that repeatedly, where your lack of reference for anything that occurred in history doesn't seem to exist for you. You retreat to solipsistic positions and don't realize it.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 5:54 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:Do these deflections work here normally?
Lol. Why did you use double-quotes?
you claimed a dumbass response to a very specifically worded series of posts was ""rhetorical."" It wasn't. It was a dumbass, anti-intellectual response, after which you tried to play catch-up.
Again, I'm sure you're used to getting away with that type BS in this thread. But you've been called on it here.
Let's address it.
Posted on 12/21/23 at 6:21 pm to SirWinston
Nah you’re just a little bitch that enjoys trolling which is really sad to be honest. I bet you are either a little immature college kid or you’re a sad middle age shite who has no career or anyone that loves him so you spread your bullshite wherever you can. You’re also either gay or haven’t been laid in years, if ever.
Page 3407 of 3914
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News