- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 5/23/22 at 5:52 pm to soccerfüt
Posted on 5/23/22 at 5:52 pm to soccerfüt
quote:
One Eight Hundred, Five, Eight, Eight, Two, Three Hundred. EM-Pire!
Completely unrelated - Empire Carpets was a Chicago were carpet company when I grew up in the area. One of my classmates in like, 7th grade, got to be in a commercial for them. (His line: “WOW! A Michael Jordan basketball, from WILSON”) as they were running a basketball promo at that time (1991 or so).
So after that commercial airs he has all the 7th grade girls following him around like he’s a movie star for a month or two, which we were all jealous of.
30 years later I feel bad for the guy for peaking before copious amounts of sex was realistically an option following a quick 15 minute burst of celebrity.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 5:54 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Who said I didn’t support it?
quote:
There is nothing sovereign about Ukraine.
OK.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 5:56 pm to JayDeerTay84
Think about it like this, NATO exist because without the Union, Russia could just annex one by one. These countries, own their own, stand little to no chance.
As such, it was always a failure for Ukraine to exist without sufficient capabilities to be self sufficient. They aren’t. So then, the idea of sovereignty also includes ones ability to secure “security”.
Regardless of my view that Russia is in the wrong does not excuse the fact that Ukraine playing half in half out is why we are here and we certainly share in the blame.
As such, it was always a failure for Ukraine to exist without sufficient capabilities to be self sufficient. They aren’t. So then, the idea of sovereignty also includes ones ability to secure “security”.
Regardless of my view that Russia is in the wrong does not excuse the fact that Ukraine playing half in half out is why we are here and we certainly share in the blame.
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:00 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
If I am wrong, you can speak with facts. Being snarky solves nothing and offers no counter to anything I said.
The fact is Ukrainians have been a separate people from Russians form the very beginning. When Ukraine finally had their independence after the fall of the Soviet Union, they specifically focused on becoming aligned with Europe as they see themselves as European and not Russian.
This is the historical perspective backed up by actual Ukrainians I talked to while in Ukraine.
Is that snarkless enough for you? When you post shite like this:
quote:
When the Soviet Union failed, Ukraine became a state propped up by the West
I tend to respond with snark because it shows a deep ignorance of the Ukrainian people and their history.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:03 pm to Centinel
So the West didn’t prop up Ukraine when the USSR failed? Because they most certainly did.
And I dont mean this as a bad thing. Just pointing out the writing was on the wall. Ukraine should have been in NATO from day 1.
If they where, do you think there would be a war today?
And I dont mean this as a bad thing. Just pointing out the writing was on the wall. Ukraine should have been in NATO from day 1.
If they where, do you think there would be a war today?
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:05 pm to Chromdome35
An article that discusses how Russia is asking the mothers of sailors who perished on the Moskova to agree that their sons were killed in an accident.
I really dislike the way Russia is manipulating the truth about their fallen soldiers. I think long term that is going to cause some issues internally.
https://theins.ru/en/news/251526
I really dislike the way Russia is manipulating the truth about their fallen soldiers. I think long term that is going to cause some issues internally.
https://theins.ru/en/news/251526
quote:
The mother of conscript Muhammed Murtazaev, who had served on the Moskva cruiser, was asked to sign documents stating her son died as a result of an accident, Novaya Gazeta Europe reports.
We were told that my son was on the list of the missing servicemen. At the same time this information was not provided in writing. We also sent a request to the Military Commissariat of the Republic of Crimea and received an answer on April 29: «I notify you with regret that your son Murtazaev Muhammed Serverovich, who had been conscripted into military service, went missing as a result of an accident on the ,GMC guards missile cruiser, Moskva in the high seas on April 13, 2022, the woman said. She added that «at a meeting with the command, the relatives were told that the cruiser was in neutral waters and did not participate in hostilities
The mother of another killed conscript told the journalists that as she was trying to understand whether her son was considered dead or missing, she also received notices from the military registration and enlistment office which said: «We regret to inform you that your son is missing as a result of an accident.» The woman was asked to sign under the notices.
They invite me to sign this statement and say there are witnesses who saw my son on the cruiser that day, but no one saw him disappear. I don't have it in my hands, I didn't even come to get it, I said I wouldn't sign anything. Still they call me and say that three families have already signed such a statement, come over and write a statement too, so that you can go straight to court, without dragging it out for too long. They didn't even ask me if I was ready to sign such a statement saying I voluntarily agree that my son was killed... Not even killed. It says dead as a result of an accident and does not specify he participated in the operation, she said.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:10 pm to Chromdome35
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/29/23 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:15 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
So the West didn’t prop up Ukraine when the USSR failed? Because they most certainly did.
They most certainly did not. Feel free to detail exactly how they were "propped up".
quote:
Ukraine should have been in NATO from day 1.
No, they should not have. Because they were promised, by written agreement from Russia, that they would, like all other former satellite states, be allowed to pursue their own agendas. At that time they were more focused on integration with Europe and not joining NATO. Ukraine was taking the pragmatic approach to move towards the European influence they wanted without antagonizing Russia in a spirit of good faith to those agreements.
Putin broke that agreement when he invaded in 2014. All else that has followed flows from that.
quote:
If they where, do you think there would be a war today?
Moot point, as in the beginning NATO, and Europe, respected Russia's agreement of self determination....so it wasn't for them to bring Ukraine in to NATO unless they requested it. And Ukraine did not, again, out of spirit of honoring the agreement with Russia.
Again, that all changed in 2014.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:18 pm to Centinel
We can morally say Russia broke the rules all we want but the fact is, Ukraine was not properly secured.
The only deterrent is strength.
You know who’s fault it is for “trusting” Russia? Ukraine and the West. Period.
The only deterrent is strength.
You know who’s fault it is for “trusting” Russia? Ukraine and the West. Period.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:22 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
You know who’s fault it is for “trusting” Russia? Ukraine and the West. Period.
No disagreement here. And it's why we're seeing the response from the west we are. Russia needs to be punished for shitting on all their agreements, one Javelin at a time.
I've always thought Ukraine giving up their nukes was stupid, considering how Russia has treated Ukraine over the last hundred years or so.
That doesn't change the fact the west did not prop up Ukraine. The west let Ukraine chart their own path, and Putin took advantage of the west's good faith. And he's paying for it now.
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:47 pm to Centinel
quote:
That doesn't change the fact the west did not prop up Ukraine. The west let Ukraine chart their own path, and Putin took advantage of the west's good faith. And he's paying for it now.
Then I guess we can agree to disagree with the UK and US signing the Budapest Memorandum and that it was no big deal.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:49 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Then I guess we can agree to disagree with the UK and US signing the Budapest Memorandum and that it was no big deal.
We signed it, like Russia did. We followed it until Russia broke it. I fail to see your point?
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:53 pm to Centinel
quote:
We signed it, like Russia did. We followed it until Russia broke it. I fail to see your point?
As I said previously, how can you consider one a sovereign state without securing security?
When Ukraine agreed to de-nuke and work with the West it was always a matter of time to either A: fully secure security or B: face Russian aggression.
I dont know in what world anyone would be shocked that scummy commies turn out to be scummy commies.
As I said, Ukraine played half in half out and we are all surprised?
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:55 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
As I said, Ukraine played half in half out and we are all surprised?
But they didn't. They played "Russia will honor their agreements, so we will honor ours". The only one that played half out is Russia.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:58 pm to Centinel
quote:
But they didn't. They played "Russia will honor their agreements, so we will honor ours". The only one that played half out is Russia.
Like I said, we can just agree to disagree. The writing was all over the wall for what we have today.
Saying, "we trusted Russia" isn't a defense.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:01 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
As I said previously, how can you consider one a sovereign state without securing security?
Wait, wait,wait… What does "securing security" have to do with sovereignty? Costa Rica has no standing army so that means any old party can invade CR and they'd have a right to?
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:01 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Saying, "we trusted Russia" isn't a defense.
It is if you're going to be consistent in your global politics and not be backstabbing bitch like Russia.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:02 pm to Centinel
quote:
It is if you're going to be consistent in your global politics and not be backstabbing bitch like Russia.
Its not backstabbing to ensure Ukraine was actually capable of securing itself. You can have strength as a deterrent without every invading or firing a shot.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:04 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Its not backstabbing to ensure Ukraine was actually capable of securing itself. You can have strength as a deterrent without every invading or firing a shot.
We did for almost twenty years.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:07 pm to LeClerc
quote:
Wait, wait,wait… What does "securing security" have to do with sovereignty? Costa Rica has no standing army so that means any old party can invade CR and they'd have a right to?
If you are not protected by another country or faction of countries, you are subject to your own defense and the whim of the political atmosphere around you.
So, if you are invaded and taken over, you are nothing. Morals dont really mean much when reality hits.
To your point, Costa Rica's independence is secured via a treaty with the US in 1948.
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 7:08 pm
Popular
Back to top


0





