Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:27 pm to
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5997 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

If you cant defend or secure the means to defend country, how are you sovereign? It goes against the very meaning of the word. History is full of nations that came and went.


Well were they nations or weren’t they?
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36174 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:30 pm to
quote:


As I said previously, how can you consider one a sovereign state without securing security?




Would you consider Switzerland a Sovereign State? Costa Rica?

Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36174 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

If you are not protected by another country or faction of countries, you are subject to your own defense and the whim of the political atmosphere around you.

So, if you are invaded and taken over, you are nothing. Morals dont really mean much when reality hits.

To your point, Costa Rica's independence is secured via a treaty with the US in 1948.




Honest question for you:

Do you believe the Confederacy was a Sovereign State?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46561 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

Do you believe the Confederacy was a Sovereign State?


Trick question. Under the legal precedence prior to the war? Yes. Under the legal precedence after the war? No.

I'll let you interpret the fallout as you feel fit.

ETA: Also an interesting study in to how stare decisis is a thing until it's not politically expedient.
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 8:39 pm
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5997 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

If Germany never lost WW2, would Poland exist today? No.


Did Poland become sovereign at the end of WW2 in your mind?
Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9956 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Did Poland become sovereign at the end of WW2 in your mind?


No. I dont consider Poland anything until they were in NATO and secured.

I view a lot of these little insignificant countries like states in the US.

You know, Texas is a great state, but we would get absolutely bodied if the rest of the states in the US ganged up on us and attacked us. The strength is our union.

Sovereignty, in my view, is strength. That is why North Korea exist as economically and socially insignificant as they are.
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 8:49 pm
Posted by VOLhalla
Knoxville
Member since Feb 2011
5176 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

No I am not. I am giving a reason as to why these things happen. Its not "justifying" to give actual reasons as to why shite happens.


Noting that stronger nations have invaded and conquered weaker nations isn’t exactly a brilliant insight. Nobody needs you to explain that

But the idea that Ukraine is not a sovereign nation because Russia could, possibly, invade and conquer is just stupid. Every country could be destroyed. It’s always possible.

quote:

As I said previously, how can you consider one a sovereign state without securing security?


No country is absolutely secure. I guess you’re saying sovereignty doesn’t exist

Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46561 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:55 pm to
quote:


No. I dont consider Poland anything until they were in NATO and secured.


That's because you've never been to Poland. And don't understand Polish history.
Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9956 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

But the idea that Ukraine is not a sovereign nation because Russia could, possibly, invade and conquer is just stupid. Every country could be destroyed. It’s always possible.


I didn't say that. I said they are not sovereign because they failed to secure their country. Not because Russia could "possibly" attack.

It should have always been a matter of "when".

quote:

No country is absolutely secure. I guess you’re saying sovereignty doesn’t exist


I am saying is a meaningless word as it is. The only thing that means anything internationally is strength.

We should all be in agreeance that there are parts of this world that will never be like us and think like us. History has showed that when opposite political ideologies exist and a power gap is is present, it gets acted on in one way or another.

Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9956 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

That's because you've never been to Poland. And don't understand Polish history.


Cool. Poland exist today because the US entered the war.
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 9:00 pm
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
75436 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:19 pm to
U r dum.

And unwise.

That’s a bad combo platter.

But keep being you, the hipster who’s always swimming upstream.

Just be that moran somewhere else, please.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46561 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Cool. Poland exist today because the US entered the war.


no.

Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5997 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

I dont consider Poland anything until they were in NATO and secured


Well if that is your position what is the point of asking “would Poland be sovereign if Germany had one WW2?” and than answering your own question “no” other than to troll.

What you are doing is setting up a test of sovereignty where it is unknowable until it is ended. You would make one hell of a jurist in the Massachusetts Bay Colony.

But then again this is 21st century America and if you want to redefine words such as sovereign to mean whatever you want it’s a free and potentially sovereign nation.
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
22344 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:23 pm to
Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9956 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:43 pm to
You know, maybe the problem is I am using the literal meaning of the word “sovereign”.

possessing supreme or ultimate power



Now you guys tell me, what is supreme about being invaded by your neighbor?

Posted by pussywillows
Member since Dec 2009
6658 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:48 pm to
or you could use the definition that actually applies

quote:

(of a nation or its affairs) acting or done independently and without outside interference.
Posted by LeClerc
USVI
Member since Oct 2012
2841 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:48 pm to
Get outta here with that crap!
Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9956 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:49 pm to
Obviously they are allowing Russia to interfere.

Also, they rely on western funds.

I am using it correctly. Thanks.
Posted by pussywillows
Member since Dec 2009
6658 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:50 pm to
oooh, you're just stupid...carry on!
Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9956 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:52 pm to
You sure showed me!
first pageprev pagePage 1046 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram