Started By
Message

re: LA Times: Is California government considering oil refinery takeovers? Yes, it is

Posted on 2/17/25 at 9:15 pm to
Posted by bcoop199
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2013
9181 posts
Posted on 2/17/25 at 9:15 pm to
Cali is so sure that because of climate change that we need to convert over to electric cars why would there be a need to produce so much gasoline?
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31554 posts
Posted on 2/17/25 at 9:21 pm to
It’s like they don’t understand basic business in that state.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24896 posts
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:03 pm to
That’s what a place that turns communist always does
Posted by Hondo Blacksheep
Member since Jul 2022
3141 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:42 am to
How about they stop distorting the market and let consumers choose the platforms they want to use. Crazy I know ....
Posted by RanchoLaPuerto
Jena
Member since Aug 2023
2159 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 3:58 am to
They’ll hire Birdseed to run it.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
20425 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 4:08 am to
California has become the dumbest state in the union, and that’s saying something.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15766 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 5:48 am to
It's Renewable Diesel not Biodiesel. Very little Biodiesel which made with vegetable oil and methanol is passe.

To make Renewable Diesel one needs to have an existing high pressure hydrotreater and hydrocracker in the existing refinery. Plus a source of animal fat, vegetable oil and/or spent deep fryer oil. Ask the attempted conversion of the former Shell refinery in Saraland (Mobile) AL which was converted then couldn't secure enough feedstock in the international market.

This is old news anyway.

California's rising costs for refining are due rapidly depleting oil reserves in the state. It enjoyed some of the least expensive gasoline for 100 years due instate production of heavy crude oil of around 18 API gravity and 3.5% sulfur. All of its refineries had cokers or made asphalt. Importing heavy crude from overseas or from Canada is the only fix.
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 5:53 am
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15766 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 6:02 am to
quote:

That’s not why refineries are pulling out

They are pulling out because of the insane regulations environment in the Peoples Republic of CA


Correct. Shell was the first to shutdown its refinery at Wilmington, CA with separate at Carson the Cat Cracking, Reforming, Distillate Hydrotreating and a chemical plant to make synthetic ethanol from cat cracker produced ethane for Scope in 1990, due outrageous requirements of excessive capital investment required by the state. Another smaller refinery was shutdown around the same time with attempt to restart in the mid 1990's and finally dismantled, relocated to Houston for refurbishment before being sent to Romania but that project was cancelled and it still sits in a laydown yard in Houston since then, It necessary would have lost 10% throughput capacity to change from heavy crude to intermediate crude.
Posted by TygerLyfe
Member since May 2023
3992 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 7:03 am to
Another step towards becoming North Korea with sunsets
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
7129 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 7:06 am to
Rest of the refineries in the US need to cease selling gas and petroleum products to them if they are going to subsidize what is a private industry. It's unfair competition that arbitrarily lowers the value of the good(s) being sold.
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 7:06 am
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28596 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 7:07 am to
Where’s the “takeover” part?

Sounds like they are actually considering building or buying a refinery to keep the flow of higher cost California blend flowing.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 7:15 am to
Well they’re “taking over” refineries because the intelligent and competent people have determined that it’s becoming unprofitable to operate in California.

Any competent government would make policies that are more business friendly.
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
26708 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Best thing one can do is open a car dealership on the Nevada side of the Nevada/California border.


And best thing a car manufacturer can do is freeze the 2034 model and continue labeling it that for many years
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27793 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 7:19 am to
Who would want to work in a refinery for the state of California? The best people at those places would GTFO of there?
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39659 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 7:31 am to
As is Chevron.


Welcome to Texas, CVX.
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
10410 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 7:37 am to
The supply issue is caused by the California government to begin with. They penalize and tax the crap out of any O&G company that wants to do business in the state, so they just quit producing or selling their product in the state. Ask yourself why gas costs several more dollars per gallon in Cali than in any other state, and that's only with government caps on price. Those companies aren't making money. Case in point: Phillips 66 shutting down in California.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40361 posts
Posted on 2/18/25 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Best thing one can do is open a car dealership on the Nevada side of the Nevada/California border.



There is a railyard in Arizona that does this with propane to southern cal
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram