- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Discussion Thread
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:04 pm to BROpaneTANK
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:04 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:
If he was standing between a looter and a store with a gun, he’d have no legal authority to discharge his firearm to stop them from robbing said store.
You may absolutely use "reasonable force" to protect someone else's property. Standing between a rioter while holding a gun should not be unreasonable. And the second that that piece of shite attacks you with deadly force, you can reciprocate
0
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:04 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:
But if those people walk right past you and break a window, you do not have the. Right to shoot them. Literally my only point.
So what's the point of this in this thread about the Rittenhouse trial? When did this happen?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:05 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
Insurance doesn’t stop fire from destroying everything you worked for.
quote:
It don’t, but it gives you money to build new again
It absolutely does not.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:05 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:no, you are completely missing what my response was to you and what you originally posted.
I think you’re intentionally ignoring pretty much everything I’m saying.
quote:it may have been your only point, but what you stated was much broader than that.
But if those people walk right past you and break a window, you do not have the. Right to shoot them. Literally my only point.
quote:
But no part of why he went there with a weapon was something he was legally authorized to do
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:05 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
What are you thoughts on Rittenhouse with that in mind?
You think the progressives wouldn’t be right there with them in support?
Chalmetteowl’s opinion wouldn’t change.
It isn’t the group performing the act that they support.
It is the act itself and the target they oppose.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:06 pm to Scruffy
C in z's take on this should be enlightening
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:07 pm to upgrayedd
quote:You know his position.
C in z's take on this should be enlightening
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:07 pm to Scruffy
quote:
You know his position
Yeah, whatever LeBron's position happens to be
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:07 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
was that business insured?
So it’s ok to go burning down someone’s business because it’s insured. Never mind the lost wages, the time spent rebuilding the place that is now more expensive than the insurance policy entails, your employees losing their jobs that aren’t part of the policy, the mental stress, and just encouraging violence in general. Next time you go burn down someone’s property, I hope you run into someone like Kyle Rittenhouse. You are an evil, selfish scumbag who has absolutely no empathy for anyone who disagrees with you. You will excuse literally anything your side does no matter how foul. Bet you blamed David Dorn for his death as well didn’t you?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:08 pm to wadewilson
quote:
absolutely does not.
Then why would people buy it? Why would my car dealership and mortgage company require it?
Bottom line if the police do their job, Kyle Rittenhouse doesn’t think he has to be there
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:09 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Lol
100% bait
Get fricked
SNL last year literally told their viewers to go burn down private businesses if Chauvin was acquitted since they have insurance. They say that from their Manhattan high rises and laugh at the peasants as the world burns.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:10 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
was that business insured?
Would you let someone burn down your house just because you had insurance?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:10 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
was that business insured?
Show me someone that produces this stupid talking point and I will show you someone who has never filed an insurance claim for anything significant in their life.
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:10 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
was that business insured?
Your thought process is an inch wide and an inch deep.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:10 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
It don’t, but it gives you money to build new again
Tell that to my parents that are still displaced from Ida.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:11 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
Then why would people buy it? Why would my car dealership and mortgage company require it?
See the post above yous. Building and maintaining a business takes a lot more than just brick and mortar.
If I'm a business owner, even if every dime of payroll, every hours worth of lost wages, every single employee that never comes back, even if my insurance provider will cover every single expense and my business comes back just the way it was, I'm still shooting the motherfricker that tries to burn it until I see his soul leave his body, because frick 'em.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:11 pm to dgnx6
Defense moves for mistrial
Here we go
Here we go
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:11 pm to dgnx6
Here we go
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:12 pm to jaytothen
quote:Whoa!
Defense moves for mistrial
With prejudice?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:12 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Tell that to my parents that are still displaced from Ida.
These people are fricking morons that just repeat some stupid thing they have read from some other moron.
They have no clue about real life and how stuff like insurance really works.
Page 19 of 115
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News