Started By
Message

re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only

Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:43 am to
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15096 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:43 am to
quote:


Not knowing any details, but can't the lens be broken, yet the light still work?


The current condition of the taillight shows that the diffusers are broken. The taillight is designed with a single small LED that shines into a diffuser, which spreads the light evenly across a larger area. When the diffuser is damaged, it can no longer distribute the light properly, so instead of a uniform glow, you only see a concentrated point of light from the LED.

to short answer your question is no because of the damaged diffusers.
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
6587 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:47 am to
Not familiar with this one at all


Did the prosecutor put Proctor on the stand ? If so, did he testify at all about Sullivan’s statement ? Seems like the prosecutors may have big problems ahead.
Posted by BR Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2004
4740 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:07 am to
quote:

Did the prosecutor put Proctor on the stand ? If so, did he testify at all about Sullivan’s statement ? Seems like the prosecutors may have big problems ahead.


IIRC Proctor testified during the first trial but not the second. I don’t recall him testifying about Sullivans statement, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15096 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:26 am to
quote:

Did the prosecutor put Proctor on the stand ? If so, did he testify at all about Sullivan’s statement ?


Proctor was called by the prosecutor in the first trial and he was not asked any questions about Sullivan's statements.

Proctor was not called by the prosecutor in the second trial. Becuase by the time the second trial rolled around the prosecutors office had Proctor's phone extraction.
Posted by ILurkThereforeIAm
In the Shadows, Behind Hedges
Member since Aug 2020
864 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:11 am to
I haven't been following much since the trial ended, so I had to look it up. WOW. That's some disturbing shite.

CBS News Article on Proctor Texts
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
97842 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Sullivan was never called in either trial and Lally never informed Karen Reads lawyers about his meeting with Sullivan.



When withholding potential evidence goes wrong.
Posted by 10tiger
Member since Jan 2021
289 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:32 am to
quote:

When withholding potential evidence goes wrong.


You ain’t lying. And this is tip of the iceberg. I am reallllly interested in eventually knowing what was deemed inadmissible by the judge that would have benefitted Karen regarding what evidence was found in the house.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
46392 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Not knowing any details, but can't the lens be broken, yet the light still work?


Yes, but there will be a color difference between where the red cover is there and where there are cracks.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
46392 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

am reallllly interested in eventually knowing what was deemed inadmissible by the judge that would have benefitted Karen regarding what evidence was found in the house


Aunt Bev catching a fatal stray from this trial would be amazing, metaphorically speaking.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15096 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:28 pm to
The text messages of another cop involved with this case have been released now, and they are possibly worse than Proctors text.

For example Sean Goode talks about running the license plate of a 25yr old “smoke” to see how she is.

He talked about sleeping while on detail, and the text have all the same hate as Proctor if not more.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15096 posts
Posted on 7/2/26 at 8:50 am to
A hearing was held yesterday and the judge made almost all of the lawyers show up in person. The judge also ordered every lawyer in the wrongful death case the O'keefe's filled against Karen Read to file a sworn affidavit in regards to any knowledge of leaks of impounded material.

The judge walked in the courtroom, read a prewritten statement then stormed out the courtroom. During the statement the judge threatened to stop the deposition of Michael Proctor, even default judgement or dismissal.

During the statement the judge stated that all of this was essentially about a X post at 2:52pm on June 8th. There are two possible posts that could match that.

One was by Grant Smith Ellis and this post was copies of a filed court doc that was NOT impounded and still available on the docket.

The other post was by Turtleboy that was posted at 10:52am on June 8th (which is 2:52pm UTC). This post was about Proctor being at a mental instution in Florida, but based on the time it was posted it posted before the filing was emailed to all of the lawyers in the case. So it could not have come from one of the lawyers in the case.

But what we do know for a fact now is that Michael Proctor is in a mental institution, and that is probably a good place for him.
Jump to page
Page First 158 159 160
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 160 of 160Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram