- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:22 pm to KosmoCramer
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:22 pm to KosmoCramer
Vinnie says it looks like something may be happening. He hasn't heard anything, but there's other movement. Some woman who is in touch with Karen Read is starting to take videos of the people gathering where the attorneys usually drive up. She hasn't said anything, though, per Vinnie.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:22 pm to KosmoCramer
That's really fricked up.
If they are only hung on that one lesser charge, but agree NG on the serious charges, the state can retry on the serious charges again?
If they are only hung on that one lesser charge, but agree NG on the serious charges, the state can retry on the serious charges again?
This post was edited on 6/17/25 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:27 pm to TigerBait1971
quote:
If they are only hung on that one lesser charge, but agree NG on the serious charges, the state can retry on the serious charges again?
Kosmos says they cannot based on his understanding, Wiseguy seems to think they can retry everything in Charge 2 again.
This is why the matter is messed up and Bev not answer that question to them a short time ago is fricked up too
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:30 pm to TigerBait1971
They can try her 100 times, I can't see a jury unanimously convicting her of murder unless the 12 person jury is all police workers.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:30 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:The Chrisley's too were done in by corruption before Trump's pardon righted that ship.
It's not the norm, but Rittenhouse was similar, as was Hannah Gutierrez-Reed and Baldwin was going down that road until the mistrial with prejudice.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:31 pm to sosaysmorvant
Or she runs out of money for legit experts and attorneys..
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:33 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Kosmos says they cannot based on his understanding, Wiseguy seems to think they can retry everything in Charge 2 again.
This is why the matter is messed up and Bev not answer that question to them a short time ago is fricked up too
I could be wrong, but it would definitely be appealed if they came back with that verdict. I would think there would be significant double jeopardy concerns with making a distinction like that.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:34 pm to JDPndahizzy
She'll be able to pay them back 10-fold when this is all over with a book/documentary.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:36 pm to KosmoCramer
Vinnie says there's been an obvious increase in security in front of the courthouse. It's 3:30 there, though, and the attorneys were told to be in the courthouse each day by 4 pm before the judge releases the jury for the day or asks if they want to keep going.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:37 pm to IT_Dawg
Yes, see my post, 2nd one on Page 133, thats what they were asking.
They evidently know there was no collision, so thats why they asked it that way.
They evidently know there was no collision, so thats why they asked it that way.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:38 pm to Saintsisit
sounds like no verdict today
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:38 pm to civiltiger07
Defense team has arrived.
ETA: Karen Read did the heart sign, blew kisses and gave a thumbs up with a big smile.
ETA: Karen Read did the heart sign, blew kisses and gave a thumbs up with a big smile.
This post was edited on 6/17/25 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:39 pm to Gris Gris
Could just be the 4pm dismissal
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:40 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Could just be the 4pm dismissal
Could be, but Vinnie says the increased security "may" indicate otherwise.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:49 pm to Gris Gris
Looks like everyone sent home.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:53 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Looks like everyone sent home.
Yep and court adjourned for the day leaving early. Disappointing.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:54 pm to AlxTgr
Thursday court is out. There was debate whether in the pretrial process of Friday was identified as an off day as well. Four days without deliberations would make this a total shite show.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 2:56 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Four days without deliberations would make this a total shite show.
Bev already has her weekend at the cape planned and she ain't about to let some trial get in her way.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 3:01 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:It already is. And I'm only talking about the deliberation part, the whole trial itself not withstanding.
Four days without deliberations would make this a total shite show.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 3:07 pm to Saintsisit
quote:
Yes, see my post, 2nd one on Page 133, thats what they were asking.
They evidently know there was no collision, so thats why they asked it that way.
I mean, they could be hung on Motor Vehicle Homicide too, based on how they worded their 4th question.
Either way, Bev should have answer that question instead of saying she won’t respond to theoreticals
This post was edited on 6/17/25 at 3:09 pm
Popular
Back to top



1




