- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kappa Kappa Gamma Women Lose Last-Ditch Appeal To Remove “Voyeuristic” Trans
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:00 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:00 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
yes, this screams "principles"
Yes, it does. The implication of the "slippery slope argument" I see made on TD is that we shouldn't have allowed gay marriage, not because gay marriage is inherently problematic, but because it might lead to other bad things. That's misguided pragmatism, not principles.
quote:
almost every vocal "libertarian" i know is a degenerate loser scumbag. see our friend roger for reference.
Roger isn't a libertarian, whether self proclaimed or otherwise. In fact, he resents us quite fervently
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:00 pm to baldona
quote:
What were they thinking when they have that freak a bid?
This. How can you bitch about a pledge that you gave a bid to?
I think he got a bid at a small school somewhere else at a chapter that needed members. And then transferred to the current school because it was full of hotties.
Basically the whole thing was premeditated. Which goes to show just how diabolical this freak really is
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:10 pm to loogaroo
I would imagine that there are a few baws at U of W or just random Baws in Laramie that would gladly remove that boy
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:10 pm to MrLSU
quote:
Shooters gonna shoot
This little freak is playing them all.
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:11 pm to Joshjrn
quote:plenty of people here (and elsewhere) see it as inherently problematic.
see made on TD is that we shouldn't have allowed gay marriage, not because gay marriage is inherently problematic,
quote:muh no true scotsman
Roger isn't a libertarian, whether self proclaimed or otherwise. In fact, he resents us quite fervently
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:17 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
muh no true scotsman
Just because he doesn't like Trump doesn't make him a libertarian
He doesn't ascribe to the NAP. It's not like I'm slicing up minarchists and anarcho-capitalists; if the NAP isn't your underlying principle, you're not a libertarian, by definition.
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:25 pm to loogaroo
would never had happened if the 19th Amendment had been rejected
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:26 pm to loogaroo
Shell Kell, Katie Whit and Hannah Lee are rolling over in their suburban king beds.

Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:33 pm to loogaroo
Ok. So it is allowed to stay in the house.
Can they find some sort of sexual harassment then? For getting an erection while watching someone undress
Can they find some sort of sexual harassment then? For getting an erection while watching someone undress
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:41 pm to loogaroo
Best part about this is that women getting the right to vote is probably the greatest reason for this happening.
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:44 pm to loogaroo
Those college girls will enthusiastically vote Democrat without the slightest bit of reflection.
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:48 pm to loogaroo
Our legal system is an absolute joke
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:52 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Ok. So it is allowed to stay in the house.
Can they find some sort of sexual harassment then? For getting an erection while watching someone undress
Better yet...Why would they undress in front of it in the first place?
So many unanswered questions.
Fact still remains, this little pervert is getting its way.
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:55 pm to loogaroo
quote:is it possible he just had excessive tenting of his pants in that area?
the women have alleged has “watched” them undress with a visible erection
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:56 pm to Chicken
It's possible. Seems like a hefty fella, so pleats are in play.
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:58 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
if the NAP isn't your underlying principle, you're not a libertarian, by definition.
NAP is the underlying ethos of anglosphere, particularly in modern times. how we slice it is it up for debate, and rightfully so, because most people grow out of their libertarian phase after college when they realize NAP as a broad concept has not nor ever will exist in civilized society outside of personal interaction with previously known persons. it’s against our basic evolutionary biology
you’ve argued for multiple pages that the slippery slope in the absence of ossified principles leads to irrational decision making, regardless of whether the outcomes that people warned of come to pass. those “principles”, in multiple cases just within the last 30 years, have given us the antisocial behaviors we are currently forced to tolerate. every American has a libertarian bent in one form or another, but it has massed into full view today. it’s ok to have malleable views, otherwise you’re a psychopath who is content with seeing the civilization burn just to point into the void and say “see, I was right.”
I think caution and sobriety leads to better outcomes. NAP is an academic myth meant for a better humanity than currently exists
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:59 pm to GRTiger
I wonder how many pairs of panties those poor girls are missing.
Posted on 6/18/24 at 8:59 pm to loogaroo
1) how did this thing get a bid??
2) the clash between women’s rights and trans rights, if properly exploited, could lead to the downfall of the Democrat party
3) if in 2015 they started allowing trans to get a bid, why did the current 6 members even join??
4) courts have food reason to shy away from intra-organization bylaw squabbles.
2) the clash between women’s rights and trans rights, if properly exploited, could lead to the downfall of the Democrat party
3) if in 2015 they started allowing trans to get a bid, why did the current 6 members even join??
4) courts have food reason to shy away from intra-organization bylaw squabbles.
This post was edited on 6/18/24 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 6/18/24 at 9:01 pm to loogaroo
This would make an awesome premise for a Revenge of the Nerds 5!
Popular
Back to top



1










