- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge is a d-bag to IT guy who fixes his audio issues
Posted on 4/1/26 at 12:41 pm to NIH
Posted on 4/1/26 at 12:41 pm to NIH
Have yet to see a single post expand on the events relating to the IT guy.
Now I understand that there are people of sufficiently low IQ that they believe that if you find other videos of a person running a tight ship in his courtroom that means you don't need many details about a specific case. I'm just not one of them.
Surely that judge is NEVER justified in getting angry and we never need to know much of anything to say so. Every 10-20 second video contains all the information we need.
Now I understand that there are people of sufficiently low IQ that they believe that if you find other videos of a person running a tight ship in his courtroom that means you don't need many details about a specific case. I'm just not one of them.
Surely that judge is NEVER justified in getting angry and we never need to know much of anything to say so. Every 10-20 second video contains all the information we need.
3
Posted on 4/1/26 at 12:42 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
Not just video. Entire emails. Guess they are out of context too.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 12:50 pm to Morgus
quote:
Have yet to see a single post expand on the events relating to the IT guy.
Because you aren’t reading them. Did you just miss out on the news article of him hauling a lawyer to his courtroom in response to an email saying he should apologize on a pretext of it being ex parte……except the lawyer has zero cases on the current or future docket. It was back on page 4.
What about the multiple posts of him treating others in entirely separate situations the same way. Still worthy of the benefit of the doubt because they were misunderstandings as well?
Posted on 4/1/26 at 12:52 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
quote:
Remember after that event when video after video was posted of that kid being a complete shithead to everyone? Oh wait, that was this judge you're defending.
"We don't need more information than a 20-second video with little context because we have other unrelated 20-second videos without context too!"
Judges get angry. If all you have to do is string together snapshots in time of someone getting angry to "prove" any given snapshot is never understandable then it will never will be for anyone routinely filmed on the job. Maybe him blasting the IT guy wasn't justified at all and there is no history that might reveal otherwise. But we just don't have enough information to say this.
Social media has turned the world into a Jerry Springer audience.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 12:54 pm to Morgus
quote:
Social media has turned the world into a Jerry Springer audience.
There is some irony here that you're missing.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 12:59 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Because you aren’t reading them. Did you just miss out on the news article of him hauling a lawyer...
That expands on the events relating to the IT guy? Is the IT guy also the lawyer that got hauled before his court? Maybe it's you who need help with reading.
quote:
What about the multiple posts of him treating others in entirely separate situations the same way. Still worthy of the benefit of the doubt because they were misunderstandings as well?
You mean the other clips that also lack much context?
This is why internet mobs are so easily formed I tell ya. Be less eager to join them.
This post was edited on 4/1/26 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 4/1/26 at 1:01 pm to Morgus
quote:
If all you have to do is string together snapshots in time of someone getting angry to "prove" any given snapshot is never understandable then it will never will be for anyone routinely filmed on the job.
Ever heard of character witnesses or prior acts?
Posted on 4/1/26 at 1:02 pm to Ingeniero
A judge with balls wouldn't need a mic.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 1:03 pm to Morgus
quote:
You mean the other clips that also lack much context?
Dismissing every other corroborating piece of evidence as "no context" is a choice
Posted on 4/1/26 at 1:06 pm to Morgus
quote:
Morgus
Post less
Posted on 4/1/26 at 1:23 pm to TheOcean
Man I'm watching that video now and he's a count to lawyers simply asking for a continuance.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 1:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
You are just watching it out of context.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 1:26 pm to Volvagia
Also he gets to a person using a translator and instead of explaining it, he's just a dick to her about it.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:16 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
This. I’ve been “the guy who is good with computers” at every office I’ve ever worked in. And the joke is always that my mere presence can fix problems, as by time I walk up, they can’t replicate.
I have been here myself. I just tell them electronics are scared of me.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:20 pm to DarthGadget
____________________________________________
Judges are sometimes really bad with technology.
There are still US Circuit and US District (senior lifetime Article 3) judges that are essentially baffled at anything beyond email. They are incredibly smart people, and have keen legal minds. Tech does not always fit that kind of brain, and they often have always had a clerk / wife / kid do the heavy tech lifting over the last 25 years. They are not going to learn tech at this late date in their judgeship.
_________________________
I would like to humbly apologize to the OT for *appearing* to defend His Rudeness. I was only attempting to possibly explain his frustration.
Judges are sometimes really bad with technology.
There are still US Circuit and US District (senior lifetime Article 3) judges that are essentially baffled at anything beyond email. They are incredibly smart people, and have keen legal minds. Tech does not always fit that kind of brain, and they often have always had a clerk / wife / kid do the heavy tech lifting over the last 25 years. They are not going to learn tech at this late date in their judgeship.
_________________________
I would like to humbly apologize to the OT for *appearing* to defend His Rudeness. I was only attempting to possibly explain his frustration.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:37 pm to Morgus
quote:
You mean the other clips that also lack much context?
This is why internet mobs are so easily formed I tell ya. Be less eager to join them.
Is this guy your brother or something? What an odd hill to die on.
How many 20 second clips and stories of this guy being a complete a-hole do you need to see for you to believe that this is guy is probably just the jerkoff he appears to be?
I guess you could you watch 50 videos of this guy being an arse an none of them matter because they are only 20 seconds long?
Posted on 4/1/26 at 2:42 pm to iwyLSUiwy
or take my word for it
Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
He's a count to everyone. Imagine working for that dude
Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:07 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
If that was me I would have laughed and said thank goodness it was just a false alarm and had levity.
If that was me I would have told him to eat a dick. frick that POS.
I was referring to the A-hole judge laughing it off, but I would have no issue with that either.
Posted on 4/1/26 at 3:45 pm to Jake88
quote:
I've seen a judge or two berate the courtroom personel regularly. This dude isn't anything.
Being confused about the meaning of "ex parte" is a bit of a problem.
Ordering an attorney w/ no business in his court to appear before him is crazy.
Thinking that all his emails - including the ones to the District Clerk's office - are "an order" is crazy.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News