DarthGadget

The YouTube algorithm sent me a healthy stream of Karoline Leavitt hate video from other women tonight.

I watched ONE caustic video suggested by the YT TV app (a "guest" account, not logged into YT), so of course the algorithm suggested more title cards on about every third line.

I was surprised by the raw viscous hate of female attacking female of the one vid that I did watch. This was not like the usual talking head making a case on a political or performance basis that I am used to, it was raw, unfiltered, and a very personal attack. Just plain hate.

No more sticking together for girl power; they now eat their own for the tribe.

Squeeze me baby ..
(Blues Guitar Pull)
Till the log rolls down my leg...

Do, squeeze, squeeze me, baby, until the log rolls down my leg
The way you squeeze my turd cutter
I'm gonna fall right outta bed, bed, yeah

???

The Internet is evil and dangerous.

If anything good ever came out of social media, it is the lifting of the veil on marriage.

I had friends that absolutely got hammered and are still dealing with the aftermath decades later. One of the nicest guys I ever met got totally killed by a smooth operator; I am convinced it was a set up from the first date.

Young men of today can see the whole picture play out, not just see their own chase and target. They see the state enforced arse ripping that they will likely endure, and at minimum have some tools to make informed judgements and better decisions if they choose to. They can look past the social media divas and tattooed attention seekers, and are equipped to possibly identify danger.

I got married late in life and I love my wife. Had MGTOW been a 'thing' then, I would have had second thoughts. I lucked out ---cause I had no access to YouTube "wisdom", differing points of view, or discussion that is available today at the click of a mouse.

Somewhere on YouTube is an analysis of what Paul McCartney likely paid in his divorce settlement to bang Heather Mills while they were married...it was nearly a quarter million per pop.

At one point, the CX-5 was 60% of Mazda's sales...maybe still is. Solid car. Mazda is becoming (after they got un-Ford-ed) the cheaper and 'as reliable' Toyota.

BTW...not well known...the bigger CX-50 uses Toyota's 2.5L 4-cylinder engine, electronic CVT (eCVT), and hybrid system.

Non-Turbo Toyota/Lexus is almost a cant miss.

After that ...ahem....

Th GM 3.6 in their mid size SUV's is decent, EXCEPT for the mile-long timing chain is always a problem later...even with perfect maintenance.

Subaru's seem to be having problems lately.

I am almost convinced Nissan is going to make so much cash with the only decent non-turbo V6 small truck on the market and come out with a killer line up...or die.

Not that I am suggesting this one...but...I was in the same 'need an SUV ' spot a few years back. Got wife an Alfa Romeo Stelvio. Most amazing SUV ever; to include the X3. Alfa dealership closed a month after purchase, so did many others, and the brand collapsed in the US. Alfa's chance at redemption glory was blown. The car...103,000 and going strong. No problems. Extended warranty expires January 2027. Definitely not an Alfa of old; I am a car guy and am very glad we got to have a Stelvio. She loves the mid SUV thing -> probably a CX-5 incoming.

Very sad. The world is a tough place, and fame often exacts a high price.

Some wonder if they sell their soul to be famous...

Some think that is exactly what is taken.

I find that picture disturbing.

I agree with whoever said to outlaw plastic surgery.

Be Eva Marie Saint instead !

The end scene in "Please Remain Calm" where to they go in to open the sluice gates, and the dosimeters are going nuts while the lights drop out and it fades to black...the hairs on the back of my neck stood straight up !

Been a while since a TV show did that to me.

____________________________________________

Judges are sometimes really bad with technology.

There are still US Circuit and US District (senior lifetime Article 3) judges that are essentially baffled at anything beyond email. They are incredibly smart people, and have keen legal minds. Tech does not always fit that kind of brain, and they often have always had a clerk / wife / kid do the heavy tech lifting over the last 25 years. They are not going to learn tech at this late date in their judgeship.

_________________________

I would like to humbly apologize to the OT for *appearing* to defend His Rudeness. I was only attempting to possibly explain his frustration.

Judges are sometimes really bad with technology.

There are still US Circuit and US District (senior lifetime Article 3) judges that are essentially baffled at anything beyond email. They are incredibly smart people, and have keen legal minds. Tech does not always fit that kind of brain, and they often have always had a clerk / wife / kid do the heavy tech lifting over the last 25 years. They are not going to learn tech at this late date in their judgeship.

Legal people that are over 60-65ish today are the last group that will be able to work in that field without knowing more than how to email or Westlaw.

(well...except for maybe Samuel T. Cogley...lol)