- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: JBE suggests broad COVID vaccine mandates after FDA approval
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:10 am to Clark W Griswold
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:10 am to Clark W Griswold
I’m also fine with you staying home because you’re scared.
1
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:11 am to Jimmy2shoes
What’s wrong with this? Honestly?
quote:
”The COVID vaccine would then work just like other vaccines that are currently mandatory. There are a number of them that are on a schedule that the [Louisiana] Department of Health requires whether it’s K-12, higher education and so forth, subject to whatever opt-out provisions are in current law
“It would be my expectation that once full authorization or licensure is granted that the vaccines will be added to the list and work just like the current measles, mumps, rubella,” he said.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:11 am to BHS78
quote:
Will people be able to sue the manufacturer for harmful side effects like every other approved drug?
I may be wrong but as I understand it, no
This is 75% of why I am not interested in taking if
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:12 am to ShoeBang
quote:
Will the legal liability for adverse effects be removed from either Louisiana or the Manufacturers?
It is my understanding that it will not because vaccines in general are exempt from liability.
I could be wrong but that is my understanding....imagine giving big pharma immunity from COVID vaccine adverse effects but not giving immunity to businesses from lawsuits if people contract it in your business.
That right there should show people what side your government is on....hint it's not yours.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:13 am to ShoeBang
quote:So you have never taken a single vaccine?
Will the legal liability for adverse effects be removed from either Louisiana or the Manufacturers?
If not, they can all frick off.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:13 am to lsupride87
quote:
What’s wrong with this? Honestly?
quote:
K-12
The survival rate in the age group does not support making it mandatory for them.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:14 am to tiger91
quote:
I can only pray that the next few years come quickly and gets these asshats out of office.
So what? The dumbass electorate of this state can elect JBE 2.0?
JBE isn’t the problem; he’s merely a symptom of it.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:14 am to lsupride87
because this isn’t a job or an institution that an individual could simply not participate or involve themselves with.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 8:21 am
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:14 am to thermal9221
quote:
What will be the reasoning for people not getting it once fda clears it?
Natural immunity
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:14 am to Jimmy2shoes
I think vaccines should be encouraged . But that’s where his authority ends.
Vaccines should not be mandated by the state for the general public.
Vaccines should not be mandated by the state for the general public.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 8:15 am
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:14 am to BHS78
quote:
Will people be able to sue the manufacturer for harmful side effects like every other approved drug?
If it is forced upon people IMO they should be able to sue the government entity that mandated it
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:15 am to BallsEleven
quote:Have you checked out the current survival rate for mumps which they are required to take?
The survival rate in the age group does not support making it mandatory for them.
The current survival rate of mumps is 99.994%
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:16 am to lsupride87
quote:
What’s wrong with this? Honestly?
It's still obviously a politically rushed process. It violates informed consent, it opens the door to be controlled by the govt/pharma industrial complex based on your medical status.
There's lots of reasons.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:16 am to Jimmy2shoes
Forced mandates. So who is responsible for adverse reactions? It won’t be the drug company. I think it should be on whoever is forcing the jab.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:16 am to LSU2001
quote:
I don’t think the reasoning matters. If a person does not wish to receive the vaccine then that is there God Given right. I don’t feel that anyone should have to supply any reasoning at all.
Feel the same about hepatitis, measles, polio vaccines?
quote:
I am vaccinated and think everyone should get the jab but that is a choice, frick mandating it!
I used to agree with this but until % vaccinated reaches levels of other commonly administered vaccines I am not sure what to think.
I am tired of living under constant threat of government lock down state and mask mandate, all entirely preventable by just opting to take a widely available vaccine.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:16 am to goofball
quote:Have you always been on this crusade? Or were you part of the OT and PT that made fun of the granola moms in California that caused the mumps outbreaks?
Vaccines should not be mandated by the state for the general public.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:16 am to lsupride87
quote:
The current survival rate of mumps is 99.994%
What's in the mumps shot?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:17 am to Jimmy2shoes
He's such a frick
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:17 am to Jimmy2shoes
Well at the very least he accepts that it has to have FDA approval.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 8:17 am to lsupride87
quote:
The current survival rate of mumps is 99.994%
you’re ignoring a lot of other factors of the situation by boiling it down to simply survival rate. you know that.
Page 2 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News