Started By
Message

re: Israel Pfizer efficacy against covid-19 hospitalizations broken down by age group

Posted on 8/18/21 at 8:21 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108206 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

group
Can we please quit worrying about Covid? It’s not Ebola!!!

Covid actually kills way more people than Ebola

Not as high as mortality rate, but that actually helps this virus kill more
This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 8:22 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
41916 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Does that make it no longer up to you to maintain your vax status?


I’m not anti-vaxx, but a lifetime of boosters doesn’t make me want to get the shot.

I have had Covid and at this point, I will gamble on my on natural immunity being able to protect me (at least to a large degree).
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

They’re about putting the group above oneself


unfortunately that's not the reality

if it were, we would be giving vaccines out to the vulnerable and older populations in other countries who do not have access

it's actually unethical to force guys like me to get one when others actually need it
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40212 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

6’2” 175? dude needs to hit the weight room.


6'2" 175 is a normal weight. That's a BMI of 23. Overweight starts at 25.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
17137 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

That's how it should go. People should make a personal decision whether they want to get the vaccine or not.

Let me ask you (and anyone willing to answer) a question.
The vaccine is free. If it weren't free, how much would you be willing to pay for the vaccine to get the additional protection that the vaccine offers?



I'd probably pay up to about $35 for it.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33346 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Does that make it no longer up to you to maintain your vax status?

That must have sounded better in your head.

Its Aug and some are now on shot #3, can we make it to Jan before shot #4? Due to a vaccine resistant strain popping up during winter? And do you realistically believe that 330M Americans can logistically get shots 1-3 by wintertime, if not already vaxed?

And which shot number is your limit? If after 5 shots your body reacts to the vaccine just as it would to corona, do you say 'No More'? Then youre just as unvaccinated as the guy that never got his 1st shot
This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 9:42 pm
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
76139 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

I’m not anti-vaxx, but a lifetime of boosters doesn’t make me want to get the shot.


It's more deadly than flu shot and about half of Americans get that. A lot of parents give their infants the flu shot.

I don't expect 90% of Americans to maintain their covid shot unless covid remains an issue.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
18713 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

This has been the biggest failure by those in charge. They've pushed fear that is completely unjustified to try to get compliance. Now they must deal with a sizeable portion of society that doesn't trust anything they say, and frankly I don't blame anyone that doesn't trust them.

Posted by pigskinGod
Member since Sep 2020
1573 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

A maximum of 6.2 severe cases per 100,000 for anyone under 40 and unvaccinated but yeah we need to vaxxx everyone over 12


This is a percentage of 0.0062.

quote:

Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. More than 357 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through August 16, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 6,789 reports of death (0.0019%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause. Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. A review of available clinical information, including death certificates

For anyone younger than 30 its 0.0015% severe cases.
CDC

ETA: this is the point we are at. People will downvote raw data because it doesn't support their view that everyone should be vaxxed. You are anti-science pieces of shite.
This post was edited on 8/19/21 at 2:05 pm
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

A maximum of 6.2 severe cases per 100,000


So about the odds for any other sickness or disease

Also, significantly less than any Dim city murder rate
This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 10:49 pm
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
76139 posts
Posted on 8/18/21 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

Also, significantly less than any Dim city murder rate




For my demographic dim city murder is much less than covid death.
This post was edited on 8/18/21 at 10:52 pm
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29044 posts
Posted on 8/19/21 at 12:36 am to
quote:

To make it slightly clearer, the OP data says that 1 out of 500k people aged 30-39 vaccinated will get a sever case while 31 out of 500k will get a severe case in not vaxxed.
No it doesn't.

OP's data says that 1/500k and 31/500k currently have a severe case of covid. This data is to compare risk of vaxed vs not, NOT the risk of ever contracting a severe infection at all.



If you want to figure the chance of will get a severe infection, you have to look at the current severe cases in terms of current infections and assume that everyone will be infected at some point. That means we have to take the 6.2/100k and 0.2/100k (the updated data is 8.8 and 0.5, so I will use these) and divide by current infections per 100k, which are presently 964/100k and 650/100k respectively.

So as a vaccinated 30-39 year old in Israel, you have approximately 0.5/650 = 0.08% chance of developing a severe illness if you contract covid. About 77/100k, or 384/500k to compare with your terms.

And as an unvaccinated 30-39 year old in Israel, you have approximately 8.8/964 = 0.9% chance of developing a severe illness if you contract covid. About 913/100k, or 4564/500k to compare with your terms.

But again, that assumes everyone is equally likely to contract covid at all, and that everyone will contract it eventually. Neither is quite true. To start, in the 30-39 age bracket in Israel, 78% are fully vaxed, and another 6% have one dose, so I will leave them out as done in OP's link. As above, current infections are 650 and 964, so (964/16)/(650/78) = 7.23. The unvaccinated are developing a detectable illness at roughly 7X the rate of the vaccinated.
This post was edited on 8/19/21 at 1:17 am
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
38359 posts
Posted on 8/19/21 at 1:03 am to
quote:

That’s not a lot. You know how many people live in Louisiana? People have lost all concept of reality when they hear Covid stats.
Given the vaccine is essentially risk-free, why would we just opt to have 100 more people in the hospital per day if it were easily preventable? Only in your warped world does 3000K/month admissions count as "not that many".
Posted by cable
Member since Oct 2018
9735 posts
Posted on 8/19/21 at 1:06 am to
I’m 6’2” - right around 185 is about perfect for me - 180 would be fine. I’m not trying to play middle linebacker for the Chiefs.
This post was edited on 8/19/21 at 1:37 am
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27832 posts
Posted on 8/19/21 at 6:18 am to
Same thing was the case in England.
Posted by lsu711
Member since Sep 2003
14703 posts
Posted on 8/19/21 at 6:38 am to
quote:

vaccines have never really been about individual risk. They’re about putting the group above oneself. They obviously limit your individual risk quite a bit, but, more importantly, they help slow/stop the spread of a virus altogether.


The vaccine doesn’t stop the spread. It masks the symptoms. The vaccinated are more likely to spread because we don’t know they are infected.
This post was edited on 8/19/21 at 7:52 am
Posted by SLafourche07
Member since Feb 2008
10037 posts
Posted on 8/19/21 at 6:49 am to
quote:

I’m 6’2” - right around 185 is about perfect for me - 180 would be fine. I’m not trying to play middle linebacker for the Chiefs.




I’m 6’2” (Maybe 6’3” which I guess would throw this all off) and 195 right now.

So my BMI would be 25 and right on the cusp of overweight. Which personally I think is insane, but whatever.

If I would get down to 185 much less 180 I would have visible abs all of the time.

As it stands now if I skip lunch or am dehydrated you can start to see some ablines.

Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
13782 posts
Posted on 8/19/21 at 11:03 am to
shite got real around August 1, the data is almost useless. It was barely a blip during the time this data was collected.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108206 posts
Posted on 8/19/21 at 11:44 am to
quote:

shite got real around August 1, the data is almost useless
You might want to take your head, and remove it from your arse

shite got real in early July for Israel
Posted by Buryl
Member since Sep 2016
1022 posts
Posted on 8/19/21 at 12:21 pm to
quote:


To make it slightly clearer, the OP data says that 1 out of 500k people aged 30-39 vaccinated will get a sever case while 31 out of 500k will get a severe case in not vaxxed.


quote:


No it doesn't.

OP's data says that 1/500k and 31/500k currently have a severe case of covid. This data is to compare risk of vaxed vs not, NOT the risk of ever contracting a severe infection at all.


If you want to figure the chance of will get a severe infection, you have to look at the current severe cases in terms of current infections and assume that everyone will be infected at some point. That means we have to take the 6.2/100k and 0.2/100k (the updated data is 8.8 and 0.5, so I will use these) and divide by current infections per 100k, which are presently 964/100k and 650/100k respectively.

So as a vaccinated 30-39 year old in Israel, you have approximately 0.5/650 = 0.08% chance of developing a severe illness if you contract covid. About 77/100k, or 384/500k to compare with your terms.

And as an unvaccinated 30-39 year old in Israel, you have approximately 8.8/964 = 0.9% chance of developing a severe illness if you contract covid. About 913/100k, or 4564/500k to compare with your terms.

But again, that assumes everyone is equally likely to contract covid at all, and that everyone will contract it eventually. Neither is quite true. To start, in the 30-39 age bracket in Israel, 78% are fully vaxed, and another 6% have one dose, so I will leave them out as done in OP's link. As above, current infections are 650 and 964, so (964/16)/(650/78) = 7.23. The unvaccinated are developing a detectable illness at roughly 7X the rate of the vaccinated.



I was going to say the same thing, but you did it much better. Many are misinterpreting the data to assume the chart indicates OVERALL risk - The numbers are only valid to compare the two data points (vaccinated vs. unvaccinated).

Common sense should inform people that these cannot be the numbers of overall risk. For example, the numbers in the study show the number of severe cases for unvaccinated people is 16.4 per 100,000.

Applying these numbers to Louisiana, with 4.7 million population, and assuming EVERY SINGLE PERSON gets covid, you multiply 14.6 x 47 to get 785 total severe cases in the entire state. Again, assuming every single person contracts covid.

If there were only 785 severe cases, your average person probably wouldn't even be aware covid-19 exists. It would be noise in the background of existing coronaviruses that already infect hundreds of millions of people each year.


Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram