- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Is the Red Cross a bad organization?
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:11 pm
I've been seeing a lot of posts on social media saying not to donate to them. Instead, you should donate to local organizations.
What does the OT think?
What does the OT think?
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:12 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Salvation Army >>> Red Cross
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:12 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
I heard bad things about them last year during the floor
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:13 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Red Cross is like the IRS. They just want your money.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:15 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
not sure, but they were the first people into new orleans feeding first responders a day or 2 after Katrina
This post was edited on 8/27/17 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:15 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
Salvation Army >>> Red Cross
This is accurate. A lot more of their money goes direct to the source.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:16 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
You should always donate local if you can. Red Cross just seems like your wasting your money
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:16 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
The Red Cross really dropped the ball in the Louisiana flooding last year. If you do donate, make sure it goes specifically to Harvey disaster recovery and not just their general fund. I'd rather donate to the Salvation Army or something local.
This post was edited on 8/27/17 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:18 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Red Cross has been a bit exposed lately. Their donation percentages are low because of large administrative overhead and costs. They didn't do so hot in BR during and after the floods either.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:24 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
I can't complain. They paid for my hotel after Katrina. Unsolicited too...the front desk called and let me know they took care of it.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:26 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
I dont know, but my grandfather despises them. Hes gone now, but apparently they were a shitty group of people back around ww2.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:28 pm to kengel2
When they used funds to supply jena 6 protest i wrote them off
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:29 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Once the Red Cross took over a shelter, the only food allowed in that shelter was from approved vendors.
Several friends that flooded are more willing to sell their souls before giving a penny to the Red Cross, each for different reasons.
Several friends that flooded are more willing to sell their souls before giving a penny to the Red Cross, each for different reasons.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:30 pm to kengel2
Had a WW2 vet who fought in the pacific tell me the same thing.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:30 pm to bushwacker
quote:
supply jena 6 protest
Now there's a protest I hadn't heard about in a while
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:31 pm to kengel2
quote:
I dont know, but my grandfather despises them. Hes gone now, but apparently they were a shitty group of people back around ww2.
Yeah, I had a great-uncle who was a Marine on Iwo Jima. Until the day he died he held a grudge against the Red Cross because they SOLD donuts & coffee to returning servicemen, while the USO provided them at no cost.
I never had dealings w/ the Red Cross as a serviceman myself, but I can definitely vouch for the USO. It's legit.
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:31 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Yes. They have inordinately high "costs", meaning their executives pay themselves well. Meanwhile they were serving flood victims here in Baton Rouge four chicken nuggets as a "meal", all while turning down donations from local people in favor of distributing crap they were buying from their "partners".
frick the Red Cross.
frick the Red Cross.
This post was edited on 8/27/17 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:31 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
They're not bad but they do spend a shitload of money on advertising and overhead
Posted on 8/27/17 at 6:32 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
not sure, but they were the first people into new orleans feeding first responders a day or 2 after Katrina
Feeding people does not cost much and it is a feel good thing that people can see, the Red Cross is notorious for that type of thing. They will raise money after a disaster and only a small percentage of the money is applied to that disaster, they justify it by claiming they provided as much money as was needed and need the surplus funding available for future disasters so they can respond immediately.
Popular
Back to top


30









