Started By
Message

re: Is the Jaguar F Pace an OT-10 SUV?

Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:01 am to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139230 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:01 am to
That interior is very underwhelming
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79876 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:01 am to
The new model offers a 4 cyl....they killed the car

It's like the Mustang.
This post was edited on 1/24/18 at 10:02 am
Posted by trillhog
Elite Membership
Member since Jul 2011
19407 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:02 am to
quote:

That interior is very underwhelming


and the exhaust pipes are to small.



Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:02 am to
quote:


will also frick YOUR WALLET dry.


quote:


2018 Jaguar F-PACE · MSRP


$42,065 - $63,200


Hardly.....

They are small from when we looked. Neighbor has one in hunter green and it definitely isn't all that sexy in that color. Certainly doesn't look bad, but not enough that I'm gaga over it.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:04 am to
Not worried about what they offer in the base.

The big v8 is still nice. I just think the car looks great


Just saw your edit. Wait until I see you. Dead to me now
This post was edited on 1/24/18 at 10:12 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89398 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:06 am to
quote:

The new model offers a 4 cyl....they killed the car

It's like the Mustang.



Wut? First off the Ecoboost Mustang is pretty quick.

Second, they still have the 465hp GT that runs 11.7 in the 1/4 fully stock.
This post was edited on 1/24/18 at 10:06 am
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94730 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:07 am to
quote:


will also frick YOUR WALLET dry.



quote:

2018 Jaguar F-PACE · MSRP


$42,065 - $63,200



Hardly.....


have you ever OWNED a jaguar?
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:07 am to
Maserati SUV looks nice too. However, the base price is quite a bit more.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
36432 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:08 am to
I was disappointed until I saw the black on black.

That being said, I really, really dislike this bulging hood design everything seems to have these days. This isn't the most extreme example of it, but it still has the profile.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89398 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:10 am to
And they definitely need to do something with the exhaust for this to be an OT 10 SUV.

If I'm going with an unreliable, good-looking SUV, it'd be a Velar.


Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31201 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:12 am to
quote:

quote:

will also frick YOUR WALLET dry.


quote:

Hardly.....


The point was Jaguars are traditionally poorly built and cost a lot of money to run. Not as true as in the past but the reliability still lags behind most other brands.

Not a fan of the Jag SUVs.

While in a different price bracket the Cayenne GTS would be my overall choice if I had to drive an SUV/CUV as a daily.







Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
63520 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:14 am to
quote:

It's a rebadged Jeep



Wrong, no part of the Durango shares a common platform with any Jeep vehicle, frame, body, interior, drive train are all original design and engineering.



Posted by VaBamaMan
North AL
Member since Apr 2013
8330 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Maserati SUV looks nice too. However, the base price is quite a bit more.


And has the same base equipment as the Dodge Durango, for a $80,000ish base price. To get one as well equipped as the base Jag, you'll pay over $100,000.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89398 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Wrong, no part of the Durango shares a common platform with any Jeep vehicle, frame, body, interior, drive train are all original design and engineering.




You're aware they both have the 3.6 Pentastar engine and offer the same 5.7 v8, right? That's just for starters.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87748 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:20 am to
Which version of the Nissan Murano is that, OP
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94730 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:21 am to
quote:


You're aware they both have the 3.6 Pentastar engine and offer the same 5.7 v8, right? That's just for starters.

Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
94730 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Which version of the Nissan Murano is that, OP


have you seen one IRL? its gorgeous.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
63520 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:22 am to
You’re right, forgot about the v-6

The 5.7 in the Durango is different however, and the trans is or at least was unique to the Durango
Posted by s14suspense
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
16178 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:25 am to


That gold you posted is bad. This on the other hand is good.
4.6s 0-60
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89398 posts
Posted on 1/24/18 at 10:25 am to
quote:

You’re right, forgot about the v-6

The 5.7 in the Durango is different however, and the trans is or at least was unique to the Durango


They're built on the same fricking platform . Sometimes it's best to not double down.
quote:

The third-generation Durango is built alongside the Jeep Grand Cherokee at the Jefferson Assembly Plant in Detroit, Michigan, sharing the assembly line, running gear, powertrains, and chassis parts with the Grand Cherokee.


Yes it has a slightly longer wheel base, but you're completely off with your comments.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram