Started By
Message

re: If you want to lose weight in 2024 avoid the ingestion of these two molecules.

Posted on 12/31/23 at 5:28 pm to
Posted by duckblind56
South of Ellick
Member since Sep 2023
2786 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

avoid the ingestion of these two molecules


2 = "anything white" = sugar, flour, bread, rice, potatoes, etc., etc
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
16434 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 5:30 pm to
Sugar is a poison that kills slowly, but effectively.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
33561 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

It is a stretch to blame obesity on sugar. Quite a stretch actually. It’s typical for today’s society who have to have a boogie man. The problem is people eat to much. Never in history has food been so cheap and easy to get. People with poor impulse control get fat. Lustig is the king of it isn’t your fault, it’s the evil sugar. It’s just nonsense.


You have said absolutely nothing here.

And you also erected a shitty straw man, of both my and Lustig’s statements.

Why do people eat too much? If they had only unlimited meat, fruit and vegetables at their disposal, would they be obese?

And no one said sugar as sugar is the problem. That’s why I qualified “in today’s parlance” and then explained what I meant: the use of isolated sugar in unnatural amounts and combinations with bad oils to create addictive shite-non-food bombs.

Do you think all of a sudden basic human impulse control changed? You can’t look at worldwide trends and question what may be causing massive obesity increases in a mere few decades, after thousands of years of human history?

I’m not a huge fan of Lustig’s activist bombast, but to equate blaming others with analyzing macro trends is an absurd false dilemma.

From what I’ve read from Lustig, he lays blame on a shitty food pyramid and other government acts and omissions, and a food industry that profits off of addictive, cheap unhealthy food.

Using terms like “hack,” “quack,” “bogeyman,” and “it’s quite a stretch actually” do absolutely nothing to prove any point you may have been trying to make.
Posted by MikeAV8s
Member since Oct 2016
2035 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:39 pm to
I don’t need to prove it. You haven’t proved anything either. We disagree and it appears you are really invested in your opinion. Lustig, in my opinion is a grifter. You have a different opinion. So be it.
Posted by Yellerhammer5
Member since Oct 2012
10891 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

Lustig is the king of it isn’t your fault, it’s the evil sugar.


It’s your fault for stuffing your face full of sugar.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
96646 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

If you want to lose weight in 2024


Develop a coke habit
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7630 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

If you want to lose weight in 2024 avoid the ingestion of these two molecules.

Just eat less than you burn, most people are sedentary and don’t burn enough to out run their appetite.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23363 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:08 pm to
I drink coke all day long, is it on list?
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
40454 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:09 pm to
You can avoid those 2, I’ll avoid semen and feces.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11304 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:16 pm to
Related:

https://www.mashed.com/200565/the-untold-truth-of-mexican-coke/

quote:

The Untold Truth Of Mexican Coke


quote:

The difference between a Mexican Coke and its traditional counterpart is visually apparent on the bottle, but it's not just the packaging that distinguishes the two. While they are both made with the classic Coca-Cola formula, there's a vital difference in the ingredients list.

The core recipe of carbonated water, a sweetener, caramel color, caffeine, and the secret natural flavor ingredients is the same in both cases. The sweetener is where the recipes diverge. Traditional Coke is made with high fructose corn syrup. In Mexico, this is swapped out for cane sugar. There also may be a slight difference in the formula, as the Coke secret ingredients are slightly different in other countries, but this difference is rarely disclosed by the company (via Serious Eats).

Many consumers claim that the Mexican version made with real cane sugar is tastier. This is possibly due to a slightly less intense sweetness; some studies claim high fructose corn syrup is up to 1.5 times sweeter than plain old sugar, according to Live Science. Others believe soda sweetened with real cane sugar is more natural, pure, less harsh, and possibly healthier (via New York Times Magazine). Only, Coca-Cola wouldn't agree with those takes. "There is no perceptible taste difference ... Whether sweetened with high fructose corn syrup or sugar, a Coke is a Coke and both are 'the real thing,'" a representative from Coca-Cola told Consumerist. Read More: https://www.mashed.com/200565/the-untold-truth-of-mexican-coke/


High fructose corn syrup comes from fricking with nature/corn

Mexican’s historically revere/worship corn

Avoid ultra processed trash…

The more you know
Posted by olemc999
At a blackjack table
Member since Oct 2010
14527 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:21 pm to
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
46691 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Fructose in fruit is not as bad for you as in candy bars and coke because the fructose in fruit is bound with fiber and harder for your digestive system to access.

Just quit being a friggin pig!
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
125474 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Ethanol


People have drank ethanol for thousands of years

Why did it not start making us fat until now?
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
14595 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 8:37 pm to
Well what’s your educated opinion since you think you are smarter that him you just another frick up that thinks you know better than the pros. Stfu
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
52932 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Eat more and move less.




Quite the opposite
Posted by TCO
Member since Jul 2022
3261 posts
Posted on 12/31/23 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

I drink coke all day long, is it on list?


Trashy
Posted by PGAOLDBawNeVaBroke
Member since Dec 2023
1051 posts
Posted on 1/1/24 at 10:08 am to
Please repeat that in English.
Posted by Rick9Plus
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2020
2224 posts
Posted on 1/1/24 at 11:00 am to
My SO had full blown diabetes though wasn’t overweight. Quit drinking wine and was cured. There’s something to that.
Posted by Sneauxghost
Member since Sep 2020
1199 posts
Posted on 1/1/24 at 1:10 pm to
I disagree. I used these theories last year. Dropped 20lbs and bloodwork came back perfect. BP back to normal. No meds needed. Try it first. It may not work for everyone but it has me running like I’m in my 20s again.
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
8264 posts
Posted on 1/1/24 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

My SO had full blown diabetes though wasn’t overweight. Quit drinking wine and was cured. There’s something to that.



Yea I bet it was just the wine
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram