Started By
Message

re: I want AI to take over all traffic light programming and timing

Posted on 4/17/26 at 11:58 am to
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
24552 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 11:58 am to
quote:

I want AI to take over all traffic light programming and timing


It will.
Ouster has begun implementing Lidar technology in Tennessee, Utah, and a few other locations.


Website



You're welcome

This post was edited on 4/17/26 at 12:06 pm
Posted by Uncle Stu
#AlbinoLivesMatter
Member since Aug 2004
33863 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Do you think it's Mark in the transportation office using a pencil and guessing?

he prefers to go by "Marcus", and dont dismiss the slide rule, a-hole
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49491 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Don't forget the people that sit back a full car length away from the intersection when stopped at a red light, thereby not triggering the camera/sensor to know it needs to cycle the lights so that traffic can clear.

You can tell a lot about human nature by watching their behavior at a traffic light.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
11889 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 1:07 pm to
Slime molds will do anything for oatmeal. Just thought that bit of trivia deserved appreciation.
Posted by magicman534
The dirty dell
Member since May 2011
1865 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 1:27 pm to
Slidell is the worst. I feel like every light here either turns red when cars get close to it or it’s only green for 3 secs. Not surprising for this shithole and the idiots that work for the gubment here.
This post was edited on 4/17/26 at 1:59 pm
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
74680 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Slidell is the worst. I feel like every light in here either turns red when cars get close to it or it’s only green for 3 secs. Not surprising for this shithole and the idiots that work for the gubment here.
What about the yellow lights there?

You’ve made literally no reference to them.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87348 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

change the light when there are no cars on the cross street but a long line backed up waiting for the regular light cycle to change
This has gone on for a while. There's an intersection here where the favored street never has a red light unless a vehicle is detected on the cross street. There's lots of stuff like this going on. Deposing traffic engineers on the light inventory can be quite interesting.
Posted by Spankum
The Sip
Member since Jan 2007
62107 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

What makes proper timing difficult?


I think it would be extremely difficult…

It is not just a matter of timing one light to the next, as that would be simple. I’m sure they have to take overall traffic flow as well as everything from rush hour to the middle of the night.

I agree….AI is ideally suited for things like traffic light timing. However, if it takes everything into consideration, it may not yield the results that you think it will.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84590 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 1:51 pm to
The lights in Baton Rouge are perfectly synchronized. They’re synchronized to force every car to stop at every light, but synchronized nonetheless.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53378 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Do you think it's Mark in the transportation office using a pencil and guessing?


I’m sure a dart board is involved
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
75264 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Don't forget the people that sit back a full car length away from the intersection when stopped at a red light, thereby not triggering the camera/sensor to know it needs to cycle the lights so that traffic can clear.


Or the people who pull ahead of it.
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
3776 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

The people who do it in my area l
those are engineers making those decisions. they may be pretty smart but many lack common sense.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29104 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

I want AI to take over all traffic light programming and timing
I wouldn't say I want it to "take over", but it should absolutely be used as a non-authoritative layer in the system.
quote:

What makes proper timing difficult?

It's difficult because of the sheer quantity and diversity of variables. If you only consider one intersection, you can tune and tweak it, take every variable into account, and get it "perfect" so that average wait times are minimized in all directions at all times.

But then add a second intersection where some of the same traffic interacts with both. Already it is likely impossible to optimize wait times at both intersections simultaneously. The best you can do is balance them to optimize the two-intersection system. And the problem gets harder exponentially as you scale up to hundreds of intersections. Each individual intersection will be pretty far from optimal in order to optimize the system as a whole.

And to truly optimize a whole city, the AI would need navigation data from every vehicle to avoid potential congestion. This might require an entire data center's capacity to keep up with it all if using AI.
This post was edited on 4/17/26 at 2:28 pm
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
24552 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

to truly optimize a whole city, the AI would need navigation data from every vehicle to avoid potential congestion. This might require an entire data center's capacity to keep up with it all if using AI.
Hello Edge AI
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29104 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Hello Edge AI
Yep, even better if each vehicle or driver's phone could interact with the intersection's edge compute directly. But a central controller (or clustered decision-maker) would still be required to coordinate things, otherwise each intersection would compete to optimize itself at the expense of the system as a whole.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
24552 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

But a central controller (or clustered decision-maker) would still be required to coordinate things, otherwise each intersection would compete to optimize itself at the expense of the system as a whole.


This seems to be a decent solution, but you probably know better than me...
The edge computer only sends lightweight METADATA back to the central server. Instead of sending a gigabyte of video, it sends a tiny text packet that essentially says: "Northbound lane has 5 cars, average speed is 35 mph, pedestrian waiting to cross."

Because of EDGE AI, the central city server doesn't need to be a supercomputer. It just acts as a dashboard collecting tiny status updates and coordinating the broader grid.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122047 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

The people who do it in my area likely have drool falling out of their mouths.

What makes proper timing difficult?


I didn't realize the were controlled by a dude in a booth hitting switches. Seriously, I think get synced every so often, but after awhile it gets off the timing.

I think, if you are on a road like Airline, if you hit a red light, once it turns green it was synced so that if you.. Lets say turn on airline from Bluebonnet and going to north to get on the old bridge, you would not hit another red light. but I think it was based on driving a certain speed.. likely the speed limit so if someone goes 15 mph faster they will get to a red light faster and have to wait for it to turn green which then makes it pointless to drive faster.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42213 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Slidell is the worst.


No further explanation or description required.
Posted by SECretariat
Member since Jun 2015
362 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Traffic patterns aren't consistent for starters.


You don't think Waze has this information?! Sign a contract with Google/Gemini.

In Baton Rouge, we don't need a 2 minute stop of Perkins for Quail Drive, especially on the weekends. NO ONE IS THERE. NO ONE IS EVER.THERE. Same for all of downtown baton rouge too.

All lights at least need motion sensors on non dominant lanes
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89070 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

You don't think Waze has this information?!


No, they do not have knowledge of unpredictable future traffic future movements. Would be pretty nifty if they did.

quote:

In Baton Rouge, we don't need a 2 minute stop of Perkins for Quail Drive, especially on the weekends. NO ONE IS THERE. NO ONE IS EVER.THERE. Same for all of downtown baton rouge too.

All lights at least need motion sensors on non dominant lanes


There are sensors all over that intersection

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram