- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I hope nobody is planning to fly through IAH anytime soon
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:41 pm to SallysHuman
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:41 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I never thought or cared to google it. Feel free to link your findings, I will read it.
With all the posts you just made you could have easily typed a few words into a Google search bar lmfao
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:42 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:
With all the posts you just made you could have easily typed a few words into a Google search bar lmfao
That would cut into my posting time.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:42 pm to Centinel
quote:
If by "constituents" you mean illegal aliens, then yes. You are correct they want ICE reigned in.
I know y'all want to pretend like illegal aliens are actually crime lords with supernatural abilities who can vote in high enough numbers to turn an election your way without leaving a trace of evidence but here in the real world no, or, to salve your hurt fee fees, almost no illegal alien votes and is not a constituent. Polling indicates 60% of Americans want ICE reigned in....only in MAGA world does 60% of Americans mean illegal alien....
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:43 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
very easy to do in 2026 if someone wishes to do so...easier than in 16, 06 or 1996.
if you include social media, sure.
otherwise, nope.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:47 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
save your 100 word “this is the how the system works” nonsense for someone else grandpaw.
We both know this is not about “reigning ICE in”, ICE is doing their job. who benefits from this? (before I start dropping clips of your representatives saying the quiet part out loud)
My friend I don't give a frick how many clips you drop, the fact remains that there is no law which requires the opposition party to rubber stamp the party in power's agenda in the United States. Makes NO difference what an individual says, no matter how vile and hateful, the fact remains that nothing can legally compel Democrats to support action which their constituents do not support. The GOP has an option, they won't use it because when it blows up in their face they won't be able to claim bi-partisan support.
Mitch McConnel blocked Barack Obama's supreme court nomination and was cussed by democrats and lauded by republicans...he was doing what his constituents wanted. The same as democrats today. It is how our system works.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:51 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
if you include social media, sure.
otherwise, nope.
By all accounts church attendance is on the rise in the last year or so...it was on the decline through 2020 or so....there is no better place than church to be a part of a community....if one chooses not to attend its a personal choice, not a societal one.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:53 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
The Supreme Court has ruled that the counting of illegal immigrants in the census for congressional apportionment is permissible, meaning that both citizens and non-citizens are included in the population count used to determine representation.
quote:
If illegal immigrants were not counted for congressional apportionment, states like California, Florida, and Texas could lose congressional seats, while states like Alabama, Minnesota, and Ohio might retain seats they would otherwise lose. Overall, this could shift political power and representation, potentially benefiting Republican-leaning states over Democratic-leaning ones.
But yeah, nothing to see here, along with the billions they use in school services, hospital visits they don't pay for, SNAP, CHIP, etc. Illegals need to GTFO, period.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 1:06 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
I know y'all want to pretend like illegal aliens are actually crime lords with supernatural abilities who can vote in high enough numbers to turn an election your way without leaving a trace of evidence but here in the real world no, or, to salve your hurt fee fees, almost no illegal alien votes and is not a constituent.
Well, then the left has nothing to worry about with regard to more scrutiny surrounding voting?
It should turn up nothing and have very little to no effect.
We all know this is bullshite.
An estimated 4% of the US population is illegal - 13 to 14 million people.
That’s a staggering, unsustainable number on a multitude of fronts in the welfare state the left is fond of cultivating.
It’s suicidal.
This post was edited on 3/25/26 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 3/25/26 at 1:15 pm to rickgrimes
Democrats in action. Oh sorry thought this was the poli board. Let me rephrase that.
This is the result of dependence on the government and refusal to privatize.
This is the result of dependence on the government and refusal to privatize.
This post was edited on 3/25/26 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 3/25/26 at 1:25 pm to rickgrimes
Stop paying Congress and refuse to fly them out of DC and this would be fixed pretty quickly.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 1:28 pm to rickgrimes
I am in September. Shirley this shite is cleared up by then and yes I called you Shirley.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 1:49 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
My friend I don't give a frick how many clips you drop, the fact remains that there is no law which requires the opposition party to rubber stamp the party in power's agenda in the United States. Makes NO difference what an individual says, no matter how vile and hateful, the fact remains that nothing can legally compel Democrats to support action which their constituents do not support. The GOP has an option, they won't use it because when it blows up in their face they won't be able to claim bi-partisan support. Mitch McConnel blocked Barack Obama's supreme court nomination and was cussed by democrats and lauded by republicans...he was doing what his constituents wanted. The same as democrats today. It is how our system work
another 200 word civics lesson, no one asked for, to still avoid the underlying question: who is this dog and pony going to benefit? answer it
Posted on 3/25/26 at 1:50 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
By all accounts church attendance is on the rise in the last year or so...it was on the decline through 2020 or so....there is no better place than church to be a part of a community....if one chooses not to attend its a personal choice, not a societal one.
church attendance compared to what year in history? you’re terrible at this.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 1:59 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
quote:
The Supreme Court has ruled that the counting of illegal immigrants in the census for congressional apportionment is permissible, meaning that both citizens and non-citizens are included in the population count used to determine representation.
quote:
If illegal immigrants were not counted for congressional apportionment, states like California, Florida, and Texas could lose congressional seats, while states like Alabama, Minnesota, and Ohio might retain seats they would otherwise lose. Overall, this could shift political power and representation, potentially benefiting Republican-leaning states over Democratic-leaning ones.
But yeah, nothing to see here, along with the billions they use in school services, hospital visits they don't pay for, SNAP, CHIP, etc. Illegals need to GTFO, period.
So a supreme court decision is no longer nothing to see here...got it.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 2:11 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:
I know y'all want to pretend like illegal aliens are actually crime lords with supernatural abilities who can vote in high enough numbers to turn an election your way without leaving a trace of evidence but here in the real world no, or, to salve your hurt fee fees, almost no illegal alien votes and is not a constituent. Polling indicates 60% of Americans want ICE reigned in....only in MAGA world does 60% of Americans mean illegal alien....
I’m almost positive it’s very transparent to the vast majority of posters reading, but here’s what you’re really doing with this post:
> Downplaying the problem
> Mocking anyone who’s concerned about it
> Hiding behind selectively interpreted polling
> Declaring victory
That might work on Reddit, but not here. Even if anyone were take that load of shite at face value (which is generous), you conveniently skip the part where the same polling consistently shows a majority of Americans support deportation. And it was the top reason people elected this administration in the last election.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 2:13 pm to rickgrimes
I was there yesterday. It wasn't that bad.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 2:24 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
church attendance compared to what year in history? you’re terrible at this.
Compared to the years in question....in 1996, 2006 and 2016 it was declining, in 2026 it is increasing. Life is better by any quantifiable metric in 2026 than any year in history and will be better next year. I know that its comforting to pretend otherwise for most people but it is simply fact....by any quantifiable measure life is better today than yesterday for the majority of people on the planet.
US Life Expectancy
1996 76.1 Years
2006 77.1 years
2016 78.6 Years
2026 79 years
Life is good, is better than it was and not as good as it will be.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 2:27 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
> Downplaying the problem
> Mocking anyone who’s concerned about it
> Hiding behind selectively interpreted polling
> Declaring victory
That might work on Reddit, but not here.
You must be new to TigerDroppings to think that doesn't work on here. Just depends on what letter is behind the politicians name
Posted on 3/25/26 at 2:36 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
another 200 word civics lesson, no one asked for, to still avoid the underlying question: [b]who is this dog and pony going to benefit[/b]? answer it
My friend no one has asked for a single post to these message boards.
I do not know how the bold and underlined part of your response is pertinent but a dog or a pony could possibly benefit anyone who needed a dog or a pony for whatever reason. Both have proven to be of great benefit to mankind over the history of our species. Dogs provide companionship, protection and can be of great assistance in hunting and even beasts of burden. Ponies are also highly beneficial to anyone who needs one. Like their larger kin, horses, they provide transportation and can haul a load. It is my understanding that some folks enjoy ponies simply because they are ponies. Combined dogs and ponies can be used together to hunt, carry loads, entertainment - there are ample examples of dogs and ponies performing together to entertain crowds. I don't know why you asked who this dog and pony would benefit, it seems to be a question you pulled out of nowhere for god knows what purpose....
Posted on 3/25/26 at 2:36 pm to AwgustaDawg
quote:some of what you are saying is true, but as noted, you are completely ignoring the census aspect. Nothing else can explain the level of intense "pro-illegal" policy supported by one side other than this.
I know y'all want to pretend like illegal aliens are actually crime lords with supernatural abilities who can vote in high enough numbers to turn an election your way without leaving a trace of evidence but here in the real world no, or, to salve your hurt fee fees, almost no illegal alien votes and is not a constituent. Polling indicates 60% of Americans want ICE reigned in....only in MAGA world does 60% of Americans mean illegal alien....
Popular
Back to top



1






