- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How long before they find the cure for cancer?
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:58 pm to Ronaldo Burgundiaz
Posted on 10/24/18 at 2:58 pm to Ronaldo Burgundiaz
quote:
As someone that works in a lab.....,
Then you are a piece of shite human being that has a special place in Hell awaiting you. You sick fricker.
0
Posted on 10/24/18 at 3:12 pm to IIxxBREADxxII
quote:
It probably already exist but they will never let it made available to the public.
Way too much money to lose from the "treatment "
If you're one of these people, please remove yourself from the gene pool.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 3:13 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
Posted by uptowntiger84 on 10/24/18 at 2:51 pm
They already have one. But why cure something when they can bleed you dry with all the medicines to keep you alive but never cure it?
quote:
Posted by TigerMyth36 online on 10/24/18 at 2:55 pm
They don't want a cure. They want a long term treatment. Come on into the deep state rabbit hole.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 3:14 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
If you think pharmaceutical companies and/or your drug dealing Doctor will allow that to happen good luck.
Yeah, because a company doesn't stand to profit from curing cancer
The stupidity behind that conspiracy theory is almost to the point of being admirable.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 3:17 pm to al_cajun
Could have happened already, but the ones that cured it all died unfortunately to abortion.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 3:23 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
People that believe this are some of the stupidest on the planet
I agree with this.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 3:49 pm to eddieray
And I can just imagine the back and forth went at whatever company allegedly has the cure.
Bob, I've got some bad news for you. You know how we've invested a couple billion dollars and the last dozen or so years to develop this drug?
Yea, it's exceedingly expensive to bring a new drug to market. And it's cost us even more to pay to keep all our phase 1 and phase 2 trials results under lock and key so the public has no idea what's going on, because that's what we do when we think we have a product that will cure an incredibly common and particularly devastating disease. It's what our investors want and expect. What's the bad news?
Are you sitting down Bob? It's really bad, you should sit down.
Yup.
Well, it actually cures cancer. Yeah, almost 1/3 of the country will get cancer and this thing can cure it.
Are you fricking with me? fricking frick. This is a disaster. How the hell are we supposed to make any money of this piece of shite?!
Yeah, I told you it was bad. We need to get our heads together and see if there's a way to adapt it so that it only "almost" cures cancer. But that will take another billion or so dollars and a bunch of years to fix it. Our careers are over Bob.
Remember when we got drunk with those guys from AstraZeneca and they told us that they had the cure as well a while back? It cost them a fortune to keep that thing under wraps and tone it down so it only helped with cancer. The board fricking cleaned house over there because of it.
I have no idea how this could have happened. We're fricked.
Bob, I've got some bad news for you. You know how we've invested a couple billion dollars and the last dozen or so years to develop this drug?
Yea, it's exceedingly expensive to bring a new drug to market. And it's cost us even more to pay to keep all our phase 1 and phase 2 trials results under lock and key so the public has no idea what's going on, because that's what we do when we think we have a product that will cure an incredibly common and particularly devastating disease. It's what our investors want and expect. What's the bad news?
Are you sitting down Bob? It's really bad, you should sit down.
Yup.
Well, it actually cures cancer. Yeah, almost 1/3 of the country will get cancer and this thing can cure it.
Are you fricking with me? fricking frick. This is a disaster. How the hell are we supposed to make any money of this piece of shite?!
Yeah, I told you it was bad. We need to get our heads together and see if there's a way to adapt it so that it only "almost" cures cancer. But that will take another billion or so dollars and a bunch of years to fix it. Our careers are over Bob.
Remember when we got drunk with those guys from AstraZeneca and they told us that they had the cure as well a while back? It cost them a fortune to keep that thing under wraps and tone it down so it only helped with cancer. The board fricking cleaned house over there because of it.
I have no idea how this could have happened. We're fricked.
This post was edited on 10/24/18 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:02 pm to al_cajun
The obligatory 350.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:14 pm to al_cajun
Cant just cure cancer, it ranges so many diff things. Some are def easier to get rid of with surgery or chemo.
Dad had prostate cancer, no longer has it. My best friends mom had breast cancer, no longer has it.
And there is no conspiracy. All it would take is one person's family member to get cancer. Sorry Bob, we cant cure your mom because we need to make money. Someone would bust that wide open.
Dad had prostate cancer, no longer has it. My best friends mom had breast cancer, no longer has it.
And there is no conspiracy. All it would take is one person's family member to get cancer. Sorry Bob, we cant cure your mom because we need to make money. Someone would bust that wide open.
This post was edited on 10/24/18 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:24 pm to dgnx6
quote:
ant cure your mom because we need to make money.
But here's the thing. That ridiculous conspiracy theory is false. Lots of therapies that can help in cancer make a ton of money. A magic pill that would cure it would be a windfall the likes of which we've never seen on earth.
I tried to joke about it in my hypothetical back and forth above, but probably didn't lay it on thick enough for some people in this thread.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:29 pm to al_cajun
A shite load of $$$$$ to not cure cancer.
Hospitals have spent hundreds of millions on cancer centers, equipment, doctors, etc.
If one group found a cure, it would cost Hospitals who went all in on cancer, a lot of $$$$
Hospitals have spent hundreds of millions on cancer centers, equipment, doctors, etc.
If one group found a cure, it would cost Hospitals who went all in on cancer, a lot of $$$$
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:35 pm to SeeeeK
quote:
If one group found a cure, it would cost Hospitals who went all in on cancer, a lot of $$$$
So all the other diseases that were so prevalent and debilitating and made everyone so much money, like you talk about, were ok to be cured because????
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:39 pm to Hopeful Doc
What is scary is that these morons in this thread who think there is some super secret cancer cure somewhere that is being hidden on purpose...they are reproducing. They are in charge of raising another living thing in this world.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:40 pm to al_cajun
Go watch it on Netflix. It explains well the greed of Big Pharma and its influence on FDA, there is no money in curing cancer.
quote:
Ph.D biochemist, Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, won one of the largest legal battles against the Food & Drug Administration in U.S. history. Dr. Burzynski and his patients endured a treacherous 14-year journey in order to obtain FDA-approved clinical trials for a new cancer-fighting drug. His groundbreaking medical and legal battles have brought revolutionary cancer treatment to the public. Upon completion, his treatment will be available the world over - sending a shock wave through the cancer industry.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:48 pm to lake chuck fan
Whether the good Doc has a cure is open to debate.
But you are not well informed and watching a movie and thinking you know something is terrible.
But you are not well informed and watching a movie and thinking you know something is terrible.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:57 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
If you think pharmaceutical companies and/or your drug dealing Doctor will allow that to happen good luck.
Yeah, the pharmaceutical company that sold a cancer cure or vaccine would probably go bankrupt soon after, right?
Y'all act like every human currently alive AND EVERYONE BORN IN THE FUTURE would just get it for free. The company that finds the vaccine would have a literal never ending supply of people to put their medicine in. You don't think they would give it away for free do you?
Posted on 10/24/18 at 5:04 pm to PotatoChip
quote:
The billionaire data was group research from a paper we did while still in school.
Was this published or peer-reviewed?
quote:
It was roughly 530 billionaires at the time with less than 20 diagnoses with “known cancers”. It is possible that some had cancer and chose to keep it secret, but there is little hidden from the public when it comes to the super rich.
I don't think that public record on 530 people is enough to say that 20/530 had cancer. Without having access to everything icd9/10 code ever put on all 530 of their charts, I'd say you have an insufficient amount of data to convince me of the prevalence. You definitely have nothing to convince me of annual incidence, and the sample size is too small to draw any meaningful conclusions.
Now, the question of "is there something about being rich that makes you less likely to have cancer?" Is also unanswerable due to looking at 500 rich people vs 7,000,000,000 nonbillionaires. But we definitely know that lifestyle influences certain types of cancers. being a nun correlated with a low rate of cervical cancer but a high rate of breast cancer
There are links (and I also can link if you'd like) between processed red meat and colon cancer, smoking and lung/renal cancer. Lifestyle definitely has some influence on some cancers. So it's distinctly possible that the super rich guy that doesn't roughneck in the subtropics, smoke, and make his own sausage had a lower cancer rate. Without data to support it, I would bet their access to healthcare professionals is above that of nonbillionaires over the last 50 years which also leads to standard screening and prevention.
But I don't think your quoted stat represents reality and has a whole lot of room for error.
Posted on 10/24/18 at 5:06 pm to Hopeful Doc
cure cancer? How would you be able to go on the cancer pill kickback cruise every year?
Posted on 10/24/18 at 5:12 pm to FightnBobLafollette
quote:
Whether the good Doc has a cure is open to debate.
But you are not well informed and watching a movie and thinking you know something is terrible.
LoL…. But we should believe you, just another faceless opinion on a message board???? Your probably sitting on your kids high chair so you can look down on all of us ill informed!!! Lmao! fricktard
Posted on 10/24/18 at 5:21 pm to lake chuck fan
I didn’t ask you to believe anything. Well, anything other than the fact that you are uninformed. Which you clearly are.
I doubt you know that the good doc uses chemo drugs along with his therapy.
Feel free to link the good doc’s published work on his studies.
Feel free to link to other researchers who have been able to replicate his results.
After you are done, could you hook me up with some Laetrile?
I doubt you know that the good doc uses chemo drugs along with his therapy.
Feel free to link the good doc’s published work on his studies.
Feel free to link to other researchers who have been able to replicate his results.
After you are done, could you hook me up with some Laetrile?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News