- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: how Harvard’s composition would change if admission based solely on being top decile
Posted on 10/18/18 at 11:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 10/18/18 at 11:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:While I believe the premise is true, it’s extemely questionable to create an index using far more objective, quantifiable, and relevant standardized tests and combine it with “high school performance.”
how Harvard’s composition would change if admission based solely on being top decile
Why wouldn’t he/she use the tests, since they very likely would provide a better analysis, they are easier to understand and interpret?
Maybe it’s data both sides of the case are using, but unless they are stuck with it, experts should use their expertise, and use the best data available.
This post was edited on 10/18/18 at 11:06 pm
Posted on 10/18/18 at 11:05 pm to volod
These guys don’t seem to realize that there is far more involved getting into than grades.
Who is a better Harvard candidate:
4.0 GPA
1600 SAT
mathlete
3.8
1500
Varsity athlete
Editor school paper
Who is a better Harvard candidate:
4.0 GPA
1600 SAT
mathlete
3.8
1500
Varsity athlete
Editor school paper
Posted on 10/18/18 at 11:07 pm to volod
quote:
A private business can discriminate between applicants if they feel one person would fit in better than the other.
Not on racial grounds.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 11:10 pm to FightnBobLafollette
quote:Probably B, based in the extra extra-curricular.
Who is a better Harvard candidate:
But then again, he/she may have attended some small school where being a varsity athlete is a bit easier for someone.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 11:10 pm to FightnBobLafollette
quote:
Still haven’t presented a logical argument.
It’s obvious I don’t favor racial discrimination, and it’s equally obvious that you do, as long as it benefits non-whites. You’re a typical racist liberal.
Posted on 10/18/18 at 11:28 pm to volod
quote:
Not necessarily. Think of it this way. There are plenty of 4.0 + perfect SAT scores people who have little social skills. It's a cliche and doesn't apply to everybody but its VERY TRUE.
Schools do have a right to want different types of students in their class.
Ok. But why is race a factor?
quote:
But honestly it doesn't matter because you and others wont be content until its 100% white or Asian. And most likely, that's never going to happen.
It’s racist liberals like yourself who support racial discrimination. You won’t admit it, of course.
Posted on 10/19/18 at 6:09 am to FightnBobLafollette
quote:
Who is a better Harvard candidate:
4.0 GPA
1600 SAT
mathlete
3.8
1500
Varsity athlete
Editor school paper
Tell that to Michael Wang who had 4.67 GPA, 99th percentile SAT, percent ACT, speech club, debate club, math club(founder), plays piano, sang at obama’s inauguration.
He was rejected by not only Harvard but other ivy schools as well.
Posted on 10/19/18 at 6:10 am to DeltaDoc
I remember seeing that his IQ was 137
Posted on 10/19/18 at 8:04 am to CoachMoorGut
quote:
Old photo of a 94%er.
LOL, what’s worse, that or daddy buying you in to the shitty Ivy of all schools like our current President?
How many Presidents likely earned admission? LBJ at Texas State? Probably HW Bush. Anybody else?
This post was edited on 10/19/18 at 8:04 am
Posted on 10/19/18 at 12:46 pm to PeteRose
quote:
Tell that to Michael Wang who had 4.67 GPA, 99th percentile SAT, percent ACT, speech club, debate club, math club(founder), plays piano, sang at obama’s inauguration. He was rejected by not only Harvard but other ivy schools as well.
The fact that the bottom decile of those admitted to Harvard as shown in in the OPs graphic is made up of people that have grades and test scores above the 99th percentile of all students is not understood by most of the posters here.
Posted on 10/19/18 at 12:49 pm to FightnBobLafollette
quote:
These guys don’t seem to realize that there is far more involved getting into than grades.
Who is a better Harvard candidate:
4.0 GPA 1600 SAT mathlete
3.8 1500 Varsity athlete Editor school paper
4.0 GPA 1600 SAT mathlete has only a 8% chance of gaining admission,
3.8 1500 Varsity athlete Editor school paper has a zero chance of being admitted.
Posted on 10/19/18 at 12:52 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
LOL, what’s worse, that or daddy buying you in to the shitty Ivy of all schools like our current President?
How many Presidents likely earned admission? LBJ at Texas State? Probably HW Bush. Anybody else?
You're stupid. Penn is hardly a shitty school. Where did you go? Let me guess nowhere
Oh, and pretty sure Clinton earned his way into college.
Posted on 10/19/18 at 1:15 pm to Rouge
quote:
So you're saying that whites and Asians are held to a higher standard because of their ethnic background?
I would guess blacks and hispanics are held to a lower standard. PoTAYto, poTAHto...
Posted on 10/19/18 at 1:54 pm to EA6B
quote:
Everyone of those admitted regardless of race had a SAT score at the 99th percentile or greater. A perfect score of 1600 on the SAT equates to only a 8% chance of being admitted to Harvard.
Did you even read the link you posted? It says a 1600 ACT yields a chance of admission GREATER THAN 8%.
Further, if you had clicked through to their data source, you would see that 25% of the admitted students scored BELOW 1460 on the SAT. That certainly is not 99th percentile.
Posted on 10/19/18 at 2:03 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
.
This post was edited on 8/23/19 at 7:19 am
Posted on 10/19/18 at 3:22 pm to birdieman
quote:
My wife is high level at a big private school in Pa.... She told me that Chinese students cheat on tests and most of their scores aren't real.
Cheating is endemic.
You can’t trust the scores coming out of China.
Posted on 10/19/18 at 3:26 pm to EA6B
quote:
The fact that the bottom decile of those admitted to Harvard as shown in in the OPs graphic is made up of people that have grades and test scores above the 99th percentile of all students is not understood by most of the posters here.
Is that what the OP's graphic shows?
Posted on 10/19/18 at 3:30 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
How many Presidents likely earned admission? LBJ at Texas State? Probably HW Bush. Anybody else?
At that time, the ivies were effectively finishing schools for the New England aristocracy. If you went to Andover, you were going on to Yale, and that was true even if you were getting gentleman’s Cs.
In 1948, 100% of my alma maters graduating class matriculated to Harvard.
Andover and Yale were also brutalty difficult in that era though, and so even if admission may have been easier for HW, he was undoubtedly well educated.
With the democratization of higher education, standards have dropped a lot.
Posted on 10/19/18 at 3:42 pm to Centinel
quote:
That second infographic is basically saying black kids are stupid and incapable of learning the material the white kids learn.
The infographic isn't saying that, every single collection of data ever done on the topic is saying that.
Popular
Back to top


0





