- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
history question for the OT: what was so bad about Rhodesia?
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:41 am
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:41 am
What was the difference between it and any other English colony? I know that the locals who took it back over were really nasty to the whites and killed most of them after they won in the 20th century
23
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:43 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Their dogs eat lions!
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:43 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Nothing was bad about it. It was a prime example of what a country on the African continent could be. Leftists didn’t like that though so they destroyed it and turned it into a third-world shithole.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:44 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
First, they did not kill most of the whites. Far from it. Second you have a white minority that denied blacks their voting rights. I mean you cannot have a country especially a former African Colony be a county with white minority rule.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:46 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
We need a white supremacy board for threads like this.
Rhodesia was actually a white supremacist regime, as a primary feature of its law.
Rhodesia was actually a white supremacist regime, as a primary feature of its law.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:47 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Great book detailing the downfall.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:49 am to Aubie Spr96
The entire continent will be a Chinese territory soon, anyway.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:49 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
The breadbasket of Africa. Richest country in the continent with the highest standard of living. That is the answer to your question.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:50 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Rhodesia was a shining jewel in Africa. It was a thriving country, called the breadbasket of Africa. Their farming was world renowned.
The people were fierce and brave. Then the commies came in and stirred up part of the population with falsehoods and empty promises, demonizing the Rhodesians.
The world abandoned them, but they held out, as long as they could. But with communist and globalist backing, the fall was inevitable and the horrors visited thereafter make me shudder.
Some memes to help
The people were fierce and brave. Then the commies came in and stirred up part of the population with falsehoods and empty promises, demonizing the Rhodesians.
The world abandoned them, but they held out, as long as they could. But with communist and globalist backing, the fall was inevitable and the horrors visited thereafter make me shudder.
Some memes to help
This post was edited on 4/11/23 at 11:11 am
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:51 am to Darth_Vader
Ah. Did the soviets help overthrow it?
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:54 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Nothing was bad about it. It was a prime example of what a country on the African continent could be. Leftists didn’t like that though so they destroyed it and turned it into a third-world shithole.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 10:59 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
The wrong people were in charge.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:02 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:Why not? It went to shite when you retards made it fair.
I mean you cannot have a country especially a former African Colony be a county with white minority rule.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:04 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
The breadbasket of Africa... when white people were in charge. Now it's nothing.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:07 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Was it an apartheid regime that made South Africa look progressive by comparison? Yes.
Did Mugabe and his crew run it into the ground after they took over? Also yes.
Cecil Rhodes got crossways with the Boers in South Africa so he basically decided to go out and start his own country.
Did Mugabe and his crew run it into the ground after they took over? Also yes.
Cecil Rhodes got crossways with the Boers in South Africa so he basically decided to go out and start his own country.
This post was edited on 4/11/23 at 11:10 am
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:07 am to fr33manator
quote:
demonizing the boers…
The vast majority of white people in Rhodesia were of English descent. There were many Rhodesians of Dutch descent, but all white Rhodesians were not “boers”.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:08 am to fr33manator
quote:
demonizing the boers.
English colony
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:10 am to beachdude
quote:
The vast majority of white people in Rhodesia were of English descent. There were many Rhodesians of Dutch descent, but all white Rhodesians were not “boers”.
Fair point. They were Rhodesians. I'll edit.
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:11 am to TBoy
quote:
Rhodesia was actually a white supremacist regime
yep, with a robust economy before the international sanctions
now its just another black supremacist shithole...
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:11 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
Page 1 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News