Started By
Message

re: history question for the OT: what was so bad about Rhodesia?

Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:48 am to
Posted by rhar61
Member since Nov 2022
5109 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:48 am to
quote:

there is absolutely zero chance you didn't have a shite eating trolling smirk across your face when you typed this out




just like you dumb shits to virtue signal, "fix" something, and then have many more people dead because of your "fix"

Slap yourself on the back again.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98265 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:52 am to
Found this questin/answer on Quora pretty enlightening

quote:

Related
What do Black Zimbabweans think about Rhodesia?

Most of us were born after independence in 1980 and we are mostly indifferent. Rhodesia existed 40 years ago and our population is mostly young people with a median age of just 18.7. Due to the economic catastrophe of 40 years of Zanu PF rule we all stop and think sometimes but it generally ends there. I will give you 5 perspectives that I believe cover most black Zimbabweans.

The Black Elite - I grew up in these circles. The older generation absolutely despise Rhodesia because of the opportunities that they missed in that era. They have no kind words for Rhodesia and will often have a frosty relationship with Zimbabwean whites. A lot of people in this group took up arms against Rhodesians in the liberation struggle. I was born into the younger generation of the elites although my father was no longer so wealthy by the time I was born. In the younger generation, our opinions are formed forcefully by the older generation. I went to one of the best private schools in Zimbabwe were the white Zimbabweans formerly Rhodesians sent their kids and even though the atmosphere was fairly cordial 75% of the time both sides were firmly entrenched. The black kids hated Rhodesia and the white kids thought Zimbabwe was a failure. There were only about 3 people in the middle in my entire year.

The War Vets - By far the loudest and most vocal group. The Rhodesian army was one of the best in the world and the Selous Scouts were absolutely devastating on the battlefield. The Rhodesians never really lost a battle in the war and they killed the Zanu and Zapu forces by the thousands. The war vets never forgot and they never forgave and their hatred of whites is unyielding to this day. This is the group that actually initiated the farm invasions. They are the loudest on state media but they don’t hold too much sway with the common man anymore.

The average joe - Rhodesia who? Its the economy stupid!! In the daily struggle to survive this group couldn’t care less.

Older rural folk/farmworkers/domestic workers -this group comprises of people who worked closely with the whites in the Rhodesian era and in Zimbabwe. They were considered sellouts due to their Rhodesian sympathies and 20 years ago were the butt of every joke but they have become more vocal in the current economic disasters. These people are very nice to be around but their self-worth and level of progression in life leaves a lot to be desired. This group is sadly dying out.

The minorities - there are some people in the smaller tribes who believe that Zimbabwean Independence was the worst thing ever as it just changed the colour of the colonial master. They do have genuine grievances namely genocide and marginalisation but their extreme approach gives them little support. They prefer Rhodesia but only to spite the current government. (Please note for this group I am only referring to the extreme end)
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16079 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Yes, of course. Same in South Africa.
then why the frick didn’t the us and Britain help Rhodesia and South Africa out against the commies? It also makes no sense as to why we let the chicoms take over all of Africa currently
Posted by OldmanBeasley
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2014
9717 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:54 am to
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53085 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 11:55 am to
America is basically reverse Rhodesia now
Posted by TigersnJeeps
FL Panhandle
Member since Jan 2021
1696 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:02 pm to
"Be a man among men, Rhodesian Light Infantry"
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49671 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Great book detailing the downfall.


I read that after a recommendation here. Was pretty interesting.
Posted by tigahbruh
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2014
2858 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:25 pm to
You can look up up interesting takes from recent African immigrants to the US and UK on youtube and elsewhere.
The consensus among them is that the reason African countries fail so badly is due to culture.
What we consider corruption, bribes, and nepotism they consider normal, expected, and required.
One guy described how he was able to open his own business but it quickly failed due to social pressure to give all of his family and friends free shite and the local government gave him a hard time unless palms were greased and favors promised. That's when he decided to emigrate to a Western country.
In Africa, everywhere is like New Orleans, basically. Except in N.O, there are still "powerful" white people pulling strings behind the scenes. They prove it isnt a racial thing because they are just as incompetent, corrupt, and arrogant as the failed African leaders.

Is it wrong for a foreign power to maintain a small, centralized group controlling an indigineous population that does not want them there? Absolutely.

Is it also accurate to say that, based on centuries of specific cultural evolution, the British and Dutch are far better at creating a productive, successful society? Also true.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64685 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Of course, you aren't interested in the 'why' here, as Zimbabwe was relatively stable until the Second Congo War, which was part of the reason for land expropriation that started in 2000. After the coup in 2017, Zimbabwe's GDP again doubled, leading it to being middle of the pack in Africa (18th in nominal GDP) and around 100 in the world.


Zimbabwe’s 2022 per capita GDP sits at 175th in the world.

LINK

And they rank 178th in the world when it comes to life expectancy.
LINK

Face it, it’s a third world shithole. It wasn’t always a third world shithole. But it is now. You can try to make excuses as to “why”. But the fact stands that it was a prosperous country that became a third world shithole.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
31982 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:39 pm to
We say Zimbabwe now don’t we?
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Zimbabwe’s 2022 per capita GDP sits at 175th in the world.



You dumb shite, I said nominal. In your own link, their nominal GDP is 104. God you are retarded.

quote:

And they rank 178th in the world when it comes to life expectancy.



Cool.

quote:

Face it, it’s a third world shithole. It wasn’t always a third world shithole. But it is now. You can try to make excuses as to “why”. But the fact stands that it was a prosperous country that became a third world shithole.



You dumb frick, the GDP of Rhodesia was like 600 dollars per capita. It's economy was the size of Zambia's, and I'm skeptical you would state that Zambia was some paragon of development. Rhodesia wasn't a stable country, considering it had to deal with an insurgency literally right after declaring independence from the British, as well as sanctions from the British. You are swallowing some big fat propaganda dick because you want to, and you aren't thinking through the larger context, because you likely don't know. Also, in American English, periods go inside the quotations.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16079 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:44 pm to
He blames it on the 2nd Congo war. I wonder if the country would’ve been affected as badly by the war if it was fought by the Rhodesian light infantry other than the Zimbabwean forces
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423138 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Is it wrong for a foreign power to maintain a small, centralized group controlling an indigineous population that does not want them there? Absolutely.

Is it also accurate to say that, based on centuries of specific cultural evolution, the British and Dutch are far better at creating a productive, successful society? Also true.

This is the summary in effectively 2 sentences.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

He blames it on the 2nd Congo war. I wonder if the country would’ve been affected as badly by the war if it was fought by the Rhodesian light infantry other than the Zimbabwean forces



Holy shite. The Second Congo War was massive, you dumb frick. The context of why I said the Second Congo War directly relates to Western donors denying Mugabe foreign capital reserves, which was needed to fight the war. The land expropriation post-2000 was led by war veterans, ZNLWVA, you muppet.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:53 pm to
Everything okay bud?
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124453 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Is it wrong for a foreign power to maintain a small, centralized group controlling an indigineous population that does not want them there? Absolutely.


Is it also accurate to say that, based on centuries of specific cultural evolution, the British and Dutch are far better at creating a productive, successful society? Also true.


This is the summary in effectively 2 sentences.




So...the question is, would you rather be "wrong" and have a successful, prosperous, relatively safe and stable country?


Or "right" (as defined by...who knows) and live in a corrupt, violent, shithole with rampant hyperinflation, starvation, rape gangs, etc. they just replaced a white government with a black dictator who made life demonstrably worse for everyone except his tribe.


Tale as old as time
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68838 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

We need a white supremacy board for threads like this.

Rhodesia was actually a white supremacist regime, as a primary feature of its law.





Ahh the village idiot. Its way more of a black supremacist regime than it ever was a white one. And the country is complete shite now. So yay!

Posted by Tusksup
Sheridan, AR
Member since Feb 2023
1520 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

First, they did not kill most of the whites. Far from it. Second you have a white minority that denied blacks their voting rights. I mean you cannot have a country especially a former African Colony be a county with white minority rule.


Ergo, africa is a shithole and will remain so
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72604 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

crazy4lsu


I've never really read much of your postings... Are you always wound this tight?

You may want to step away for a minute or a month.
Posted by bad93ex
Member since Sep 2018
27306 posts
Posted on 4/11/23 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

crazy4lsu


Which country would you prefer to visit if possible:

Current day Zimbabwe or Rhodesia

Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram