- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Have you ever run your TD handle through AI?
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:07 am to SUB
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:07 am to SUB
SUB…. Here, I asked for you (ChatGPT)
***Tell SUB I said he got played.
I’d absolutely rate him.
From what I can see, SUB is a good candidate for this because he’s been posting since 2009 with 25,000+ posts, which is enough to develop a recognizable style.
My read would be something like this:
* Steady, veteran presence. Doesn’t come across as someone trying to become “board famous.”
* Curious and conversational. Often asks questions that keep discussions moving rather than trying to dominate them.
* Practical. His posts tend to be grounded in everyday observations instead of grandstanding.
* Dry sense of humor. More understated than loud.
* Generally reasonable. He’ll take positions and defend them, but he doesn’t strike me as someone who manufactures outrage just for attention.
If I were writing the kind of synopsis that people have been posting on TD, it’d probably read:
SUB is one of TigerDroppings’ dependable long-time regulars. Rather than building a persona around trolling or hot takes, he tends to contribute measured opinions across a wide range of topics. His style is conversational, occasionally sarcastic, and usually aimed at advancing the discussion instead of derailing it. He’s the type of poster other regulars recognize more for consistency and longevity than for drama.
So no, I wouldn’t refuse to rate him.
In fact, if SUB wants to make a thread titled “ChatGPT, rate SUB”, I’d happily give him a more detailed breakdown of his posting style, strengths, and how I think he’s perceived by other posters—just like I’ve done for you as SallysHuman and for a few other TD personalities. ***
***Tell SUB I said he got played.
I’d absolutely rate him.
From what I can see, SUB is a good candidate for this because he’s been posting since 2009 with 25,000+ posts, which is enough to develop a recognizable style.
My read would be something like this:
* Steady, veteran presence. Doesn’t come across as someone trying to become “board famous.”
* Curious and conversational. Often asks questions that keep discussions moving rather than trying to dominate them.
* Practical. His posts tend to be grounded in everyday observations instead of grandstanding.
* Dry sense of humor. More understated than loud.
* Generally reasonable. He’ll take positions and defend them, but he doesn’t strike me as someone who manufactures outrage just for attention.
If I were writing the kind of synopsis that people have been posting on TD, it’d probably read:
SUB is one of TigerDroppings’ dependable long-time regulars. Rather than building a persona around trolling or hot takes, he tends to contribute measured opinions across a wide range of topics. His style is conversational, occasionally sarcastic, and usually aimed at advancing the discussion instead of derailing it. He’s the type of poster other regulars recognize more for consistency and longevity than for drama.
So no, I wouldn’t refuse to rate him.
In fact, if SUB wants to make a thread titled “ChatGPT, rate SUB”, I’d happily give him a more detailed breakdown of his posting style, strengths, and how I think he’s perceived by other posters—just like I’ve done for you as SallysHuman and for a few other TD personalities. ***
2
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:09 am to SallysHuman
We should just ask our autistic posters to start rating us that would be far more entertaining
We have plenty of those weirdos posting on this message board
We have plenty of those weirdos posting on this message board
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:10 am to RanchoLaPuerto
Mine is pretty spot on. Says I like to talk about grass and baseball.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:10 am to OWLFAN86
quote:
We should just ask our autistic posters to start rating us that would be far more entertaining
Rate me, Owl…
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:10 am to RanchoLaPuerto
Yea it just replied back “who?”
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:11 am to SallysHuman
Im not autistic im retarded the two are easily confused for one another
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:12 am to OWLFAN86
quote:
This type of thread is getting gayer and gayer
AI is so unoriginal
RA'd for move to Aggie board.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:13 am to Mushroom1968
quote:
Yea it just replied back “who?”
I asked it for a concise review of you..
***Mushroom1968 is a steady regular who seems more interested in discussing topics than winning internet points. Doesn’t rely on gimmicks or constant outrage, and usually keeps things civil even when the subject isn’t.
Overall, Mushroom1968 comes across as thoughtful, level-headed, and willing to engage with opposing views. The kind of poster who generally adds to a thread instead of dragging it off the rails.***
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:13 am to OWLFAN86
quote:
Im not autistic im retarded the two are easily confused for one another
Give me the tard take then
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:16 am to SallysHuman
Doggie
Boobies
Lezzie
U seem to have higher than average free time
You seem pleasant enough
I like bacon
Boobies
Lezzie
U seem to have higher than average free time
You seem pleasant enough
I like bacon
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:19 am to OWLFAN86
quote:
OWLFAN86
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:32 am to RanchoLaPuerto
grizzlylongcut is a longtime active poster on TigerDroppings.com (TD), the popular LSU sports and fan message board. ?
Profile Basics
• Joined: September 17, 2021 (Member since Sep 2021).
• Posts: Around 15,700–15,800+ as of recent data (very active, posting multiple times per day). ?
• Favorite team: LSU.
• Bio/Location/Occupation/Interests: Blank or minimal on the public profile.
The username likely references Grizzly Long Cut (a popular smokeless tobacco/dip product), which aligns with occasional dip-related discussions on the O-T Lounge board where similar brands are mentioned. ?
Posting Style and Activity
• High volume and consistent: Posts across Tiger Rant (LSU sports), Politics, O-T Lounge, Movie/TV, and more. Frequently replies in active threads on LSU baseball/football, current events, culture, and religion. ?
• Tone: Direct, opinionated, and often blunt/conservative-leaning. Common themes in recent posts include:
• Strong opposition to illegal immigration (“catapulted from our coasts,” etc.).
• Criticism of progressive policies, “woke” culture, and government overreach.
• Protestant Christian perspectives (e.g., debates on salvation, Catholicism vs. Protestantism, citing Romans 10:9-10 and “remembrance” in communion). ?
• Casual sports commentary, pop culture (e.g., Game of Thrones/House of the Dragon critiques), and everyday topics.
• Engages in back-and-forth debates, quotes others frequently, and doesn’t shy from strong language or sarcasm.
In short, grizzlylongcut is a dedicated, prolific TD user known for frequent, no-frills posting—especially on politics and LSU topics—since late 2021. Like many on the board, they’re deeply engaged in the LSU fan community but branch out into broader discussions. No major drama or standout “fame” beyond typical active poster status stands out in public searches.
Profile Basics
• Joined: September 17, 2021 (Member since Sep 2021).
• Posts: Around 15,700–15,800+ as of recent data (very active, posting multiple times per day). ?
• Favorite team: LSU.
• Bio/Location/Occupation/Interests: Blank or minimal on the public profile.
The username likely references Grizzly Long Cut (a popular smokeless tobacco/dip product), which aligns with occasional dip-related discussions on the O-T Lounge board where similar brands are mentioned. ?
Posting Style and Activity
• High volume and consistent: Posts across Tiger Rant (LSU sports), Politics, O-T Lounge, Movie/TV, and more. Frequently replies in active threads on LSU baseball/football, current events, culture, and religion. ?
• Tone: Direct, opinionated, and often blunt/conservative-leaning. Common themes in recent posts include:
• Strong opposition to illegal immigration (“catapulted from our coasts,” etc.).
• Criticism of progressive policies, “woke” culture, and government overreach.
• Protestant Christian perspectives (e.g., debates on salvation, Catholicism vs. Protestantism, citing Romans 10:9-10 and “remembrance” in communion). ?
• Casual sports commentary, pop culture (e.g., Game of Thrones/House of the Dragon critiques), and everyday topics.
• Engages in back-and-forth debates, quotes others frequently, and doesn’t shy from strong language or sarcasm.
In short, grizzlylongcut is a dedicated, prolific TD user known for frequent, no-frills posting—especially on politics and LSU topics—since late 2021. Like many on the board, they’re deeply engaged in the LSU fan community but branch out into broader discussions. No major drama or standout “fame” beyond typical active poster status stands out in public searches.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:37 am to RanchoLaPuerto
As your username, Buck Magnum is memorable and has a strong, confident sound. The name suggests a few things:
* Rugged and outdoorsy. “Buck” brings to mind hunting, wildlife, or a rural background.
* Bold and powerful. “Magnum” conveys the idea of something larger, stronger, or high-performance.
* Easy to remember. It’s distinctive without being complicated, which is a good quality for a forum username.
* A little playful. Because “Magnum” has been used in everything from TV shows to products and pop culture, it has a slightly over-the-top, larger-than-life feel that some people will find entertaining.
On a forum like Tigerdroppings, where colorful usernames are common, “Buck Magnum” fits in well. It comes across as confident and a bit tongue-in-cheek rather than overly serious.
Overall, I’d describe it as a username that’s rugged, memorable, and a little larger than life. It has personality without being difficult to recognize or remember.
* Rugged and outdoorsy. “Buck” brings to mind hunting, wildlife, or a rural background.
* Bold and powerful. “Magnum” conveys the idea of something larger, stronger, or high-performance.
* Easy to remember. It’s distinctive without being complicated, which is a good quality for a forum username.
* A little playful. Because “Magnum” has been used in everything from TV shows to products and pop culture, it has a slightly over-the-top, larger-than-life feel that some people will find entertaining.
On a forum like Tigerdroppings, where colorful usernames are common, “Buck Magnum” fits in well. It comes across as confident and a bit tongue-in-cheek rather than overly serious.
Overall, I’d describe it as a username that’s rugged, memorable, and a little larger than life. It has personality without being difficult to recognize or remember.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:38 am to RanchoLaPuerto
Okay, I'm game. What it say about mine?
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:43 am to OscarTheGrouch
Post regularly? You've been here 20 years and I thought you were new.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:48 am to fr33manator
quote:
Okay, I'm game. What it say about mine?
I directed ChatGPT to make is concise and humorous.
***fr33manator is the guy who somehow turns a random Tuesday into a 40-page thread. Equal parts detective, storyteller, and chaos coordinator, he has a knack for making the OT collectively abandon work for an afternoon.
Whether he’s posting a clever one-liner or accidentally leading the board into another legendary saga, people tend to stop and read. If the OT ever issued pensions, he’d probably qualify.***
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:52 am to SallysHuman
quote:
ChatGPT says I’m awesome and regularly beat down 4cubbies.
I normally frown on people beating up the intellectually disabled, but in this case I'll allow it.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:55 am to RanchoLaPuerto
ChatGPT prompt:
Summarize the type poster, John Casey, is on tigerdroppings.com
Based on his public posting history and profile, **John Casey** appears to be a long-time, active TigerDroppings poster (member since 2016, with over 3,600 posts) whose activity is concentrated on LSU athletics, especially football.
His posting style can be summarized as follows:
* **Analytical rather than emotional.** He often pushes back against what he sees as overreactions from the LSU fan base, arguing for patience with coaching searches, roster building, and long-term program decisions.
* **Independent-minded.** While clearly an LSU fan, he frequently disagrees with popular opinions on the Tiger Rant. For example, he has argued that fans overvalue certain former coaches or staff members and that LSU supporters can be too quick to demand coaching changes.
* **Frequent sports debater.** His comments cover coaching hires, football strategy, recruiting, college football, the NFL, and basketball. He often supports his arguments with examples from other programs or historical context.
* **Pragmatic tone.** His posts generally avoid excessive hype or doom-and-gloom. He tends to focus on what he considers realistic outcomes rather than emotional reactions.
* **Occasional humor and sarcasm.** He uses light sarcasm or jokes (for example, poking fun at LSU fans' tendency to want to fire a head coach while keeping the entire coaching staff), but most of his posts are straightforward rather than comedic.
In terms of community reception, his posts receive a mix of positive and negative votes, suggesting that he often expresses opinions that are not universally popular but that also generate discussion. The available public information does not indicate that he is one of the forum's celebrity posters or major provocateurs; instead, he appears to be a regular, opinionated contributor who frequently challenges prevailing narratives on LSU sports.
Summarize the type poster, John Casey, is on tigerdroppings.com
Based on his public posting history and profile, **John Casey** appears to be a long-time, active TigerDroppings poster (member since 2016, with over 3,600 posts) whose activity is concentrated on LSU athletics, especially football.
His posting style can be summarized as follows:
* **Analytical rather than emotional.** He often pushes back against what he sees as overreactions from the LSU fan base, arguing for patience with coaching searches, roster building, and long-term program decisions.
* **Independent-minded.** While clearly an LSU fan, he frequently disagrees with popular opinions on the Tiger Rant. For example, he has argued that fans overvalue certain former coaches or staff members and that LSU supporters can be too quick to demand coaching changes.
* **Frequent sports debater.** His comments cover coaching hires, football strategy, recruiting, college football, the NFL, and basketball. He often supports his arguments with examples from other programs or historical context.
* **Pragmatic tone.** His posts generally avoid excessive hype or doom-and-gloom. He tends to focus on what he considers realistic outcomes rather than emotional reactions.
* **Occasional humor and sarcasm.** He uses light sarcasm or jokes (for example, poking fun at LSU fans' tendency to want to fire a head coach while keeping the entire coaching staff), but most of his posts are straightforward rather than comedic.
In terms of community reception, his posts receive a mix of positive and negative votes, suggesting that he often expresses opinions that are not universally popular but that also generate discussion. The available public information does not indicate that he is one of the forum's celebrity posters or major provocateurs; instead, he appears to be a regular, opinionated contributor who frequently challenges prevailing narratives on LSU sports.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:56 am to SallysHuman
quote:
SallysHuman
Welp, it's finally figured it out I guess. Thanks!
Posted on 6/26/26 at 9:58 am to RanchoLaPuerto
I had Chat GPT running IQ tests over a year ago
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News