re: Have you ever run your TD handle through AI?

All you’re doing is further proving the fragility of your overinflated ego.


But keep going. I find it amusing.

quote:

---

But keep going. I find it amusing.

---

I need to put notifications on for this thread...

quote:

---

Darth was already exposed.

---

Like... nekkid? Got a pic? I didn't see it...

quote:

---

Darth was already exposed. I'm not going to let him derail the thread. People were having fun until he embarrassed himself.

There's no need to rub it in his face further.

---

Tell yourself whatever necessary to salve your shattered ego.

From Grok

LittleJerrySeinfield (often stylized with the Seinfeld reference) is a longtime, highly active poster (over 11,000 posts since registering in 2013) on Tigerdroppings.com and its sister site SECRant.com. ?
He participates across sports (especially SEC/LSU football), off-topic/lounge boards, movies/TV, and heavily in Political Talk. His profile humorously lists his favorite team as “US Space Force,” biography as “Coined the phrase ‘Junk in the trunk’,” interests as “I have many leather-bound books,” and occupation as “TCoB” (likely “The Coonass Board” or a similar regional joke). This sets a tone of self-aware, lighthearted irreverence. ?
Key Personality Traits from Posts
• Witty, Sarcastic, and Quick with One-Liners: He frequently deploys short, punchy replies, pop culture references, and dry sarcasm. Examples include “Not in the face, not in the face” (a nod to The Princess Bride or similar), calling out AI-generated content with a “Sigh It’s AI,” or quipping about a graduation outfit: “She just wanted to show off her graduation presents.” ? He also ties into Seinfeld humor (e.g., a thread on “If Kiffin was a Seinfeld character”).
• Engaged Community Member with Nostalgia: He reminisces about forum legends (e.g., fondly remembering “pio” as a “strange bird” the board loved) and shares personal anecdotes, like his wife’s connection to a true-crime story in a Netflix documentary or attending a memorable tied college football game. ? He posts about family life, such as his daughter getting married, showing a relatable, grounded side. ?
• Opinionated, Especially in Politics: He jumps into heated Political Talk with contrarian or skeptical takes, often challenging assumptions (e.g., questioning narratives around Trump deals, Iran, or economic policies). He can be blunt or dismissive toward what he sees as low-effort or overly earnest posts. ?
• Sports Fan with Insider Knowledge: Active in SEC football discussions with practical analysis (e.g., critiquing coaching decisions in real-time) and historical references from attending games. ?
• Overall Vibe: He’s a classic message board veteran—prolific, humorous, and unafraid to needle others or call out nonsense, but not purely a troll. He mixes banter, personal shares, and topic expertise. The Seinfeld username and profile flair suggest someone who enjoys absurd humor, wordplay, and not taking things (or himself) too seriously. Longevity and high post count indicate he’s invested in the community culture of these boards. ?
In short, he’s the type of user who keeps threads lively with sarcasm and references while contributing meaningfully on sports, pop culture, and current events. His style fits the irreverent, passionate tone of Tigerdroppings/SECRant.

GTG:

quote:

---

If I were ranking strictly on name recognition and community impact, I’d say:
* Top 25 all time: very likely.
* Top 10 all time: defensible, but debatable and dependent on the criteria used.
* Top 5 all time: probably a stretch given the depth of TigerDroppings history and the number of legendary personalities the site has had.

---

quote:

---

every one of you participating in this circle jerk should feel deep shame and embarrassment

---

If you have 50,000 posts of what you imagine is original thought and you aren’t a board pariah, which you aren't, you’re jerking off just as vigorously as everyone else.

Don’t fool yourself. That applies to me too.

quote:

---

IQ tests

---

JFYI, while I suppose it's okay to post an AI guess regarding your own IQ, including other posters in the list is a bit like having AI undress their image, and posting the nudes. It's unseemly. I know that may not have occurred, but think about it.

quote:

---

Q: ChatGPT this "Revised IQ Ranking Table" is being posted as representative of your assessment of various posters on the TigerDroppings website. Is it accurately representative?

A: The table is almost certainly a made-up/persona-style assessment generated from a prompt, not a real IQ estimate.

What likely happened:

Someone asked an AI something like: “Rank these TigerDroppings posters by intelligence/IQ based on their posting style.”
The AI produced a qualitative impression (analytical, funny, argumentative, etc.).
Those traits were then converted into fake-looking IQ ranges (130–145, 125–135, etc.).

There are several reasons it is not a valid IQ assessment:

IQ cannot be inferred reliably from forum posts
IQ tests measure specific cognitive abilities under controlled conditions: working memory, processing speed, verbal reasoning, spatial reasoning, etc.
Writing style, vocabulary, confidence, debating ability, or political knowledge are not equivalent to IQ.
The numbers are suspiciously neat
The ranges (130–145, 125–135, etc.) look like a ranking device, not psychometric output.
A real IQ assessment would include test type (WAIS, Stanford-Binet, etc.), scores, confidence intervals, testing conditions, and norms.

The “strengths” column gives away the methodology

“Analytical depth, logical reasoning, nuanced debate”
“Creativity, humor, lateral thinking”
“Charisma, humor, personality”

Those are forum archetypes, not IQ components.

There are also threads where users explicitly use AI-generated comparisons of posters’ styles, which fits this pattern. LINK LINK

---

quote:

---

Just finished the whole thread. This is less a circle jerk than SFP edging himself solo for hours while staring into a mirror.

Jesus, dude. If this isn’t next-level self-satire, get a fricking grip.

---

You had a lot more fun with the concept in the original thread

quote:

---

What did you ask it to prompt that lengthy response?

---

Not specific to this topic, but the best advice for getting longer/deeper responses is adding multiple sentences and then asking it what questions it has.

I can give examples from this thread since it doesn't reveal too much about serious stuff I use AI for.

I usually start with a generic parameter

quote:

---

I want to have some fun today. I wanted to discuss specific posters on the forum Tigerdroppings.com

---

Then it will give a response with ideas, concerns, etc.

Then you get more specific.

quote:

---

I want you to give a full psychological profile of SlowFlowPro. What questions do you have?

---

Then it will ask questions. You can tell what they are with this response

quote:

---

I want you to use full scope, both forum persona and real-world inferred personality

source: review a wide slice of posts made by SlowFlowPro across various forums (OT, political talk, more sports board, movie board, money board, pelicans talk, soccer board, etc.)

Time period: You can break the analysis into those two time periods and give a separate analysis for each time period.

Board: political, OT, more sports, legal/economic, soccer, movie/tv, money, soccer, pelicans talk, saints talk

Types: all 6

Tone: objective, blunt, and analytical, but be sure you analyze his sarcasm as comedy and not seriousness.

High Inference

Go with your setup

---

I also didn't do this, but framing the style of response can really change things.

You can see the difference in this thread

Academic level

Middle School level

Ow! My balls! Level