re: Have you ever run your TD handle through AI?

SallysHuman

I appreciate that

It said I’m the best welder

quote:

---

Shucks. All I have left is my voluminous history of actual IQ tests, academic history, and reputation.

---

And your somewhat well-known nickname of....
Mr Friendzone...

ChatGPT:

"Based on publicly visible posts, UFFan has a fairly recognizable posting style on TigerDroppings/SECRant, but it's important to distinguish observable patterns from subjective opinions.

Some characteristics that stand out:

Very active poster. The account has been registered since August 2016 and has accumulated thousands of posts across multiple boards. The profile lists Florida as the favorite team and "Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy" as the location.
Starts a lot of discussion threads. Rather than only replying, UFFan frequently creates topics about college football, movies, politics, AI, social issues, and general current events.
Interested in college football history and rankings. Many posts involve debates over blue-blood programs, coaching evaluations, conference comparisons, and historical trends.
egular participant in culture-war and political discussions. Public posts generally show anti-"woke" viewpoints on topics such as gender issues and Pride Month, while occasionally criticizing aspects of forum culture as well.
Often plays devil's advocate. Even when many users on the forum agree with him politically, there are examples where he pushes back against common narratives or argues for a more nuanced historical or sports-related point, which sometimes draws disagreement
Mixed reception from other users. Some of his threads receive positive engagement, while many comments accumulate significant downvotes, especially on controversial topics. That's fairly common on TigerDroppings, where voting is often influenced by board politics and the topic itself.

Overall, UFFan comes across as someone who:

enjoys debate,
posts frequently across sports, politics, and entertainment,
has a generally anti-woke perspective,
isn't afraid to post unpopular opinions, even when they attract criticism,
and tends to keep discussions going through follow-up replies rather than dropping a single comment.
As with any forum user, this impression is based only on publicly visible posts and may not reflect the person's views or personality outside the site."

WE HAVE AN IQ-OFF (From ChatGPT, Gemini can't actually read the posts)

For TigerDroppings, I would not equate “best poster” with “highest IQ.” TD rewards speed, aggression, tribal fluency, humor, and board-specific lore. Political Talk especially rewards posters who articulate the board’s dominant worldview or who can survive as credible dissenters; one forum thread discussing respected Political Talk posters explicitly says respect there often comes from visibility, influence, consistency, sharp takes, or challenging the dominant vibe “without folding,” not necessarily academic polish. ([tigerdroppings.com][1])

So I would score posters on five traits:

**1. Abstract reasoning** — can they move above the immediate topic?
**2. Argument discipline** — do they separate premises, evidence, and conclusions?
**3. Verbal precision** — do they use language carefully?
**4. Domain knowledge** — law, economics, sports analytics, history, politics, etc.
**5. Independence** — can they disagree with the board without becoming stupid or reactive?

That gives a different ranking than “funniest,” “most dominant,” or “most liked.”

---

# Overall highest-IQ phenotype candidates

## 1. **SlowFlowPro**

If I had to make one “highest real-world IQ phenotype” pick, it would probably be **SlowFlowPro**.

He shows the strongest blend of verbal reasoning, legal/economic framing, cross-domain recall, definitional precision, and stamina. His profile shows absurd volume — 479,405 posts as of the page I saw — but the important thing is not volume alone. The recent samples show a pattern: he corrects digressions, makes legal distinctions, narrows definitions, and brings external factual memory into arguments. Examples include correcting a poster’s “digression attempt,” noting an EU Microsoft fine, distinguishing plea/sentencing consequences in federal court, and parsing modern uses of “socialism.” ([tigerdroppings.com][2])

**Estimated IQ phenotype:** 130–145.
**Strengths:** verbal IQ, legal reasoning, fast retrieval, debate endurance, concept-splitting.
**Weakness:** can become too combative, too certain, and too “lawyer-brained,” which can make him look less wise than smart.
**Board fit:** high across OT and Political Talk; probably less emotionally persuasive than analytically dominant.

He is the kind of poster who likely scores well on verbal reasoning, information, similarities, and argument-structure tasks. I would not assume elite mathematical IQ from posts alone, but his verbal/analytic profile is very high.

---

## 2. **HempHead**

HempHead is the cleanest “forum consensus plus observed style” pick. A 2017 OT “Top 20 Posters” thread literally calls him “maybe the smartest poster on the OT” and describes him as versatile, with activity on Political Talk too. ([tigerdroppings.com][3])

That matters because on TD, the “smart poster” label is not thrown around neutrally. It usually means someone can do humor, politics, cultural knowledge, and thread combat without looking like a try-hard. HempHead’s apparent strength is not just facts; it is synthesis. He tends to read as someone with wide associative range, cultural literacy, and quick verbal pattern recognition.

**Estimated IQ phenotype:** 125–140.
**Strengths:** verbal intelligence, cultural breadth, wit, abstraction, ideological flexibility.
**Weakness:** less evidence of technical rigor than SFP; more “highly intelligent conversationalist” than “formal analyst.”
**Board fit:** unusually strong because he can cross OT and Political Talk without losing his voice.

He may be the most naturally intelligent “forum voice,” even if SFP is the stronger formal-argument machine.

---

## 3. **MrCarton**

MrCarton is a strong Political Talk candidate because the praise around him is not just “he agrees with us.” In one thread accusing him of being a troll, multiple posters defend him as one of the best posters on the board. One poster says his opinions are worth paying attention to, especially on foreign policy, and calls him “the grownup in the room”; another calls him one of the absolute best posters on the board. ([tigerdroppings.com][4])

That kind of praise is more meaningful when it comes in a hostile or disputed thread. It suggests he is not merely popular; he has a reputation for serious reasoning under pressure.

**Estimated IQ phenotype:** 125–140.
**Strengths:** foreign policy reasoning, contrarian discipline, adult-in-the-room energy, resistance to mob logic.
**Weakness:** may be too niche; possibly less versatile outside geopolitical/political threads.
**Board fit:** high among people who value serious argument; polarizing among people who want tribal affirmation.

MrCarton reads less like a “fastest guy in the thread” and more like a “careful independent thinker.”

---

## 4. **Pettifogger**

Pettifogger is the understated-intelligence archetype. The same OT list calls him underrated because his style is not attention-grabbing, but says he “consistently brings solid, intelligent takes.” ([tigerdroppings.com][3])

This is important. On a forum like TD, loudness can counterfeit intelligence. Pettifogger’s profile, at least reputationally, is the opposite: lower theatricality, higher judgment. That usually correlates more with real-world professional intelligence than with forum dominance.

**Estimated IQ phenotype:** 120–135.
**Strengths:** judgment, restraint, clarity, adult reasoning.
**Weakness:** less performative brilliance; may not overwhelm threads.
**Board fit:** respected more by careful readers than by the mob.

If I were picking “most likely to be smarter in real life than he appears online,” Pettifogger would be near the top.

---

## 5. **SCLibertarian / LimaWhiskey**

I pair them because forum reputation links them. A Political Talk thread was titled around the claim that **LimaWhiskey and SCLibertarian** were the best politics posters, and the OP praised them for “real perspective,” “historical information,” and posts on more serious issues that get buried by lower-quality noise. ([tigerdroppings.com][5]) Other posters in that thread describe SCLibertarian as logically consistent, including one calling him a consistent libertarian. ([tigerdroppings.com][5])

**Estimated IQ phenotype:** 120–135.
**Strengths:** historical reasoning, first-principles politics, ideological consistency, seriousness.
**Weakness:** libertarian posters can sometimes become too deductive: strong principles, weaker empirical flexibility.
**Board fit:** high among readers who want depth; lower among posters who want election-season combat.

SCLibertarian is probably not the highest raw-processing-speed poster, but his intellectual identity appears unusually coherent.

---

LSUPIMP — A legendary and polarizing figure of TigerDroppings lore, perhaps best known for having predicted in February 2011 that Donald Trump would one day become President of the United States, years before most political observers considered the possibility remotely plausible. To admirers, this prediction cemented his reputation as unusually perceptive, strategically insightful, and possessed of a near-preternatural ability to identify political undercurrents long before they entered the mainstream.

Equally famous for his razor-sharp wit and relentless satirical style, LSUPIMP became a formidable presence in political discussions, deploying sarcasm, humor, and biting commentary to dismantle opposing arguments. His supporters regard him as prescient, intellectually fearless, and often frustratingly correct. His critics—particularly the board’s progressive contingent—have frequently viewed him as provocative, irreverent, and merciless in debate.

Whether considered a political prophet, a master satirist, or simply one of the great characters in TigerDroppings history, LSUPIMP remains a memorable and enduring figure whose predictions and commentary continue to be discussed long after the original threads have faded into forum legend.

How Admirers View Him

Supporters appear to regard him as:

* unusually perceptive,
* entertaining,
* willing to say unpopular things,
* and occasionally prescient in identifying broader political or cultural trends.

How Critics View Him

Critics would likely characterize the same style as:

* overconfident,
* combative,
* reductionist,
* and more interested in rhetorical dominance than collaborative discussion.

His goal often does not appear to be simply to prove a proposition true or false. Rather, the goal appears to be to provide a larger explanatory narrative about human behavior, while simultaneously entertaining allies and provoking opponents. In that sense, the style is closer to a columnist or essayist persona than to a traditional message-board debater.

***And I thought it was going to focus on my Anti- Gumpism. I am disappoint.

quote:

---

From their public posting history, they tend to:

Participate heavily in the O-T Lounge, but also post on the Tiger Rant, More Sports, and other boards.
Share news articles, YouTube videos, and discussion starters rather than only replying to others. Examples include threads about:
Juvenile's Tiny Desk Concert.
Cryptocurrency and finance commentary.
LSU athletics.
Urban planning and transportation.
Criminal trials (such as the widely discussed Karen Read case).

Their posting style is generally:

Dry and sarcastic, often using humor.
Interested in economics, public policy, transportation, finance, and technology.
Willing to argue unpopular positions—for example, advocating for denser, more walkable cities and criticizing suburban development, which has generated debate with other users.

---

Denser, walkable cities are based as frick and suburbs are cringe and gay.

ETA:

quote:

---

jclem11 is a long-time TigerDroppings poster (member since November 2011) with the custom title "Chief Nihilist." They are a frequent contributor who tends to post on politics, current events, technology, urbanism, finance, and LSU sports. Their style is sarcastic, argumentative, and skeptical, and they often challenge conservative viewpoints on the site's politics board, making them a polarizing figure who regularly attracts strong disagreement from other users.

---

quote:

---

Based on their publicly visible posting history, RemyLeBeau appears to be a moderate, skeptical, discussion-oriented poster rather than a partisan cheerleader or prolific troll.

Some patterns that stand out:

Frequently asks questions rather than making declarations. Many of their Political Talk posts challenge assumptions by asking things like "When was this supposed to happen?" or "What does this mean?" instead of asserting conclusions.
Willing to question multiple sides. Their comments show skepticism toward U.S. government narratives, media narratives, and foreign policy, while also questioning claims made by other posters. They don't consistently defend one faction.
Not highly ideological. Compared with many regulars on TigerDroppings' Political Talk board—which has a reputation for being strongly conservative—they come across as more of a pragmatic or contrarian participant than someone promoting a rigid ideology.
Posts across multiple boards. They participate in Political Talk, O-T Lounge, Outdoor Board, Tiger Rant, and Movie/TV Board, suggesting they're a general community member rather than someone focused exclusively on politics.
Generally conversational. Most posts are short replies, requests for clarification, or observations. There isn't a pattern of long manifestos or frequent personal attacks, though they occasionally engage in sarcasm like many TigerDroppings users.

If I had to put a label on their posting style, I'd describe it as:

Skeptical
Question-driven
Moderately contrarian
Relatively civil by TigerDroppings standards
Not obviously aligned with the dominant faction in every discussion

Keep in mind this is an assessment of their public posting style, not their personal beliefs. Online forum posts don't necessarily reflect someone's complete views, and a user's style can change over time.

---

quote:

---

ChatBPT:

It says on your chart that you're fricked up. Ah, you talk like a fig, and your shite's all retarded.

---