- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Have women bitten off more than they can chew w/(family courts/marriage/divorce)
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:22 am to kingbob
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:22 am to kingbob
Being a bachelor now for over two years, I regret daily getting married. Complete waste of half of my life. I'm very thankful for my kids, of course, but if I could rewind to the day I decided to buy her a ring, I wouldn't do it. I should have listened to my other friends that were getting screwed over.
Once a woman decides she is done with her husband, she can just stop doing whatever for him, then leave whenever, and be rewarded. Screwed up system, but that is reality. The majority of my friends that were solid couples in college are now divorced as well. Same story each time: Husband could no longer meet the demands of the wife, while she didn't "have the time or energy" for them. Our society encourages this behavior in women. Couple that with miserable friends, and you have a recipe for disaster.
Let's also not forget the lawyers. Lawyers are literally the only people who benefit from a divorce. Yeah, a woman will get paid off, but in the end, a huge chunk of that goes to the lawyer too.
Once a woman decides she is done with her husband, she can just stop doing whatever for him, then leave whenever, and be rewarded. Screwed up system, but that is reality. The majority of my friends that were solid couples in college are now divorced as well. Same story each time: Husband could no longer meet the demands of the wife, while she didn't "have the time or energy" for them. Our society encourages this behavior in women. Couple that with miserable friends, and you have a recipe for disaster.
Let's also not forget the lawyers. Lawyers are literally the only people who benefit from a divorce. Yeah, a woman will get paid off, but in the end, a huge chunk of that goes to the lawyer too.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:23 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
will say Type A is better off with type A. Two materialistic, linear types are probably better off together than with someone who doesn't think like they do.
I don’t think this is true. I think type A people need a calmer, more unfocused type to balance them out. When people are too similar in a relationship, their strengths are doubled, but so are their weaknesses. They can’t provide what the other lacks because they lack it too.
A good marriage is two people who as a unit are better than the sum of their parts. They work as a team to accomplish their goals. When the team members each bring the same skills, then that team can be hyper competent when those skills are needed, but they will also be completely dysfunctional when confronted with problems that cannot be solved with those skills.
I once dated a girl who was incredibly similar to me. With few exceptions, our skill sets, mindsets, and habits were incredibly similar. Our friends all thought it was a perfect match. However, we actually were each other’s enabler. Our doubled-down personalities left the “team” completely unbalanced with massive skill deficiencies in critical areas. Neither of us served as the handbrake to the other’s self-destructive or selfish tendencies because we had the same tendencies. No one was willing to be the adult in the room because we both catered to the other’s inner child. We’d have tons of fun together, but then we’d fall apart over the stupidest things because neither had the skills or personality to solve those issues. We’re still good friends, but it became clear quickly that a long term romantic relationship just wouldn’t work because we would basically placate the other to death. We each needed a different type of person to help us find balance.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 10:31 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:24 am to EZE Tiger Fan
Yet another example where all the fault lies with the woman...
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 10:24 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:24 am to oogabooga68
quote:Truth.
It has gotten to the point where Society views men as nothing more than a punchline , while women, no matter how slovenly, stupid or worthless they might be, are Superheros with zero faults.
Just as an example of catering to the lazy and obese, have you ever noticed that there are no overweight or obese male mannequins?
It is just a funny dichotomy when it comes to social cues and marketing.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:27 am to oogabooga68
quote:
In 2023, Society/Media/Hollywood is focused ENTIRELY on the needs and wants of women.
It has given birth to this crazy "Princess" fantasy where a woman can do anything she wants with zero repercussions and at the end of the day, still have it all.
I grew up in the 90's and my sister's watched movies that fit this exact bill. That ain't new
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:27 am to tigergirl10
quote:
Too many people, men and women waste a lot of time with someone who is showing them obvious signs they’re not interested in the long haul or them
Don't "show signs." Be direct and forward like an adult should. This mind game bullshite is another problem in the dating pool right now too.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:29 am to tigerbandpiccolo
quote:This is different. You are mixing up two different points. Division of Labor and Skillset.
That doesn’t mean I don’t know how to cook.
Knowing how to cook, but doing less of it, is a Division of Labor decision which most are OK with.
Simply not knowing how to cook is a skillset problem that most DO have a problem with.
Why would a family minded person want to start a family with someone who cannot properly care for children when their spouse is not present for a period of time for work or whatever?
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:29 am to The Top G
quote:
While that can and is certainly true, this thread totally ignores the other side of the coin.
This is absolutely true and why it’s important for men to take responsibility for the things they can change about themselves. Don’t be fat and complacent. Always have a mission. You literally cannot justifiably complain about how bad things are if you don’t get yourself in order, 100%.
The issue this thread is focused on is that even if you DO take care of business and do everything right as a man, you can still get totally destroyed by marriage simply because you’re a man and the system is openly, brazenly, proudly biased against men. And there are a lot of rah-rah girl boss type women who cheer this development on and then complain that they can’t find a good man to marry them. It’s crazy!
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:29 am to The Top G
quote:
That ain't new
Maybe not, but in 2023 the intent is much more nefarious and the messaging is much more over the top.
Every woman is a thing of beauty, an infallible Princess who should never have anything "mansplained" to her is the message being delivered with all the subtlety of a jack-hammer.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 10:30 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:30 am to burger bearcat
quote:
not get fat
quote:Then why are so many men fat? Just look around.
Men want a woman
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:30 am to Displaced
The fault always lies with both, but only one side is rewarded for the outcome.
Neither side should be punished or rewarded.
Neither side should be punished or rewarded.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:31 am to Scruffy
quote:
It is just a funny dichotomy when it comes to social cues and marketing.
And dovetails back to the pictures of girls on Social Media joking about a dude's height, then going nuclear over questioning their physical shortcomings.
The irony is that being FAT is something you can control, while being less than 7' tall is something you can't....
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:34 am to LouisianaLady
quote:
But I think a lot of the reason both men and women can't find good partners when dating as adults is because the good partners.. have good partners. Mature, reasonable people found other mature, reasonable people when they were younger and they still remain married.
I think the reason a lot of people can't find good partners is that they have an unyielding idea of what they think that a good partner is. They look at what their friends have, what TV and social media tells them they should have, and think if it's good for them it must be good for me too.
But if that type of man/woman isn't choosing *you* as well, then that's a pretty clear indication that for whatever reason, that type of person isn't a good fit for you, at least as you currently exist. So the choice is clear, either change who you are fundamentally, or adjust your expectations.
But social programming is hard to overcome and people will hang on to this idea of what they think is right for them in the face of overwhelming evidence. People don't like to be wrong so it's easier to say "there are no good men/women" than it is to say that they learned the wrong things about what they should be looking for.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 10:35 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:36 am to burger bearcat
I work in a female dominated profession. All the married females do is complain about their spouse. The non-married ones will complain about everything under the sun.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:40 am to Goldrush25
quote:
But if that type of man/woman isn't choosing *you* as well, then that's a pretty clear indication that for whatever reason, that type of person isn't a good fit for you, at least as you currently exist. So the choice is clear, either change who you are fundamentally, or adjust your expectations.
I had to learn this the hard way. I realized that what was healthy for me and what I was attracting were actually two polar opposite kinds of women. The more I improved my mental health, the more I realized that my mental state was attracting a very specific type of woman who desired exploiting that state. As I improved, I started attracting women more like what I wanted.
I think women work in much the same way, but popular culture doesn’t tell them that. They are just told it’s always the man’s fault and all men suck. As such, they never evaluate why they seem to attract the same kind of guy over and over again.
The reality is that all people attract based different kinds of people based on unconscious and non-verbal cues. These cues most often stem from their unconscious mental image of themselves. An insecure people-pleaser will attract a narcissistic user. A confident and calm person will attract a driven and motivated person.
Improving one’s mental health will drastically change the type of people they attract, not just their conscious expectations or boundaries.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 10:43 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:42 am to Scruffy
quote:I agree with all of that. I'm just pointing out the common delusion in the divorce posts on TD that the blame the ex wife for everything with absolutely 0 self reflection.
The fault always lies with both, but only one side is rewarded for the outcome.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:43 am to Displaced
Probably because people tend to blame the initiator for the divorce, and women initiate the overwhelming majority of all divorces. Throw in the fact that this board is predominantly male.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 10:44 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:45 am to oogabooga68
quote:
has gotten to the point where Society views men as nothing more than a punchline , while women, no matter how slovenly, stupid or worthless they might be, are Superheros with zero faults.
Nah, it’s just that men are just as insecure as women, if not more.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:45 am to burger bearcat
Women will have never bitten off more than they can chew until they stop being propped up by men.
If you gave women the same conditional love that men get, as a group they wouldn't be able to handle it. Sure some could but the majority could not provide for themselves much less a child.
Women may have lots of problems, but unconditional love & a financial safety net are not on the list in a general sense.
If you gave women the same conditional love that men get, as a group they wouldn't be able to handle it. Sure some could but the majority could not provide for themselves much less a child.
Women may have lots of problems, but unconditional love & a financial safety net are not on the list in a general sense.
Popular
Back to top


2




