- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
OKBoomerSooner
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 4958 |
| Registered on: | 12/2/2019 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Will Ohio State ever win again?
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 1/3/26 at 5:28 am to Crimson K
Honest answer? No.
re: Alabama got destroyed on the national stage yesterday and I was indifferent about it.
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 1/3/26 at 5:26 am to Chicken
Honestly sounds like they should just shut down the program and let the players transfer to UAB.
re: Tulsa Football Rented/Created a “Portal House”
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 1/2/26 at 10:58 pm to OU Guy
quote:
Additionally, a device measures indoor decibels and notifies owner when it exceeds set limit
They must not need any WRs
re: The New Big 6
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 1/2/26 at 4:02 pm to inelishaitrust
quote:
My question is two part: 1) how would you rank all 16 schools according to program prestige and 2) Which of these programs do you consider elite?
1. Alabama
2. Georgia
3. LSU
4. Oklahoma
5. Texas
--ELITE CUTOFF--
6. Tennessee
7. Texas A&M
8. Ole Miss
9. Missouri
10. Auburn
11. Florida
12. South Carolina
13. Vanderbilt
14. Kentucky
15. Arkansas
16. Mississippi State
re: Indiana might be the first college football team to go 16-0
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 1/2/26 at 2:26 am to harmonics
“Greatest team” in the sense of “who would win in a hypothetical matchup,” no.
Greatest run, relative to program history and resources?
Yes. Not even close.
Greatest run, relative to program history and resources?
Yes. Not even close.
re: Are we really going to get Oregon, Indiana, Ole Miss and Miami?
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 1/2/26 at 2:17 am to bisonduck
quote:
Oregon #5
Makes sense
quote:
Miami #15
That’s pretty impress—
quote:
Ole Miss #21
Wow that’s crazy! No team has ever—
quote:
Indiana #72
:ahh:
re: The 2025 Ohio State team might be the greatest team in College Football history.
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 1/1/26 at 2:44 am to Chicken
LMAO the sticky :bow: :bow: :bow:
re: Does Miami's win change the narrative of there's too many teams in the playoff?
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 1/1/26 at 2:43 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
How many times in pro sports does the top seed win the playoff?
The best teams make the playoffs, hottest team wins it
Right, and because that's normalized for pro sports, that's cool there.
"The whole season IS the playoff, every game matters" has been a vocal sentiment among fans for many years. It used to be a factor distinguishing college football from other sports. I really enjoy the playoffs, but there's no question this charm of the sport is gone.
re: Does Miami's win change the narrative of there's too many teams in the playoff?
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 1/1/26 at 2:41 am to SlowFlowPro
This already happened last year. 24 Ohio State and 25 Miami were both 10-2 at-large P4 teams when their respective playoffs started.
I do agree with your observation that this playoff format (like most) favors teams that get hot late. And at least before the advent of the playoffs, fans mostly said that college football was an awesome sport because the entire season mattered. "The whole season is a playoff," etc. So there's definitely an argument that this format is bad because it threw that away.
I think I would have preferred expansion to six teams and stopping there. But four was fine. I think going beyond eight was a major mistake, but it's not getting fixed
I do agree with your observation that this playoff format (like most) favors teams that get hot late. And at least before the advent of the playoffs, fans mostly said that college football was an awesome sport because the entire season mattered. "The whole season is a playoff," etc. So there's definitely an argument that this format is bad because it threw that away.
I think I would have preferred expansion to six teams and stopping there. But four was fine. I think going beyond eight was a major mistake, but it's not getting fixed
re: The U is BACK
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/31/25 at 9:56 pm to Kinderman
quote:
All-time GIF
re: The U is BACK
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/31/25 at 9:52 pm to Cosmo
Andre Johnson
re: Don’t let this playoff game distract you from the fact that…
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/31/25 at 9:51 pm to whitetiger1234
Any time the B1G Traffickers Conference loses, America wins.
The U :bow: :bow: :bow:
The U :bow: :bow: :bow:
re: 2026: O avg 35, D can’t hold opp under 38
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/30/25 at 1:09 pm to Ellis_Hugh
Strange, because this defense held opponents under 35 (not just 38) in 11 out of 13 games this year.
In the two that it didn't, one was a bowl game with zero stakes where half the team quit, and the other was admittedly a complete arse whooping where the entire team quit on the coach that's no longer here.
Funny enough, I'm looking at how the defense did last year, under the exact same coordinator, and I'm seeing they held opponents under 35 in 11 out of 13 games there, too.
Oddest of all, the defense under that coordinator gave up an average of 21.8 points per game in those two years.
Where is this claim coming from? Doesn't seem supported by the data. :dunno:
In the two that it didn't, one was a bowl game with zero stakes where half the team quit, and the other was admittedly a complete arse whooping where the entire team quit on the coach that's no longer here.
Funny enough, I'm looking at how the defense did last year, under the exact same coordinator, and I'm seeing they held opponents under 35 in 11 out of 13 games there, too.
Oddest of all, the defense under that coordinator gave up an average of 21.8 points per game in those two years.
Where is this claim coming from? Doesn't seem supported by the data. :dunno:
re: Last Minute CLE Check In
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/30/25 at 1:50 am to RanchoLaPuerto
Anybody else find it funny that no one has to explain what CLEs are? This whole damn board is nothing but lawyers :lol:
Carryover for me :pimp:
Carryover for me :pimp:
re: Does it feel to anyone else like LSU has been hated nationally for a bit now?
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/29/25 at 2:59 am to p226
quote:
I think nationally, O was more like a joke. A caricature come to life. I think nationally, they were laughing AT him. They weren't smiling because they liked him.
This. Now scale that up to the entire institution and you have the whole dynamic in a nutshell. LSU and Louisiana aren't allowed to take themselves seriously and try to be better, only allowed to be wild party animals and retarded caricatures who make for great stories but can't get their heads out of their asses.
It's just snobbery. And you deal with snobs by punching them in the face. :geauxtigers:
re: Does it feel to anyone else like LSU has been hated nationally for a bit now?
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/29/25 at 2:56 am to Draconian Sanctions
Some media personalities will always look down on LSU because of Louisiana. LSU is allowed to be elite in football but never to be taken too seriously and treated like an adult in the room. Only allowed to have retarded caricatures like Les and O for head coaches, not self-serious types that want to win, like Lane and (we thought lol rip) Kelly. And certainly not allowed to steal coaches from mighty Notre Dame, even if that turned out to be a blessing for ND.
re: Your thoughts on MVB now?
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/28/25 at 2:46 pm to GetmorewithLes
He's good enough to be great one day, and our head coach is the best guy in America to guide him through that leap.
I don't expect him to be great next year, and I think he could use two offseasons with Lane before he'll be ready.
I don't expect him to be great next year, and I think he could use two offseasons with Lane before he'll be ready.
re: Mizzou’s Damon Wilson takes Georgia to court
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/25/25 at 10:49 am to Jrv2damac
LOL :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
re: Did Nostradamus' Quatrain Predict CFP Quarter Final Winners
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/25/25 at 10:45 am to Delupe
Potentially legendary start to your posting career bro.
re: Can the Thunder win 80 regular season games?
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/24/25 at 5:19 pm to yaboidarrell
Update: I re-ran the numbers and it appears the Thunder are limited to at most 78 regular season wins. Unlucky
re: DK Metcalf just punched a Lions fan in the stands
Posted by OKBoomerSooner on 12/22/25 at 2:35 pm to tigerlion
quote:
Ryan Clark can’t wait to talk about what that fan called him, systemic racism, blah blah blah.
“I just want to ask, and I feel like this is an underexposed angle here so I’ve got to ask. What exactly. was it. that the FAN. Said. Or did. That preceded this behavior by DK. It seems really unlikely that DK just DID IT without any provocation. You have to know. If you’re a fan. Especially of the opposing team. That there are certain things, and we don’t need to go into what those things ARE. I think we all know what those things are. But. There are certain things. That you just can’t do. So my question, did the fan do one of those things? That’s all I’m saying, I’m not accusing anyone, just asking questions.”
—probably Ryan Clark
Popular
0













