Started By
Message

re: GLP-1s found to greatly reduce cancer progression rate in advanced cancers

Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:34 am to
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86239 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:34 am to
quote:

I don't care if they are lazy or not. I don't understand why the OT cares that much.


Insecurity

They are either 1) fat and don't want to take them or exercise and want everyone else to be fat with them or 2) lost weight and somehow feel as though people losing weight with a drug diminished their own weight loss

Its so fricking pathetic
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
16180 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:35 am to
quote:

serious question: if you're 275lbs how active are you going to be?


Just cause you’re fat doesn’t mean you have to be lazy

quote:

do you think if the glp1 helps them to drop 100lbs, they wont naturally feel better and want to be more active at 175 and way less likely to damage their body exercising?


Damage to their body? Absolutely not. Nobody is saying go do a buncha polymerics. The number 1 goal while on that shite should be to preserve as much muscle as possible. You can’t do that eating 1000 cals and shrinking to be skinny fat
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150161 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:35 am to
I'm really getting close to the point in thinking the government needs to subsidize this at this point
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 10:36 am
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
16180 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Insecurity They are either 1) fat and don't want to take them or exercise and want everyone else to be fat with them or 2) lost weight and somehow feel as though people losing weight with a drug diminished their own weight loss Its so fricking pathetic


I’m criticizing it and taking it at the same time sooooo
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86239 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:37 am to
quote:

The number 1 goal while on that shite should be to preserve as much muscle as possible. You can’t do that eating 1000 cals and shrinking to be skinny fat


The #1 goal for most people should be to simply lose the weight. That in itself will make them feel better and fix so many issues.

Once they lose the weight, then they can start to focus on body composition.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
16180 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:38 am to
quote:

The #1 goal for most people should be to simply lose the weight. That in itself will make them feel better and fix so many issues. Once they lose the weight, then they can start to focus on body composition.


Wrong but whatever lol
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130337 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:38 am to
quote:

I'm really getting close to the point in thinking the government needs to subsidize this at this point



I'm already there. I am generally not in favor of it at all, but we do it anyway for all kinds of bullshite

This is one of the few that would be a massive net positive for the tax payer, in theory
Posted by RedSoloSpitCup
Sweet Home Alabama
Member since Jan 2020
13 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Lazy people that weigh 175lbs are going to have far less health problems than lazy people that weigh 275lbs. And are going to cost the taxpayer a lot less as a result


Lazy people that weigh 135 cost just as much as lazy people who weigh 335.

We don't have an obesity problem. We have a lazy problem. Sometimes it manifests as obesity, most of the time it manifests as Democrats.
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 10:39 am
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86239 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Wrong but whatever lol


Its 100% correct.

I'm not saying they shouldn't strength train while losing weight. That would be dumb as everyone should be strength training, whether they are trying to lose weight or not.

But for obese people, simply losing the weight it the most important thing to their health.

That is a fact.
Posted by doc baklava
Between heaven and hell
Member since Oct 2020
1096 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:41 am to
Cancer cells absorb sugar like a fat guy at Krispy Kreme.

I'm assumjng anything that lowers their supply impairs their growth.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
25832 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Wrong but whatever lol


No he is not. If you are obese, first step lose weight. That is 100% what the doctor is going to tell you.

Excessive fat is an anchor on you physically and mentally. Simply losing weight will place you in an overall better feeling place.

The assumption here is you are losing weight willingly and not because of an illness.
Posted by doc baklava
Between heaven and hell
Member since Oct 2020
1096 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:41 am to
I won't debate any further, but I will say this:

It's hard to diet when our food supply isn't so horrible.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130337 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Lazy people that weigh 135 cost just as much as lazy people who weigh 335.

We don't have an obesity problem. We have a lazy problem. Sometimes it manifests as obesity, most of the time it manifests as Democrats.


This is objectively false for healthcare costs
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35576 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:42 am to
These cancer patients should just have more will power and exercise more.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
16180 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Its 100% correct. I'm not saying they shouldn't strength train while losing weight. That would be dumb as everyone should be strength training, whether they are trying to lose weight or not. But for obese people, simply losing the weight it the most important thing to their health. That is a fact.


Sooo you’re saying you’re correct while saying they should strength train. Got it lol. Love you fitness experts on the OT
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
7157 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:43 am to
quote:

GLPs aren’t just for fat people either. I’m using glp3 to go from 12-15% bf to single digit.


So you're lazy too, wow.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130337 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Wrong but whatever lol



The data is completely overwhelming that you are wrong
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
60722 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:44 am to
Ah, the weekly Ozempic is incredible and has no downside thread

These will definitely age well
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86239 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Sooo you’re saying you’re correct while saying they should strength train. Got it lol. Love you fitness experts on the OT


Yes. There is no contradiction there.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
60722 posts
Posted on 5/22/26 at 10:45 am to
quote:

GLPs aren’t just for fat people either. I’m using glp3 to go from 12-15% bf to single digit
what’s it like, being gay?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram