Started By
Message

re: Flight from London to New York turns around 330 miles from North America

Posted on 3/9/25 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
38906 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Taking a guess they called their airline / messaged them, and were told the likely repair would be far cheaper if they turned around and did it in the UK.

I can't imagine they couldn't have gotten it done at JFK

So instead they said frick them baws who had plans we're headed back to England

Pretty shitty of them to do that when they clearly could have made it JFK
This post was edited on 3/9/25 at 12:23 pm
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40408 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Where is the Virgin Atlantic maintenance hub?

Our Engineering teams are based at our Heathrow Hangar and in our Operations Control Centre and their main purpose is to keep our fleet of aircraft in fantastic condition. This involves managing and controlling thousands of maintenance tasks on our aircraft, including when and how we should do this.


Posted by PalletJack
LA by birth, TX by choice
Member since Oct 2024
904 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 12:23 pm to
Reminds me of my dad’s favorite joke.
I was trying to swim across the lake but halfway there I got tired and swam back
Posted by MSUDawg98
Ravens Flock
Member since Jan 2018
12376 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Taking a guess they called their airline / messaged them, and were told the likely repair would be far cheaper if they turned around and did it in the UK.
This can easily be confirmed by looking at the 9/11 decisions. Most inbound transatlantic flights were diverted to New Brunswick and Montreal. BUT I suspect the decision to turnaround and inconvenience everyone was a decision made months/years/decades ago. It would've been much easier to continue on to the US and get the repairs here rather than turning back and having to use another flight to get everyone here.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
4477 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Taking a guess they called their airline / messaged them, and were told the likely repair would be far cheaper if they turned around and did it in the UK.


If it can land, it can take back off empty and fly home.

It cruises at 580+, so it was roughly 40 min out of NY.

There is no tactical advantage to turning around FULL of passengers and cargo. And the safety risk of passengers was raised exponentially.

Unless NY told them they weren't allowed, the move made no sense
Posted by cattus
Member since Jan 2009
15356 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 1:13 pm to
What kind of compensation could one expect from this?

I understand the expense reasoning if there were repairs needed but it must have been a lot to offset all the fuel and pay and compensation to everyone on board. It still doesn't make sense to me, inquiring minds need to know!
Posted by XenScott
Pensacola
Member since Oct 2016
4008 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 2:17 pm to
There has to be more to this. Maybe it was an issue that they weee afraid for others to see for some reason.
Posted by Woolfpack
Member since Jun 2021
1483 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 2:28 pm to
Im guessing its an issue of being safe to fly but policy would not allow for it to take off.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

If it had crashed, would the payout per dead passenger have been less in the UK than in New York?

Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71643 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Should have landed in Newfoundland I could have taken those baws out on the town

You in Gander? Those folks have experience with taking care of air travelers who unexpectedly Come From Away.
Posted by 0x15E
Outer Space
Member since Sep 2020
14735 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

the move made no sense


It all boils down to the company bottom line
Posted by Crow Pie
Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center
Member since Feb 2010
27147 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

A350 landing at Manchester with its landing-gear doors open — a sign of a problem with the plane's hydraulics.
Is it just me or doesn't everyone want the landing gear doors open at time of landing?
Posted by BHM
Member since Jun 2012
3852 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 3:43 pm to
Some aircraft doors close back after the landing gear is extended.

Just confirmed that the A 350 is one. See video.

Youtube
This post was edited on 3/9/25 at 3:49 pm
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
72793 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Those folks have experience with taking care of air travelers who unexpectedly Come From Away.
Some nice stories (honestly) about those Gander folk taking care of folks who ended up there.

Posted by Crow Pie
Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center
Member since Feb 2010
27147 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Some aircraft doors close back after the landing gear is extended.
Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
58622 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 4:38 pm to
Definitely sounds like the pilot's wife found out he was cheating and was waiting in New York. Ole baw said hell no and went back across the pond.



Only explanation
Posted by Lou Loomis
A pond. Ponds good for you.
Member since Mar 2025
1170 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 6:23 pm to
Those planes cost tens of thousands per hour to operate while in the air. I doubt they turned around because the repair in England was going to save them 150 bucks. Additionally, now they have to compensate/replane their passengers which will negate the fees they paid to be on that flight. This isn’t calling around to see who has the best price on tires. The facilities in the states would be equipped to take care of any issue they had.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61276 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Those planes cost tens of thousands per hour to operate while in the air. I doubt they turned around because the repair in England was going to save them 150 bucks.


And think about how much the fuel cost that they wasted.
Posted by choppadocta
Louisiana
Member since May 2014
2407 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 6:59 pm to
FAA-certified mechanics and foreign aircraft:
If you have an FAA Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) mechanic certificate, you can work on aircraft registered in the United States (N-registered aircraft) anywhere in the world.
Working on foreign-registered aircraft:
To work on aircraft registered in other countries (not N-registered), you'll need to obtain the relevant certifications from the aviation authority of that country (e.g., EASA, CASA, or CAA).

Just another possible reason of the thinking that they would have to bring mechanics parts etc into a US or Canadian maintenance base
Posted by holmesbr
Baton Rouge, La.
Member since Feb 2012
3898 posts
Posted on 3/9/25 at 7:02 pm to
Is the a350 the big airbus? It may not have had certified mechanics for it here in the US or space to keep it. Kind of like the dreamliner can't fit at just any jetway.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram