- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/18/22 at 4:53 pm to BugAC
People of Baton Rouge need to go back to old school public death penalty.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 4:54 pm to Indefatigable
Adams is definitely against it as well, and she went into the first public meeting leaning “for”.
This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 10/18/22 at 4:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
I know exactly what it means. It’s common in Schizos. Your posts are all over the place. You go from one side to the other……like a schizo. Oh and that laughter emoji is a sign of being a weak minded individual. And thanks for making my point on your very next post,
Posted on 10/18/22 at 4:56 pm to LSUBadger
quote:
You should have listed half truth as one of you possible scenarios earlier
I literally listed the scenario that appears to be the truth
Posted on 10/18/22 at 4:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Nah, apparently not anymore.
I literally listed the scenario that appears to be the truth
quote:The argument of “we said there was an NDA having to do with the stormwater proposal but the NDA had nothing to do with the stormwater proposal…but we did sign an NDA regarding something else, therefore we weren’t fully lying” doesn’t work anymore.
Mayor Broome’s office has issued a statement in response now : “There is no NDA regarding the stormwater proposal. There is an NDA with the Parish Attorney concerning our conversations with the Justice Department regarding our MS4 audit
There is no half truth anymore.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
Except you suggested that maybe they “had” to sign it with the consulting firm. To me, it looks like they made up a false requirement to sign it only to suppress information and protect themselves and this bullsh&t plan from public scrutiny, even going so far as to lie to the metro council and pressure them to sign one as well, saying it was mandated by the feds, which has been revealed to be a complete fabrication.
You could say your scenario was half-true
You could say your scenario was half-true
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
And it appears you were wrong. The in house NDA was evidently about a separate issue.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:03 pm to kingbob
quote:
Except you suggested that maybe they “had” to sign it with the consulting firm.
No the implication was that it was a rude to have an NDA but not one force by the federal government.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Except the whole thing was they represented it as the feds forcing them to sign it. I know, because I personally pressed their spokesman on it at one of the meetings, and he doubled down that it was a DOJ requirement. They lied…bigly.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:16 pm to kingbob
quote:
They lied…bigly.
This.
First council person to call them out wins a lifetime of support from the OT Lounge.
Your move.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:16 pm to kingbob
Lmao! Graves was just on channel Two calling out the Lying Broome Handle in a respectful way.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:16 pm to Scruffy
quote:
The argument of “we said there was an NDA having to do with the stormwater proposal
Nope. From the WAFB article:
quote:
WAFB has confirmed that everyone in the administration involved in the negotiations with the DOJ and the EPA, has had to sign a non-disclosure agreement.
They didn't say what you said.
Like I said earlier, they were using intentionally crafty language.
They only said admin members had to sign a NDA agreement. They didn't say with whom or that it was about the stormwater proposal.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:18 pm to kingbob
quote:
Except the whole thing was they represented it as the feds forcing them to sign it.
Why I said it was a half truth
Here is a post of mine from page 6
quote:
The wording seems to be pretty careful.
Party A has signed an NDA....but it doesn't specifically say with whom.
The reason why dumbass saying I was arguing Broome was "innocent" with one of my options was hilarious, because her admin orchestrating unnecessary NDAs (and not with fedgov) would be so much worse than signing NDAs forced on them by fedgov.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/30/25 at 10:11 am
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:23 pm to lnomm34
I point blank asked their spokesperson “Why would a public entity need an NDA to negotiate with another public entity?”
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:25 pm to jbgleason
HNTB Corporation
CEO:
Robert Slimp
Slimp's linkedin page says he is in an organization called Accelerator for America founded by Los Angeles mayor Eric Garcetti.
Looks like they were trying to make BR more like LA?
CEO:
Robert Slimp
Slimp's linkedin page says he is in an organization called Accelerator for America founded by Los Angeles mayor Eric Garcetti.
Looks like they were trying to make BR more like LA?
This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:28 pm to kingbob
quote:
Adams is definitely against it as well,
Good. I sent her an email.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:29 pm to BugAC
The fricking bitch and her lackeys just blatantly lied. All of this discussion about various other agreements and issues is just the smokescreen they created to cover her arse.
She lied without any reservations.
She lied without any reservations.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 5:31 pm to lnomm34
This whole issue should really be an eye opener for folks in EBR.
While this board likes to make fun of New Orleans and Teedy and her blatant in your face misspending of money, Broome has made it a habit to hide this type of action repeatedly.
Also, the interview with Garret Graves shown on WBRZ at 5pm exposed another issue that voters should be more aware of: there are grants available that would potentially negate the need in its entirety for taxpayers to be required to foot any part of the bill. Plus it isn’t a storm water issue as much as a pollution issue.
Similar to other occasions, Broome has consistently avoided federal grants, either outright ignoring them, or missing deadlines. A cynic would think this is because she doesn’t want to have to be put under the scrutiny of federal oversight of a grant compliance.
While this board likes to make fun of New Orleans and Teedy and her blatant in your face misspending of money, Broome has made it a habit to hide this type of action repeatedly.
Also, the interview with Garret Graves shown on WBRZ at 5pm exposed another issue that voters should be more aware of: there are grants available that would potentially negate the need in its entirety for taxpayers to be required to foot any part of the bill. Plus it isn’t a storm water issue as much as a pollution issue.
Similar to other occasions, Broome has consistently avoided federal grants, either outright ignoring them, or missing deadlines. A cynic would think this is because she doesn’t want to have to be put under the scrutiny of federal oversight of a grant compliance.
Page 9 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News