- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: EPA claims no knowledge of Mayor Broome’s stormwater utility fee NDA
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:19 pm to doubleb
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:19 pm to doubleb
It implied that but only indicated that the admin officials involved in the discussion signed A NDA, but without any specifics given. Seems clear the admin (or the agency it contracted with) required the NDA and not the EPA.
They tried to tell a half truth and the coordinated media promoted the ruse. Now the truth was revealed and they look like lying assholes.
They tried to tell a half truth and the coordinated media promoted the ruse. Now the truth was revealed and they look like lying assholes.
1
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Where did it say the EPA required an NDA?
That was the entire reasoning given why they couldn't share info.
They said city officials were "asked" to signed an NDA. they said feds wanted to keep it "tight lipped". They then said "everyone" involved had to sign an NDA. HAD TO. What reasonable person would assume they weren't talking about the feds?
These were reasons given why they couldn't discuss and any idiot that understands human language could understand what they were saying. Most people have the ability to understand how one sentence may reference another sentence instead of treating each sentence like context-less islands.
The title of the WAFB article explicitly states that the feds asked city officials to sign NDAs, for frick's sake. Now you know why.
I mean, you're being dense enough to where there's no point moving forward with this conversation. Why don't you just move along?
This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They never said who the NDA was signed with. The article doesn't say the EPA required an NDA. It just implies it, for obvious reasons.
"City officials asked to sign NDAs from the Federal Government...."
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:25 pm to BeepNode
Beep Node, the WAFB headline you posted clearly states that C-P officials signed a NDA with the federal government.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:27 pm to doubleb
quote:
Beep Node, the WAFB headline you posted clearly states that C-P officials signed a NDA with the federal government.
I know that. SFP has already stated that headlines don't matter. There's really no point in continuing forward with him.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:28 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
"City officials asked to sign NDAs from the Federal Government...."
"EPA claims no knowledge of Mayor Broome’s stormwater utility fee NDA"
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:29 pm to BeepNode
quote:
know that. SFP has already stated that headlines don't matter. There's really no point in continuing forward with him.
Really???? That’s incredibly dumb to say that.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:31 pm to doubleb
quote:
Really???? That’s incredibly dumb to say that.
The article in OP literally has just as misleading of a title.
The actual reporting is within the article.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You're hopeless, but you're consistent with it. I will give you that.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The article in OP literally has just as misleading of a title.
Not discussing OP. Discussing WAFB carrying the mayor’s water for her. It’s a clear misrepresentation of the truth.
At best WAFB is guilty of trusting the administration, and st worst complicit in this fraud against EBR citizens.
Thankfully Rep. Graves went the extra mile to get the record straight and KC followed it up.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:39 pm to doubleb
quote:
At best WAFB is guilty of trusting the administration
No. that ship sailed.
The headline says the feds got them to sign the NDA.
In the article it says they CONFIRMED that everyone involved signed NDAs. So what exactly did they confirm?
Confirming isn't just taking somebody's word for it.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:42 pm to doubleb
These lying assholes.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:55 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
You're hopeless, but you're consistent with it. I will give you that.
these are the semantics I love about his argument
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
“Look” like lying assholes?
This implies that they aren’t actually lying assholes. They are and got caught, bigly.
This implies that they aren’t actually lying assholes. They are and got caught, bigly.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:58 pm to BeepNode
Duhe is the stupid douche who was pushing the article about how the media perception of BR is preventing business from moving here.
You know, as opposed to the frickING CRIME STATISTICS that any business should be taking into account before moving here.
You know, as opposed to the frickING CRIME STATISTICS that any business should be taking into account before moving here.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:59 pm to whoa
She did an outstanding job of throwing the parish attorney under the bus.
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:01 pm to lsufan1971
quote:
Mayor's office asks to remove Stormwater Utility Fee from Metro Council agenda amid NDA miscommunication
Miscommunication my arse
Also, how much does more SWB despise Kiran now?
This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:02 pm to lsufan1971
We're
All
For
Broome
All
For
Broome
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:08 pm to lsufan1971
quote:
She did an outstanding job of throwing the parish attorney under the bus.
Advocate article 9/26
quote:
At the meeting, Hill and Parish Attorney Andy Dotson declined to provide more information on the need to quickly approve the proposal, pointing to a non-disclosure agreement signed by city-parish officials who are taking part in negotiations with federal regulators.
Based on this it sounds like he lied to the council
If that’s the case he needs to lose his job
Page 12 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News