- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ensminger Jr. filing lawsuit for Carley McCord’s death
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:29 am to Elleshoe
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:29 am to Elleshoe
quote:No, since we're being ridiculous apparently, the equivalent would be an earthquake weakened the floorboard at picadilly and my wife stepped through it and incurred injury a second after the event.
Sure it is.. a wrongful or negligent act harming another. That is what you’re covered for. When you mess up, even if you didn’t necessarily intend to harm someone else.
quote:And if it prevails it disproves your original stayement.
He raised a defense. Maybe it prevails and maybe it doesn’t
This post was edited on 5/16/20 at 8:32 am
1
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:29 am to Janky
quote:it is
because that is an adequate comparison.
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:29 am to NIH
Maybe not but it’s a start. You and boozie, I’ll pray that you find peace in these trying times.
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:31 am to Elleshoe
Love the “99% of lawsuits are frivolous” crowd. They’re all frivolous until someone someone rear ends them and then they’re gunning for policy limits because the insurance company refused to pay for their total costs of repair.
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:33 am to Dixie Normus
quote:I've been hit in four car accidents and never sued.
Love the “99% of lawsuits are frivolous” crowd. They’re all frivolous until someone someone rear ends them and then they’re gunning for policy limits because the insurance company refused to pay for their total costs of repair
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:33 am to Jake88
quote:
No, since we're being ridiculous apparently, the equivalent would be an earthquake weakened the floorboard at picadilly and my wife stepped through it and incurred injury a second after the event.
No, since you’re at the wheel of your car and there’s not a person holding the floorboard of Piccadilly.
quote:
And if it prevails it disproves your original stayement.
No, your swerve is still an intentional act that caused someone harm. It’s potentially excused by the sudden emergency doctrine. That doesn’t make it an accident
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:35 am to Jake88
Did you make claims on the other guys insurance?
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:37 am to Jake88
Everyone Sue's now, just wait until the Covid-19 lawsuits start popping up. Who do they sue? The government for opening up, businesses they visited? Friends/family who may have infected them
We already see employees file lawsuits saying their health is at risk in order to not go back to work.
We already see employees file lawsuits saying their health is at risk in order to not go back to work.
This post was edited on 5/16/20 at 8:39 am
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:39 am to boosiebadazz
quote:You not going to make the point you think you are. The incidents were not like my earlier hypothetical and you are not lumping me in with the 99% of suits are frivolous.
Did you make claims on the other guys insurance
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:41 am to Elleshoe
quote:You're dug in. No point in going forward.
It’s potentially excused by the sudden emergency doctrine. That doesn’t make it an accident
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:43 am to tduecen
Proving causation for that is impossible
The actual scientists don’t even really know how easily it spreads just yet
The actual scientists don’t even really know how easily it spreads just yet
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:43 am to Jake88
quote:
You not going to make the point you think you are. The incidents were not like my earlier hypothetical and you are not lumping me in with the 99% of suits are frivolous.
so that’s a yesPosted on 5/16/20 at 8:44 am to In The Know
I don’t practice in Louisiana.
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:45 am to tigerskin
First we kill all the lawyers, then procurement, then HR
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:47 am to boosiebadazz
Of course. Still not going to make your point. I'm not arguing that there is never fault that can be assigned in auto accidents.
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:49 am to ecb
quote:
First we make a roux, then we kill all the lawyers, then procurement, then HR
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:50 am to Jake88
I’m glad your property damage and your bodily injury claim was settled within the year. Luckily for you you didn’t have injuries which necessitated long-lasting treatment forcing you to file suit to protect your rights in Louisiana before a year.
Or that you didn’t have a preexisting injury made worse and the insurance company denied your claim outright forcing you to sue to prove your case.
You must have a lucky rabbits foot with you up on that high horse of righteousness. I wish we were all that fortunate.
Or that you didn’t have a preexisting injury made worse and the insurance company denied your claim outright forcing you to sue to prove your case.
You must have a lucky rabbits foot with you up on that high horse of righteousness. I wish we were all that fortunate.
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:50 am to tduecen
Covid liability cases are a no-go to me; you can't prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it is more likely than not you caught the virus at the restaurant, etc. You could have caught it practically anywhere.
Maybe if EVERYONE in the restaurant came down with Covid at the same time...
Maybe if EVERYONE in the restaurant came down with Covid at the same time...
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:51 am to Pedro
quote:
This could be something to help cover funeral costs and such
Posted on 5/16/20 at 8:52 am to Klingler7
quote:
have worked in aviation weather for the FAA for 25 years. One correction to an earlier post: visibility was 1/4 SM as measured by an automated weather observing system. FAA tower did not augment the METAR observation.
Also, the ceiling was not OVC002. Rather it was VV002. Overcast defines a layer 200 feet AGL. vertical visibility VV was 200 feet from ground level into the atmosphere. VV is the highest level you can see into the sky when Dense fog FG is present. Distinct difference.
Translation?
Page 13 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News