- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you think human giants ever roamed this earth?
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:35 am to Lickitty Split
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:35 am to Lickitty Split
We are them.
The bunch we wiped out were all smaller than pigmies…
The bunch we wiped out were all smaller than pigmies…
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:35 am to Methedup77
quote:
Peace would equal death no? Just a euphemistic way of praying for death
I can’t portray my beliefs to you accurately in this forum. So I will just let it go. You can live in peace and die in peace. I pray that you may find it
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:38 am to DaBeerz
Thanks but you don’t have to pray for that. I’m already at peace
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:44 am to DaBeerz
Can you pray I run into 1million dollars? I feel you’re on a roll and hate to mess up your streak
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:46 am to Lickitty Split
Definitely. Look up Sardinia, Italy, an island off the coast of Italy. They were the offspring of the Watchers and women. Read Enoch 1. Usually, wherever there are Earthen mounds, there are giant bones buried underneath.
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:51 am to Solo Cam
quote:Not really sure why when the same book says both are true
Same dudes will believe Moses split the Red Sea with his staff but will make fun of the idea that there was some oversized humanoid.
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I just chalk it up to evidence of how the Bible is an allegory and not a historical document.
I used to share this perspective, but over time, I’ve been increasingly convinced of the historical accuracy of the Bible. Archaeological discoveries consistently confirm details about the events and accounts of the Israelite nation. Additionally, studying textual variations and older manuscripts, such as those describing Goliath’s height, has only deepened my belief that these stories are rooted in actual history rather than purely allegory.
This is why I find it fascinating that David is perceived as the underdog by everyone except himself. Did no one consider using a sling as a weapon in one-on-one combat before this encounter? David seemed fully aware of how one-sided the duel would be. While his immense confidence could be attributed to his faith in God, this confidence isn’t as apparent in later accounts, where he doesn’t assume everything will simply work out. In this instance, his confidence seems grounded in his understanding of the tactical advantage he held, bringing a gun to a knife fight while no one else realized it. It’s almost as if David discovered the power of the sling for single combat entirely on his own.
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:56 am to Pelican fan99
Fascinating topic.
I'm no expert and not even remotely read up on the subject. However "giants" are mentioned in nearly EVERY ancient text and depicted in ancient art and carvings; same as "aliens" in cave drawings. Hell, they're even depicted in the pyramids.
How were the pyramids build. Such massive structures erected with only the crudest of methods and sheer man power available at the time. It's mind boggling to think that "man" could have done that.
Definitely some rabbit holes in here that I'll be exploring.
I'm no expert and not even remotely read up on the subject. However "giants" are mentioned in nearly EVERY ancient text and depicted in ancient art and carvings; same as "aliens" in cave drawings. Hell, they're even depicted in the pyramids.
How were the pyramids build. Such massive structures erected with only the crudest of methods and sheer man power available at the time. It's mind boggling to think that "man" could have done that.
Definitely some rabbit holes in here that I'll be exploring.
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:57 am to 87PurpleandGold
quote:
Usually, wherever there are Earthen mounds, there are giant bones buried underneath.
So people tailgate by giant bones at LSU?
Posted on 12/29/24 at 8:58 am to cssamerican
quote:
What’s fascinating about the story is that David essentially brought a gun to a knife fight, yet everyone else saw him as the underdog. From a historical perspective, it’s intriguing, did people not recognize the devastating power of a sling at the time?
Slings have been around for tens of thousands of years but they aren't close combat weapons. One also wouldn't do well, generally, against an armored foe like Goliath if that was your only weapon.
Posted on 12/29/24 at 9:03 am to bamarep
quote:Not really. From one pyramid to the next researchers have seen how the Egyptians improved each time.
How were the pyramids build. Such massive structures erected with only the crudest of methods and sheer man power available at the time. It's mind boggling to think that "man" could have done that
Posted on 12/29/24 at 9:06 am to cssamerican
quote:
I’ve been increasingly convinced of the historical accuracy of the Bible. Archaeological discoveries consistently confirm details about the events and accounts of the Israelite nation.
The Bible has accounts of actual history as it was written after these events occurred, for sure. I've posted certain Bible-based books are actually good primers for Bronze Age history before. There was one I found in Walmart once that was really good for maps and the various civilizations of the Old Testament time periods.
However, this doesn't mean the exact storylines of the Bible are historical accounts.
Like, was some battle between an Israelite with a sling and a larger Philistine resolved via single combat? Possibly.
Did this occur as written in the Bible? Unlikely. It was likely a legend of the time co-opted later with Judaism spread about it. Which also raises the question of the original legend itself, as single combat was more of an archetype of those Bronze Aged legends without as much historical support. For instance, there is a very similar story in the earlier Iliad between Nestor and Ereuthalion. It even has the whole "worthiness of the underdog" storyline to show the rightful heir to the throne.
Posted on 12/29/24 at 9:10 am to bamarep
quote:
I'm no expert and not even remotely read up on the subject. However "giants" are mentioned in nearly EVERY ancient text and depicted in ancient art and carvings; same as "aliens" in cave drawings. Hell, they're even depicted in the pyramids.
And, yet, it's still not physically possible.
Dragons are also a common meme. Doesn't mean they exist (outside of things like alligators/crocs).
Posted on 12/29/24 at 9:15 am to Methedup77
quote:
Can you pray I run into 1million dollars? I feel you’re on a roll and hate to mess up your streak
I will pray that you are maxing an IRA and 401k, investing monthly from your paychecks… in 20-30 years you will have 1 million dollars, or sooner depending on your income. You do have free will to make bad choices though or corrupt by evil
This post was edited on 12/29/24 at 9:18 am
Posted on 12/29/24 at 9:17 am to Lickitty Split
Yes:


This post was edited on 12/29/24 at 9:18 am
Posted on 12/29/24 at 9:20 am to Lickitty Split
Giants roamed the Earth, but they were not humans.
Posted on 12/29/24 at 9:27 am to DaBeerz
Dude just stop.
Stop responding to him. He's mucking up the thread & your helping.
Stop responding to him. He's mucking up the thread & your helping.
Posted on 12/29/24 at 9:35 am to Lickitty Split
You need to define “giants”. Not sure what the average male height was in 500 BC, but assume it was probably 5’5” or less. A giant might have been someone that was 6’5” or more.
If you are thinking 10’ tall, you start running into physiological reasons that make it extremely unlikely.
If you are thinking 10’ tall, you start running into physiological reasons that make it extremely unlikely.
Posted on 12/29/24 at 9:39 am to Columbia
quote:
No. But we aren’t really looking either.
I mean we have literal warehouses and warehouses full of dinosaur bones and other fossils from millions of years ago.
How would we miss these giants from only 10,000 or so years ago? Seems unlikely.
I'm of full belief that we don't know shite about this world and there are endless things that we are either wrong about or don't know yet. But I'm not sure if I'm convinced based on simply "there are ancient texts talking about them and we just aren't looking".
Popular
Back to top


0








