Started By
Message

re: Do you consider a 1000% price change increase over a 20 year period reasonable?

Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:58 pm to
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
34097 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:58 pm to
TOPS, and other state programs like it, have removed any incentive for the idiots that run colleges to at least attempt to control costs.

And now, if you have a pulse, you can get into LSU.


Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16702 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 4:25 pm to





So everything that the Gov't has their tentacles in have increased wildly versus other products.

Great
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
7134 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 4:29 pm to
When I was at Auburn 30 years ago, it was about $6k per year. I’d take a check for $1500 to the bursar’s office.

My oldest had his visit there, and it’s an affordable $35k for the same thing.

Oh yeah, I paid $350/month in rent, and it’s about 4x that now to share a place.

Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
60604 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

rintintin


Not a bad visual, but I have to question the new car part of that.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23328 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 5:38 pm to
A lot of degrees should just be trade school. I worked in medical labs 40 years. Took 15 hours of chemistry. Very difficult courses. The first year of med teching in a hospital, I had too make up a 0.5 molar solution of HCl. I thought, yeah I'm using my chemistry. Making molar solutions is probably the first thing you use in the first chemistry class you take.

The remaining years I never used a single concept I learned in chemistry. And I worked in the chem department the last 4 years.

Point being, all I used could have been learned in one year.

BUT, the opposing thought is you really don't want a bunch of people working in a medical lab that are not pretty smart. I've worked in an overall "dumb" lab(short time) and the patient results did suffer a great deal.
This post was edited on 4/11/25 at 5:40 pm
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
29579 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

BUT, the opposing thought is you really don't want a bunch of people working in a medical lab that are not pretty smart. I've worked in an overall "dumb" lab(short time) and the patient results did suffer a great deal.


You refuted your own argument in the same post. Well done
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
8372 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

Programs like TOPS were designed for lower income families,
sure about that?
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
11948 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 5:44 pm to
I make LOTS of money for a hospital and for some reason my pay doesn't match that trajectory.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23328 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 5:52 pm to
Yep, I know, its working towards supervisors being in charge of depts having their degrees and workers not having degrees. Guess its a compromise. Its when the supervisors fail or don't care you find serious problems.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
130027 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 5:53 pm to
Gotta pay for that dei somehow
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
29579 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Yep, I know, its working towards supervisors being in charge of depts having their degrees and workers not having degrees.


How do you be a supervisor without being a worker first?
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23328 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 5:56 pm to
Nowadays it’s a degree that makes a difference.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
22366 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 6:17 pm to
The 1984 tuition was $295/semester. An air conditioned dorm was $625/semester. A 15-meal plan was $450/semester. Parking was $15/semester. Registration fee was $10.

So for about $1,400 you were in for a semester.
Posted by AlextheBodacious
Member since Oct 2020
2453 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

And now, if you have a pulse, you can get into LSU.

Did you need a pulse to get in before tops?
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
22366 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Did you need a pulse to get in before tops?


Before 1987 all you needed to get in was a high school diploma (or GED) and to take the ACT or SAT. You didn't need any particular ACT or SAT score - you just needed to take it.

The course book had pages and pages of remedial English and Math courses. It looked like they had hundreds of sections at every available time slot.

After 1987, they put in a core curriculum requirement and an ACT score minimum.
This post was edited on 4/11/25 at 8:15 pm
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
70894 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:28 pm to
I remember it being $1280 a semester base tuition in 1998.
Posted by tigergirl10
Member since Jul 2019
10399 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

TOPS is objectively a welfare program
How so? It’s strictly based on academic performance and nothing else.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram