Started By
Message

re: Do you consider a 1000% price change increase over a 20 year period reasonable?

Posted on 4/11/25 at 12:22 pm to
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
29579 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

A ChemE major doesn’t need to be forced to take psychology and Greek philosophy.


They aren’t
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
19762 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Need to scale back the hours of required fluff classes.


Agree and disagree.

If college is just a gatekeeper for higher paying jobs and it costs a frickload of money to get through the gate, then yes, get rid of any survey and elective courses.

But college shouldn’t be about job training. Students should be getting a well rounded, HIGHER education. They’re supposed to be well read, well versed, and well studied across a wide array of subjects that provide them the opportunity to be productive citizens in a society. That SHOULD require a rigorous admissions process to minimize unqualified students from attending. And it shouldn’t cost an arm and a leg to be there.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
29579 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

But college shouldn’t be about job training. Students should be getting a well rounded, HIGHER education. They’re supposed to be well read, well versed, and well studied across a wide array of subjects that provide them the opportunity to be productive citizens in a society. That SHOULD require a rigorous admissions process to minimize unqualified students from attending. And it shouldn’t cost an arm and a leg to be there.


Job skills aren’t very hard to acquire. Learning how to think is hard, and that is what we should be teaching in higher education. Going to a vocational model is a terrible idea
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24809 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

They aren’t


Not those specific course. Was giving examples.

24-25 LSU catalog, if I’m looking at it correctly, requires 9 hours of Humanities classes, 3 in Arts and 3 in Social Sciences.
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7623 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 12:45 pm to
My daughter wants to be an elementary school teacher. The financial reality doesn’t make any sense. The cost of a college degree, combined with lost wages during study, will take decades to recover through a teacher’s salary.

We got to lower education costs, explore alternatives to four-year degrees like streamlined certifications, or significantly raise teacher pay to make the profession financially sustainable.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
15988 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

24-25 LSU catalog, if I’m looking at it correctly, requires 9 hours of Humanities classes, 3 in Arts and 3 in Social Sciences.

That's not much. Especially since many engineering majors probably need a little GPA boost.
9 hours humanities : History and/or a Foreign Language
Arts: Popular option is Music Appreciation freshman year for an easy A
Social Sciences: Geography 1001 or 1003. Another easy freshman year A.

eta: If Honors College, then most of the HNRS classes also count as humanities.
This post was edited on 4/11/25 at 1:06 pm
Posted by 8lue
Member since Jan 2014
356 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:29 pm to
Almost like there was a program designed by the government to help kids go to college in state. Not join the reserves for free instate tuition or anything like that. Something else...... I wonder when TOPS started in relation to this price excitement......LOL
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
117312 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

A ChemE major doesn’t need to be forced to take psychology and Greek philosophy.


It can be taken as an elective, but there isn't an engineering curriculum that forces students to take those classes.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
9995 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

significantly raise teacher pay to make the profession financially sustainable.


Teaching is an Mrs. degree. They get paid about what they're worth. No offense, of course. There shouldn't be "teaching" degrees to begin with. You want to teach English? Get an English/Lit degree, and take a class or two on classroom management. But the unions won't allow that, they need to make sure that teachers essentially have no marketable skills other than teaching, so they're mostly trapped in the system.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6910 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Students should be getting a well rounded, HIGHER education.


That is what high school is for.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
29579 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

That is what high school is for.


No it’s not
Posted by DakIsNoLB
Member since Sep 2015
1031 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 2:05 pm to
1. Loans are the problem regardless of the lender. Neither the Fed nor private lenders do anything to underwrite these loans. Start basing it on high school performance and intended major, and then only continue to lend if satisfactory academic progress is being made (3.0 or higher). The difficulty of getting a student loan should be in the ballpark of a business loan or a mortgage.

2. Text books are the biggest scam. Zero reason they need to release multiple editions. My calculus book was 4th edition when I was in college. It's on the 9th edition now. Calculus has not changed in decades. The structural mechanics book I used is on it's 11th edition. Not enough has changed their to be of any value.

3. The stop the notion our kids must have a college degree. Lot's of useless degrees out there. We've essentially stigmatized kids not going to college, and a lot of the jobs these kids end up having nothing to do with education they supposedly received. I say supposedly because...

4. College should be difficult and it's time to start weeding the kids out that clearly aren't learning to think and are skating by. It's a waste of time and money.

None of this will happen unless we see the bubble burst.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
19762 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

That is what high school is for.


Oh yes. I forgot about the OT's high respect for public school teachers and their ability to disseminate knowledge across a wide array of nuanced topics.
Posted by DakIsNoLB
Member since Sep 2015
1031 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Agree and disagree.

If college is just a gatekeeper for higher paying jobs and it costs a frickload of money to get through the gate, then yes, get rid of any survey and elective courses.

But college shouldn’t be about job training. Students should be getting a well rounded, HIGHER education. They’re supposed to be well read, well versed, and well studied across a wide array of subjects that provide them the opportunity to be productive citizens in a society. That SHOULD require a rigorous admissions process to minimize unqualified students from attending. And it shouldn’t cost an arm and a leg to be there.


Mostly agree, but what do you mean by wide array? My civil engineering curriculum at the time required 6 hours humanities, 6 hours social sciences, and 3 hours fine arts. English I and II, Chemistry I & II, Physics I - III, Calculus I-IV, and public speaking made up the prerequisite stuff. Everything else was directly applicable to the major and became more focused the closer to graduation. Out of 133 credit hours, that's 15 elective, 36 prereq, and the rest major focused.

I thought that was pretty good balance. Curious if this is what you're talking about.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
24809 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

It can be taken as an elective, but there isn't an engineering curriculum that forces students to take those classes.


Well aware, see above. Was giving two examples of the types of classes they do have to take as part of the curriculum.

I'm currently writing the tuition checks for a ChemE major.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
70016 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:06 pm to
I had Saints season tickets starting in the 2006 Season.

They went from $500.00 per seat to $1,750.00 per seat (this upcoming year) in that time for the exact same seats.

The BLS site says adjusted for inflation they should be $800.00 each today vs over twice that.



(Happy Ending: I did not renew)

Posted by MattA
Member since Nov 2019
1895 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:17 pm to
Hope my kids like the juco route. About half the cost of my old school.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
21387 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

This is what happens when "everyone" needs a degree for every basic job


Which has also decreased the value of the degree, so the ROI has gone to complete shite.
Posted by AlextheBodacious
Member since Oct 2020
2453 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

TOPS is objectively a welfare program

How is it a welfare program? It’s available to anyone regardless of income and is merit based. Welfare would be free only to poors regardless of their ability to learn.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
29579 posts
Posted on 4/11/25 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

It’s available to anyone regardless of income and is merit based.


Getting a 20 on the ACT is hardly merit based. Look I used it…. And subsequently shipped off out of state upon graduation, putting no tax dollars back in the state that paid my college tuition. Objectively a bad deal for the state, and that is the most common outcome for higher performing students from Louisiana
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram