- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:00 pm to Rebel
The prosecution is saying " we are mad at you because you blew up our whole case" by his actions.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:04 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
The prosecution is saying " we are mad at you because you blew up our whole case" by his actions.
Exactly. Asking everything as "yes or no" and not letting him expound on his response is showing they don't want him to actually give his medical opinion. Which I get, he can hurt their case, but it's also very plain and doesn't come across well.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:04 pm to SOSFAN
The prosecution is just trying to pick apart anything they think they can to create doubt about this witnesses testimony. He blew up their case on direct, so they don’t have anything to lose by alienating the jury at this point.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:06 pm to Abraham H Parnassis
One good thing about illegal drugs; they do end up taking out the trash sooner or later.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:06 pm to Wiseguy
quote:
The prosecution is just trying to pick apart anything they think they can to create doubt about this witnesses testimony. He
Oh I know thats what they are trying but its backfiring.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:10 pm to SOSFAN
When he knew their were two twin exhaust and the make and model of the police car, the prosecution knew they fricked up.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:12 pm to September 1948
quote:
One good thing about illegal drugs; they do end up taking out the trash sooner or later.
So do "Legal" drugs
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:14 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
Oh I know thats what they are trying but its backfiring.
My point was that it’s their only play because this witness blew holes all in the prosecution’s case, so they have to take the chance.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:14 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
Oh I know thats what they are trying but its backfiring.
What does Nelson do in the re-direct?
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:15 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
What does Nelson do in the re-direct?
Goes back and asks some of the same questions and allows the witness to give full, nuanced answers
.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:16 pm to tgrbaitn08
the jury knows there was never a time when you had several officer on Floyds back and torso - so prosecutors aren't getting anywhere with this line
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:16 pm to tgrbaitn08
Did you say the exact weight references in this answer? He must be lying then because he said that today.
Well, no he didn't say an exact weight I said "weight of several officers" which clearly means less than 200 pounds because all police weigh less than 100 pounds.
Well, no he didn't say an exact weight I said "weight of several officers" which clearly means less than 200 pounds because all police weigh less than 100 pounds.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:18 pm to hubreb
Dr Fowler getting a little agitated.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:19 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
It is an interesting exchange. I don't think he is hurting their position, as much is he is making them look like they are stretching their arguments and picking and choosing points they like
hes showing that the defense is simply obfuscating facts by citing studies that did not account for similar circumstances such as the additional restraints and for extended duration. they also left out portions of those studies that acknowledge the danger when those additional restraints are applied.
carbon monoxide defense cant be proven and there are no findings to support such on autopsy. defense reaching for straws.
that the fatal arrhythmia is a duh statement because thats how nearly everyone dies, and this is not a defense as the asphyxia would cause it.
the bought and paid for 'expert' testimony for the defense is falling apart.
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:19 pm to SOSFAN
AMS off crying in the corner?
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:21 pm to roadGator
"It's not your oxygen reserve"
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:21 pm to hnds2th
quote:
Dr Fowler getting a little agitated.
He's clearly a person who understands there are no yes or no answers. Everything has caveats and explanations.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:22 pm to roadGator
I think the judge having to stop the prosecutor 3 times isn't a good look
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:24 pm to jlovel7
quote:
He's clearly a person who understands there are no yes or no answers. Everything has caveats and explanations.
why would he get frustrated by that unless he were biased in his opinion? yes or no shouldnt offend a neutral interpretation
Page 378 of 524
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News