re: Deputies arrest 4 in LSU student Madison Brooks case

It was talked about from a few different angles. First, just like you said that it sounds like he knew she was out of it and wanted to make absolutely sure she wouldn’t put up a fight. Second, I think it came from Carver’s statement. He probably told the story to the investigators over and over until they got everything they needed. And it contradicts Angel who said she was the one basically asking for consent to put it nicely.

(no message)

quote:

---

He wasn’t told this. He saw it. That’s kind of an important difference yes?

---

I don’t know what he saw and neither do you.

And I have no issues with you giving your opinions or theories about what may have happened.

I do have a problem with you stating your opinions, or Nakamoto’s, as fact.

Unless there is non-stop, unedited video from Reggie’s until she is let out, then there is no proof of what happened. There is just testimony and opinion.

So, when someone says she was dumped on Burbank, you are wrong to say they are wrong. You would be right to say that we don’t know that, because we don’t.

There are very few known facts in this case.

quote:

---

I don’t know what he saw and neither do you.

---

He comes out publicly and says what he saw. It holds a little more weight than an anonymous post at least. His job is at least somewhat predicated on sharing facts. I get that isn’t the standard these days nationally and apparently people have issues with his integrity but there’s no real reason to think he would lie about them going to three different addresses. As far as us seeing actual evidence being the only way to know something as fact, then we can throw out pretty much everything except the 15 second video by that standard. We wouldn’t even be able to trust the affidavit if that’s the standard since it’s also a summary of evidence viewed and it’s technically second hand information.

I was summarizing a conversation on a topic and basically saying she’s likely wrong. How the frick is that weird?

ETA: and whether people want to admit it or not, Angel’s had some details that we heard from other sources later even if how she shared them was questionable and when she got some corroboration she did a victory lap.

quote:

---

I was watching the fricking TV in bed after the LSU game and Mr Cracker starts messaging asking about Angel. 10 minutes later she's blowing up the FB messages because he's talking about her kids here.

---

how is this a defense to anything I said

She is “sharing” stuff that the defendants and their lawyers are putting out. That doesn’t prove any of it is factual

Madi can’t argue against it so they can just keep saying whatever they want and deem it as factual amongst themselves for now.

quote:

---

She is “sharing” stuff that the defendants and their lawyers are putting out. That doesn’t prove any of it is factual

---

Nope. Just that there’s some corroboration.

quote:

---

Madi can’t argue against it so they can just keep saying whatever they want and deem it as factual amongst themselves for now.

---

Yep. I made pretty much the same comment earlier in the thread. That her being unable to give her side of things is beneficial to them.

quote:

---

I have no reason to think he is lying. But watching snippets of edited or incomplete video only allows a person knowledge of what was seen in that exact moment.

---

I said it already… I have no idea how you would manipulate them bringing her to 3 different places she asked to be. Can you?

quote:

---

The crazy LP mom that blew up the thread today shows a potential surprisingly pro-defense juror: the white travel ball-type mother of multiple boys.

---

Strong personalities like that usually show themselves in voir dire. They can’t help it. And because of that, they don’t usually make the jury.

Judges will be inclined to grant cause challenges because a shite stirrer on the jury is a pain in the arse.