Started By
Message

re: Darwin’s Doubt: the mathematical problem of evolution and DNA

Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:02 am to
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128092 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:02 am to
quote:

From what?



Again the theory does not address this, but there have been substantial advancements in abiogenesis research recently

You should read about them even if you are a creationist. Some of these experiments are pretty fascinating

You can also just believe god put in place the building blocks of life and then things evolved.
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
1730 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:02 am to
quote:

where are we? Minneapolis?


A deity created life. Prove it's your Christian deity instead of the Muslim deity.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
20214 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:03 am to
quote:

You're right. Evolution is false. A superior being created life, and the being sent his word to Mohammad through the Qu'ran.


Getting warmer. Great tee shot. Terrible putting.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128092 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:05 am to
quote:

A lot of scientists have found the time frame from the Big Bang to now to be inadequate for evolution to have worked


You misunderstand what some of them are saying, a great deal
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46835 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:06 am to
quote:

I do not know, nor does the theory of evolution address abiogenesis
it may very well be that the chemistry for biogenesis just "is"...its baked into the matter itself, where simple chemistry becomes complex chemistry as a matter of course given proper conditions. what we are finding is that complex inorganic and organic chemistry is the rule not the exception. whether that leads to life is due to the randomness of environment.

so how did evolution "start"? it never started, it has always been. if thats God, so be it
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25231 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:06 am to
I wish Carl Sims would do his evolutionary creatures again with the power of current computers rather than those of 30 to 40 years ago.

Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
1730 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Getting warmer. Great tee shot. Terrible putting.


Got it. No explanation/proof of why one deity is the true answer, over another.



Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62557 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:09 am to
quote:

From what?


From an earlier homo species.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
25207 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:15 am to
quote:

so then what does?


What does this question have to do with the plausibility/possibility of macroevolution?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128092 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:21 am to
quote:

What does this question have to do with the plausibility/possibility of macroevolution?



There is no difference between "macro" and "micro" evolution
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149519 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:23 am to
Just curious I guess
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
10990 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:24 am to
quote:

There absolutely is not

Brilliant analysis. Astute observation. Salient point. You've convinced us all. How can anyone doubt all that analysis, data, or other observation?

What is anyone supposed to do with a comment like this?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85417 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:26 am to
quote:

How can anyone doubt all that analysis, data, or other observation?


curious to know why you would expect this from him, but you offered none with your comment?
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
59007 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Ben Shapiro

Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46835 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Brilliant analysis. Astute observation. Salient point. You've convinced us all. How can anyone doubt all that analysis, data, or other observation?

this is an LSU-centric sports message board not a peer review.
Posted by NorCali
Member since Feb 2015
1587 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:27 am to
quote:

What does this question have to do with the plausibility/possibility of macroevolution?


Because Humans can not exist in a Descartes manner of "I think therefore I am" sort of way because we ponder.
Darwinism requires the acceptance of no "creator" because it exists as a way to fill the void but can not stand up to scrutiny.
Case and point, the initial step in the "primordial ooze" is the self-manifestation of a bioactive polymer (Amino Acid peptide or RNA) but no one knows which one because every attempt to duplicate this spontaneous formation of the actual building blocks of the polymer in a lab have utterly failed, so the key initial creation step must be accepted on "Faith", which is quite the delicious irony...
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
69160 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:28 am to
Anyone see Brett Weinstein's latest discussion on Rogan? He goes into his thoughts here. I got the gist but couldn't repeat it intelligently. Something about genes or DNA testing variable changes that may better explain the "macro" jumps.
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
10990 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:29 am to
quote:

curious to know why you would expect this from him, but you offered none with your comment?

I did in the comment he responded with nothingness to. For the "smart" people, atheists sure are smug retards.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128092 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Darwinism


No such thing, a word designed to equate the theory of evolution with creationism, and make it seem like a belief structure instead of something that just is

quote:

requires the acceptance of no "creator"


Absolutely not true. There is such a thing as Theistic Evolution, and many religious scientists think this way.

quote:

the initial step in the "primordial ooze"


Has nothing to do with evolution
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128092 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 11:31 am to
quote:


Brilliant analysis. Astute observation. Salient point. You've convinced us all. How can anyone doubt all that analysis, data, or other observation?

What is anyone supposed to do with a comment like this?


I really don't care. The point was stupid, there was no point in going into detail.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram