- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Darwin’s Doubt: the mathematical problem of evolution and DNA
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:25 am to Darth_Vader
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:25 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
But if they really do worship science, then they should adhere to the teachings of scientific method. And if thy do that, the only logical explanation is that the theory of evolution as we know it today simply cannot explain macroevolution.
muh settled science
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:30 am to Darth_Vader
Meyer has an agenda he is pushing and founder of the Discovery Institution
Just another intelligent designer pusher, plenty of stuff out there arguing counter points.
Scientific American 15 counter points
Just another intelligent designer pusher, plenty of stuff out there arguing counter points.
Scientific American 15 counter points
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:34 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Its complete nonsense. This guy has been debunked many many many times
Very lazy. “Debunked!!!”
Yeah, we’ve been through the “debunked” washateria on so many topics without merit that you’re gonna have to bring the receipts and not just spout “debunked” like it’s a magic talisman.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:36 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Its the theory of evolution, not the law of evolution.
This is a tough look
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:36 am to Jimbeaux
quote:
Very lazy. “Debunked!!!”
Here is something like the OP posted then
1 hour debunking feel free to watch
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:38 am to JohnnyKilroy
Its amazing how many people are literally hitting every single talking point just one after another in this thread
Im impressed
Im impressed
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:38 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
If you have to go to YouTube with your scientific hypothesis…you don’t have a serious scientific hypothesis
YouTube is simply the medium for publishing the information. The scientific research was done at Cambridge.
quote:
This shite has been debunked time and time again, but it isn’t a good faith argument so it never dies. Keep getting bamboozled, though.
Has it though?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:39 am to Darth_Vader
quote:Well said. Tight and gift wrapped. And no response will be given.
I know this subject will be a flashpoint for some who treat evolution more like a religion than science. But if they really do worship science, then they should adhere to the teachings of scientific method. And if thy do that, the only logical explanation is that the theory of evolution as we know it today simply cannot explain macroevolution.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:42 am to Darth_Vader
This argument is not new. In fact Carl Sagan spent a great deal of time talking about it way back in the 80s. There is much we still do not know about the mechanism of natural selection but natural selection remains the best explanation for the conditions of life that we are able to observe and more importantly, prove using the scientific method. The evidence for natural selection is overwhelming while the evidence for some other supernatural phenomena is still speculative at best
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:43 am to UltimaParadox
quote:
1 hour debunking feel free to watch
You mean agenda driven propaganda. Here’s the description form the YouTube channel you posted…
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:43 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Has it though?
Have you read any of the critiques of Meyer's work?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:44 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
This guy has been debunked many many many times
lol, debunked by who? Same debunkers who still believe in COVID, the 2020 election, and vaccine schedule?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:44 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
You mean agenda driven.
Exactly I said it was just like the OP
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 9:47 am
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:45 am to Darth_Vader
I thought most educated scientists and researchers, whether they believe in God or not, had already dismissed the theory of evolution as a legitimate reason to explain life on Earth.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:46 am to N2cars
quote:
I thought most educated scientists and researchers, whether they believe in God or not, had already dismissed the theory of evolution as a legitimate reason to explain life on Earth.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:46 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
so then what does?

Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:47 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
You mean agenda driven propaganda
Said without a hint of irony.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:47 am to N2cars
quote:
I thought most educated scientists and researchers, whether they believe in God or not, had already dismissed the theory of evolution as a legitimate reason to explain life on Earth.
What in the world?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:49 am to Darth_Vader
I’ve worked with Stephen on a number of occasions at Cambridge. It’s easy to write him off as “just another ID guy” from a keyboard, but continuously and presently Cambridge, Oxford, and the Royal Society do not. He’s well respected within the scientific community for such discussions.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:51 am to Mo Jeaux
How did human life form here?
Popular
Back to top



0







