- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:11 pm to jatilen
quote:
Masterson was deemed a flight risk by Judge Charlaine Olemdo
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:36 pm to stout
quote:
He was pulling a Cosby and spiking chicks drinks.
He said she said is easier to use as a defense when one person makes a claim but when 3 women all make the same claim with similar details that is pretty hard to overlook.
I would be curious to know if these ladies are still members of the church like Masterson??? That could be a big deal especially if they were testifying to get back at the church more than at Masterson. There would be a motive there to fabricate charges. Also why did they wait almost 20 years to bring charges??
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:37 pm to jatilen
Good. Isn't he a Scientologist. He can ask Xeno for help.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 8:41 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
Sucks for him , wonder if he gets that much time though.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 9:09 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
quote:Link in OP says there was video.
I’m just saying there must’ve been some video or other proof, I don’t know what else there would be in terms of convincing evidence besides video
Posted on 5/31/23 at 9:39 pm to Brosef Stalin
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:20 pm to MikeD
Not sure why this
Ignoring this case, if someone goes through a trial, and the jury can decide either way, it seems absurd to allow the government to get a do over. Doesn’t sound like beyond a reasonable doubt to me.
quote:gets downvotes.
If he went through a trial and jury couldn’t vote to convict, how is it constitutional to have a do over?
quote:
In the previous trial, that jury was unable to come to consensus on any of the trio of charges
Ignoring this case, if someone goes through a trial, and the jury can decide either way, it seems absurd to allow the government to get a do over. Doesn’t sound like beyond a reasonable doubt to me.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:27 pm to MikeD
A mistrial or hung jury, meaning no decision reached, doesn’t consist of a verdict. Therefore, the state has the option of a new trial if they feel their case is strong enough.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:29 pm to This GUN for HIRE
quote:
If he didn't do it, they wouldn't have gone through with the criminal process & he would've just payed them off.
Beings the women stuck it out makes me think he's guilty af
Whaaaaaaaat??? There were no negative ramifications if they stuck it out or not. Using that as your litmus test of truth is ridiculous.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:35 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:Yep. And no doubt they are plenty woke themselves, just not lovin' it when it actually has teeth that bites THEIR arse.
They're stunned that their celebrity bubble didn't insulate them from real world consequences. Too bad so sad.
Wasn't there also an Oscars where people like Hanks and Streep gave tearful homages to Polanski?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 1:22 am to SoFla Tideroller
Alot of guys have paid off women and not gone to jail/trial. The women were just after money & some lying.
I've been involved in a similar situation with a guy who was falsely accused.
My point is I don't believe they are lying because most women who do, just take the money and run. They don't even bother with criminal charges.
I've seen it.
I've been involved in a similar situation with a guy who was falsely accused.
My point is I don't believe they are lying because most women who do, just take the money and run. They don't even bother with criminal charges.
I've seen it.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 4:18 am to jatilen
quote:
retrial began on April 24 and wrapped on May 12 with the defense calling no witnesses. Closing arguments started on May 16 and conclude early on May 17
They deliberated almost 2 weeks. Was there someone dragging it out?
Why are the Statute of limitations so long on this? Were ssomeone the victims minors when it happened?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 5:22 am to jatilen
Wait, LA still has jails and court system?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 6:05 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Looks like Red Forman was right about him being trouble.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 6:07 am to WylieTiger
quote:
What a loser. You’re a famous tv actor and you have to spike drinks to get laid.
Bill Cosby says "Hold my Jell-O pudding!"
Posted on 6/1/23 at 6:34 am to MikeD
quote:
Ignoring this case, if someone goes through a trial, and the jury can decide either way, it seems absurd to allow the government to get a do over. Doesn’t sound like beyond a reasonable doubt to me.
Double jeopardy only attaches if the jury actually makes the finding of “not guilty.” Constitution and whatnot.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:55 am to jatilen
After 17-19 years with no physical evidence!?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 7:59 am to jatilen
quote:
Yep. I don't if he's actually guilty but if you are a defendant in one of these cases in NYC or LA, the jury is going to convict you. Muh feelings will override any facts presented at trial.
Uhh…. Hasn’t he already had one hung jury?
Some of you guys just say some dumb shite.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 8:04 am to jatilen
It’s impossible for a defendant to get a fair trial when the alleged rape victim waits decades to come forward. The statute of limitations is either long or doesn’t exist for these charges, and it’s a he said she said trial every time with no physical evidence. The defendant has to prove his innocence.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News