- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Daniel Perry Trial - Man who shot Austin protestor. Verdict Guilty. Abbot seeking pardon
Posted on 3/30/23 at 4:09 pm to SUB
Posted on 3/30/23 at 4:09 pm to SUB
Update from today:
Wow. How is this person not charged with anything. Shooting at a car driving away to "mark it" and to protect herself?
quote:
Daisy also saw Perry’s car pull forward into the crowd of protesters, heard the gunshots go off and then watched the car speed off. Daisy was carrying a pistol at the time and shot three rounds of bullets at Perry’s car as it sped off. When asked why, Daisy, who uses they/them pronouns, said they wanted to mark the vehicle for future investigations and protect themselves and the other protesters.
Wow. How is this person not charged with anything. Shooting at a car driving away to "mark it" and to protect herself? 
1
Posted on 3/30/23 at 4:21 pm to SUB
Yeah you don't get to shoot at someone who is no longer a threat.
Posted on 3/30/23 at 4:23 pm to SUB
quote:
Daniel Perry Trial - Man who shot Austin protestor who approached car with AR
quote:
Protestor (now dead) was interviewed, bragging about his AR before he was shot
It was an AK
Posted on 3/30/23 at 4:26 pm to SUB
We are all screwed if they are prosecuting a guy for defending himself when an AK-47 is pointed at him in a threatening manner
We are all screwed
We are all screwed
Posted on 3/30/23 at 4:31 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
We are all screwed if they are prosecuting a guy for defending himself when an AK-47 is pointed at him in a threatening manner
If you haven't been paying attention, Progressives are setting up a system where they have an entirely different set of laws for themselves, their leaders, and their foot soldiers.
This is just another example of this.
Not to mention, WTF are pronouns being important here??!? Just another example of who is in charge and why this country can't coexist any longer. These people want you dead. If you resist, they will do everything they can to fleece and jail you.
Posted on 3/30/23 at 4:37 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
Yeah you don't get to shoot at someone who is no longer a threat.
Well, if you are a Progressive in a Progressive run city and you are shooting at the "right" person, you absolutely can. They/them will gladly tell you it is just fine!
Posted on 3/30/23 at 4:53 pm to SUB
quote:
Daisy, who is a medic and uses they/them pronouns, was the first person to get Foster's side after he was shot to provide medical aid
They didn't feel a pulse. Daisy removed Foster's shirt and saw three bullet wounds. APD was also there, assisting Daisy in attempting to resuscitate Foster.
So how many people tried to feel for a pulse? Mentions preferred pronouns before, but immediately follows using Daisy and then stating that the APD also there and assisting.
This post was edited on 3/30/23 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 3/30/23 at 5:02 pm to SUB
quote:
28-year-old Garrett Foster
Wasn't he the original "was/were" meme?
Posted on 3/30/23 at 5:40 pm to SUB
I don't remember this being brought up when it happened, but BLM rioter had a fiancé with no arms or legs?
Posted on 3/30/23 at 5:43 pm to SUB
quote:
Perry instigated the crowd
For Austin leftists, not bowing to the leftist mob equals "instigation".
Posted on 3/30/23 at 5:58 pm to SUB
quote:
The state argues Perry instigated the crowd, causing protesters to respond by hitting and kicking his car, and also screaming at him.
I mean how? His car is in the street I’m assuming. He should be the only one in the street. Nothing at all should resort in you going into the street as a mob and kicking someone’s vehicle.
Posted on 3/30/23 at 6:05 pm to SUB
Lol there is a peak old comment in the interview video you posted.
“Imagine losing your life for something that doesn’t exist”
“Imagine losing your life for something that doesn’t exist”
Posted on 3/30/23 at 7:15 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
You can't walk up to someone and point weapons at them in an intimidating way, and then claim murder that isn't self defense from the other person.
I don’t know much about this case but from reading into it after seeing this thread, it appears the state is trying to say Foster never actually raised his weapon. They’ve had a couple of witnesses (all protesters, mind you) state that he had the barrel pointed at the ground the entire time.
Not sure how/if that can be reconciled with the grainy photo in the OP. But that seems to be their argument.
Some of the protesters apparently told police that he did raise his rifle, though, then changed their stories. So that seems to be the key thing being argued in the case - whether the guy pointed his rifle at Perry or whether he had it pointed down the whole time.
Posted on 3/30/23 at 7:23 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
Com’on man you are as bad as MSM for calling the rifle that!
They didn’t teach y’all these “”””””” in Oxford?
Posted on 3/30/23 at 7:44 pm to SUB
This trial is proof that woke DA's in progressive cities and counties will prosecute anyone whose acts deviate from the allowed narrative, regardless of the facts or circumstances of said incidents. I don't think any sane prosecutor in almost any jurisdiction would think twice about prosecuting this case.
Posted on 3/30/23 at 8:20 pm to SUB
The Austin DA at the time of the incident refused to indict Perry. A Soros DA was elected and immediately indicted Perry. Soros DAs soft on crime except when a conservative stands up to an Antifa/BLM crowd threatening to lynch him. Political prosecution.
Posted on 3/30/23 at 8:34 pm to lostinbr
quote:
So that seems to be the key thing being argued in the case - whether the guy pointed his rifle at Perry or whether he had it pointed down the whole time.
I haven’t seen any pictures that show he had it pointed at the driver, but…does one have to wait until a man with a rifle points a gun at your face (and shoots?) until you can defend yourself? I know you aren’t staying otherwise, but I’m just curious how this will play out. Clearly, the answer is no. But with people beating on your car, and a man with a gun ready to shoot you, I’m sure that will factor in.
Posted on 3/30/23 at 8:39 pm to BugAC
Apparently “Daisy” wanted in on some action too:
Daisy was carrying a pistol at the time and shot three rounds of bullets at Perry’s car as it sped off. When asked why, Daisy, who uses they/them pronouns, said they wanted to mark the vehicle for future investigations and protect themselves and the other protesters.
Daisy was carrying a pistol at the time and shot three rounds of bullets at Perry’s car as it sped off. When asked why, Daisy, who uses they/them pronouns, said they wanted to mark the vehicle for future investigations and protect themselves and the other protesters.
Posted on 3/30/23 at 8:42 pm to SUB
Dude has a better justified case than Rittenhouse. This should have never made it to court.
An armed ANTIFA POS FAFO\story. Periodt!
An armed ANTIFA POS FAFO\story. Periodt!
Posted on 3/30/23 at 8:48 pm to SUB
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News