- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:14 am to jlc05
quote:
A 0.5% mortality rate equates to about 16500 deaths
Nothing
Burger
With a side of nothing fries topped with stupid people
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 10:15 am
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:15 am to Paige
[img]Qhttps://i.postimg.cc/c1pjBXgM/IMG-2760.jpg[/img]
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:15 am to jlc05
quote:
A 0.5% mortality rate equates to about 16500 deaths
So fewer than the yearly flu cycle?
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:15 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
This is kind of embarassing
Jack Ma about to make the US look like fools
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:16 am to Salmon
quote:
it shows 30 deaths in a week
be sure to get this right, we don't want to cause too much of a panic
Let's not forget that over 20 of those came from a single nursing home.
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:16 am to RB10
quote:Yep. Right in line with the annual RSV cycle
So fewer than the yearly flu cycle?
Although the RSV cycle has 3% of its deaths as children under 5, so not as worrisome as the elderly
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 10:17 am
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:17 am to jlc05
quote:
A 0.5% mortality rate equates to about 16500 deaths
6k more than Swine Flu
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:17 am to RB10
quote:
Let's not forget that over 20 of those came from a single nursing home.
We know.
But thanks for the reminder.
I was about to go out and buy more TP, but your reminder stopped me.
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:18 am to SaintsandTigers
quote:
Its actually not. About a 90% chance it doesn’t develop into something worse than flu like for a 72 year old
But don’t let that fact get in the way of anything
I expressed hope for a persons health and admitted I was guessing.
If your number is correct, I think a 10% chance it could develop into something more serious is high compared to the under 60 population.
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:18 am to Salmon
quote:
but it will probably come back next fall though
And people will adjust and figure out the world will spin on.
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:18 am to Salmon
quote:I think I like. I disagree with you, but you don’t seem like a pussy at least
We know.
But thanks for the reminder.
I was about to go out and buy more TP, but your reminder stopped me.
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:18 am to RB10
quote:
Let's not forget that over 20 of those came from a single nursing home.
What do people like you not comprehend? Yes, it impacts the elderly far worse than you or I but the idea behind all the precautions is so that we don't accidentally spread it to the elderly. I guess it will take your own mother or father contracting the virus to appreciate the gravity of the situation.
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:19 am to Unknown_Poster
quote:And I guess it will take your own child getting RSV and dying to care
What do people like you not comprehend? Yes, it impacts the elderly far worse than you or I but the idea behind all the precautions is so that we don't accidentally spread it to the elderly. I guess it will take your own mother or father contracting the virus to appreciate the gravity of the situation.
STOP WITH THE EMOTIONAL STRAWMAN POON TANG
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:20 am to Unknown_Poster
quote:
What do people like you not comprehend? Yes, it impacts the elderly far worse than you or I but the idea behind all the precautions is so that we don't accidentally spread it to the elderly. I guess it will take your own mother or father contracting the virus to appreciate the gravity of the situation.
People like me understand that tanking the economy over the equivalent to the flu is a bad idea.
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:20 am to SaintsandTigers
Your posting history indicates an obvious troll, just keep howling at the moon.
This is not the equivalent of the flu -- it's clearly far more communicable. But facts be damned.
quote:
People like me understand that tanking the economy over the equivalent to the flu is a bad idea.
This is not the equivalent of the flu -- it's clearly far more communicable. But facts be damned.
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 10:21 am
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:21 am to Salmon
quote:
We know.
But thanks for the reminder.
Good. Maybe now we can stop pretending that this is some sort of super virus.
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:21 am to Unknown_Poster
I am not trolling in the least
Giving a death a face to make people emotional is not how you make decisions for a nation, so stop doing it
Speeding in your car can kill someone. It could kill your mom. Yet you still speed because statically the odds are very low
Giving a death a face to make people emotional is not how you make decisions for a nation, so stop doing it
Speeding in your car can kill someone. It could kill your mom. Yet you still speed because statically the odds are very low
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 10:23 am
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:22 am to Unknown_Poster
quote:
This is not the equivalent of the flu -- it's clearly far more communicable. But facts be damned.
If it's far more communicable, then it's far less deadly than even that .5% mortality rate projection says.
Posted on 3/13/20 at 10:22 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Heat and humidity reduce spread
quote:
This paper investigates how air temperature and humidity influence the transmission of COVID-19. After estimating the serial interval of COVID-19 from 105 pairs of the virus carrier and the infected, we calculate the daily effective reproductive number, R, for each of all 100 Chinese cities with more than 40 cases. Using the average R from January 21 to 23, 2020 as a proxy of non-intervened transmission intensity, we find, under a linear regression framework for 100 Chinese cities, high temperature and high relative humidity reduce the transmission of COVID-19 with a significance level of 1% and 5%, respectively, even after controlling for population density and GDP per capita of cities. One degree Celsius increase in temperature and one percent increase in relative humidity lower R by 0.0266 and 0.0106, respectively. This result is consistent with the fact that the high temperature and high humidity significantly reduce the transmission of influenza. It indicates that the arrival of summer and rainy season in the northern hemisphere can effectively reduce the transmission of the COVID-19.
Pre print article
I want to come back to this study again. I decided to dig a little bit into the study. It's still good and encouraging, but I want to caution people to temper expectations.
The reason I say that is that in the study is that they only got temperatures between 0 and 20 degrees celcius inside of China, which is 32-68 fahrenheit. We don't know for sure that additional increases in temperature will have the same effect or not. It's possible that it'll die off at even faster rate at higher temps, or that it'll kind of "cap" at a certain point and temperature not affect it much more than we see in the study. Either way, that study does do a good job of showing that we do see a slower spread in warmer temps and that is ultimately a good thing for the USA, but we just don't know how anything above 68 degrees Fahrenheit will affect the virus' spread. We still have no data to show that the virus dies off in high temps.
This post was edited on 3/13/20 at 10:26 am
Popular
Back to top


3






