Started By
Message

re: Comet 67P (Rosetta flew behind his one) compared to Los Angeles

Posted on 4/8/19 at 7:54 am to
Posted by SLafourche07
Member since Feb 2008
10055 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 7:54 am to
quote:

the universe is infinite

quote:

The probability



If a data set is infinite wouldn't every probability repeat?
Posted by Loaner1231
Violet, LA
Member since Jan 2016
3903 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 8:32 am to
quote:

If a data set is infinite wouldn't every probability repeat?


Posted by Crow Pie
Neuro ICU - Tulane Med Center
Member since Feb 2010
27936 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 9:00 am to
quote:

So it is likely there is other intelligent life out there.
I have not seen more intelligent life walking across the quad.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48835 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 9:20 am to
The real question is what good will surveillance do for something that large if it is on a collision course?

Send up Bruce Willis, Ben Affleck and his rag-tag drilling team to detonate a nuclear warhead in the middle of it?

The only thing an early warning system would do is create mass chaos leading up to the impact,

Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31590 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Longer term MO will be to control space and defend against other countries and extraterrestrial threats.



There will be no extraterrestrial threats to guard against and out government shouldn’t be wasting money to guard against it. The closest there might be is if we discover microbes on Mars or something, bring them back to Earth, and then our bodies can’t defend against it so there’s a pandemic.

There won’t be spaceships zipping around with lasers either. At most some sort of unmanned orbital weapons delivery systems. Every explosion or wrecked satellite causes significant long term problems for development of space. NASA spoke up about India’s destruction of a satellite making the statement that its wholly unsustainable because of the debris it creates.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31590 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 9:27 am to
quote:

The real question is what good will surveillance do for something that large if it is on a collision course?


If you know something is going to hit in ten years you can react. If you know something is going to hit in ten months you can react but it’s harder. If ten days, oh well.

There are ways to prevent collision but we need to be developing the tech now, not at the last minute.
Posted by AUTimbo
Member since Sep 2011
3372 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 10:11 am to
quote:

There already is one and I've met a guy who works for it.


Tony Stark or Clark Kent?
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
10130 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 10:28 am to
quote:

There will be no extraterrestrial threats to guard against and out government shouldn’t be wasting money to guard against it. 


I meant asteroids and comets, whichever term can be used for those.
Posted by Got Blaze
Youngsville
Member since Dec 2013
10189 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 10:36 am to
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
17154 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Or we don't have the right resources.


I would imagine water would be pretty high on the needed resources list since it's seems to be so scarce. But in general all resources would be sought after if your were traveling across the universe wouldn't you think?
Posted by Pvt Hudson
Member since Jan 2013
4981 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:30 am to


How does something that small generate enough gravity to keep those rocks from flinging off?
Posted by LSUWoodworker
St George "God's Country "
Member since Dec 2007
18878 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:32 am to
quote:

What was that rock a harvard scientist said was from an alien culture?


You are thinking of the Obamastone It is dick shaped
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
70467 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:42 am to
quote:

How does something that small generate enough gravity to keep those rocks from flinging off?





Dumb human, you have no concept of size

Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24621 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 11:55 am to
quote:

If you know something is going to hit in ten years you can react. If you know something is going to hit in ten months you can react but it’s harder. If ten days, oh well.



So this thread has spurred talk of the Space Force, asteroids, extraterrestrial life and light years. So if humans save their azzes by deflecting one object, that's great. But a philosophical question: In saving ourselves from these threats, what is your vision of how long humans are going to continue on this planet. Are you thinking 250 years, 2000 years or 2,000,000 years. Man it all changes over time so I doubt humans can be saved in the long run. It's foolish to think we have some sort of control on that. Sorry, that's just how it is. The earth is not here because of humans. We are here because of the earth.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31590 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 12:11 pm to
There’s no real answer I can give, who knows. We may nuke ourselves tomorrow. Or the Yellowstone super volcano erupts. But what we can do is work (preferably the global community contributes) to prevent a very real and very dangerous threat from the earth be impacted by an asteroid/comet. That’s one less cataclysmic event to destroy humanity which hopefully helps tack on some years for us.

Ultimately I think man destroys itself, and my guess is within the next thousand years. And yes I do think mankind destroying the habit on which it resides via polluting it and accelerating the aptmospheric change destroys it.
This post was edited on 4/8/19 at 12:13 pm
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 1:28 pm to
To project what’s in the future, we have to look at the past. The human past includes approximately 4.1 billion years of evolution. Over that period we have evolved from the simplest life form to the most advanced.

We have reached the limits of biological evolution. Humans cannot migrate from earth in our current form. We have colonized the entire planet because we can reshape the environment to suit our needs. We can’t do that in space.

However, the evolutionary gift that has caused us to completely dominate earth will also send our offspring into the Universe. Not our biological offspring, though. Rather, it will be the artificial intelligence we create that will represent us.

We’re already launching rudimentary AI into our solar system on discovery missions. Soon AI will be so advanced that it will design itself for interstellar travel. We will, in effect, create our successor species that will explore the Universe.

Again looking to the past, we can see a slow transition that took 3 billion years for single cell organisms to evolve into multicellular creatures. Then it took hundreds of millions of years for a technological intelligence to evolve, humans.

Now, some three hundred thousand years later, our technological abilities are creating AI. From an objective viewpoint, this is a natural progression of evolution. Biological life is becoming metalogical life, or what we now call artificial intelligence. Only metalogical life can traverse space’s great distances between worlds to continue the spread of intelligence in the Universe.
Posted by Fe_Mike
Member since Jul 2015
3884 posts
Posted on 4/8/19 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

In this unfathomably vast universe, that we are the most advanced life forms amongst billions of light years of space. That is what's truly dumb.


I mean...somebody's gotta be #1. Why not us?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram