- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Class Action Lawsuit For Sunshine Bridge Fiasco
Posted on 10/16/18 at 9:53 am
Posted on 10/16/18 at 9:53 am
Just wondering if all the motorists who travel the bridge daily for work, business, etc. can recoup extra expenses they will incur from the barge company in a class action lawsuit?
It doesn't effect me personally but I feel for those who will be impacted by this calamity. I think they are entitled for compensation due to the inconvenience and extra money they will surely spend for driving way out of the way. After all, didn't a woman get a big reward from McDonald's once for being too stupid to realize that her coffee she just purchased was hot?
It doesn't effect me personally but I feel for those who will be impacted by this calamity. I think they are entitled for compensation due to the inconvenience and extra money they will surely spend for driving way out of the way. After all, didn't a woman get a big reward from McDonald's once for being too stupid to realize that her coffee she just purchased was hot?
25
Posted on 10/16/18 at 9:55 am to Lutcher Lad
You've come to the right place
Posted on 10/16/18 at 9:57 am to Lutcher Lad
It's so awesome that you are being serious
Posted on 10/16/18 at 9:58 am to Lutcher Lad
I’m loving not having to drive through traffic on LA-70 every day. To and from work is going to be a breeze for a little while. I’ll enjoy it.
Posted on 10/16/18 at 9:59 am to Lutcher Lad
I've read here about something called the Jones act. Anyone care to explain why the Jones act exists? I know it's probably to protect the barge operators and what not but why do they deserve protecting if they take down a bridge?
Posted on 10/16/18 at 9:59 am to Lutcher Lad
quote:no
Just wondering if all the motorists who travel the bridge daily for work, business, etc. can recoup extra expenses they will incur from the barge company in a class action lawsuit?
quote:typical...... Age of Entitlement.
I think they are entitled for compensation due to the inconvenience and extra money they will surely spend for driving way out of the way.
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:00 am to Lutcher Lad
fricking scum bag lawyers are why no companies want to do business in this state!
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:00 am to Lutcher Lad
quote:
After all, didn't a woman get a big reward from McDonald's once for being too stupid to realize that her coffee she just purchased was hot?
Not how that went down at all
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:00 am to boosiebadazz
Gordon personally chased away the second Amazon headquarters.
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:01 am to NIH
If you hear my boy Sentrius tell it...
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:02 am to boosiebadazz
Fact......
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:03 am to Lutcher Lad
I am curious about the sugarcane truck drivers.
They get paid by the number of loads of sugarcane they are able to deliver, now that many of them have to go around, I am sure it is costing them big time. Friday, I saw about 6 or 7 sugarcane trucks hauling arse down HWY 1 towards Donaldsonville.
They get paid by the number of loads of sugarcane they are able to deliver, now that many of them have to go around, I am sure it is costing them big time. Friday, I saw about 6 or 7 sugarcane trucks hauling arse down HWY 1 towards Donaldsonville.
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:03 am to jlovel7
quote:
I've read here about something called the Jones act. Anyone care to explain why the Jones act exists? I know it's probably to protect the barge operators and what not but why do they deserve protecting if they take down a bridge?
The Jones Act is a federal law that allows offshore/maritime workers (seamen) to sue their employees for being injured on the job
I'm not sure how it would protect barge operators who rammed into a bridge
There may be some provision somewhere in the Jones Act that Barge operators could rely on to mitigate their damages, but I admittedly do not know about it
This post was edited on 10/16/18 at 10:06 am
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:03 am to magildachunks
quote:
Not how that went down at all
Please enlighten us.
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:04 am to boosiebadazz
Weird how he disappeared once that Briggs deposition was posted
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:04 am to Lutcher Lad
Has anyone called Domino's to see if they'll fix it?
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:05 am to Lutcher Lad
quote:
After all, didn't a woman get a big reward from McDonald's once for being too stupid to realize that her coffee she just purchased was hot?
It was the Liebeck v. McDonald's case. You should read it
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:05 am to NIH
Had a phone call with Stephen Wags to get his rebuttal talking point
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:05 am to Lutcher Lad
I'm sure there will be lawsuits. I don't think it should apply to the motorist who are just pissed off, but if this drags on a long time, small businesses will suffer and may close. They should be compensated in some way.
Posted on 10/16/18 at 10:06 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Has anyone called Domino's to see if they'll fix it?
Page 1 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News