Started By
Message

re: Clancy trial verdict predictions

Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:04 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
113196 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:04 pm to
Then why does the prosecution not want that juror gone if your guess is so good?

I originally thought thr same as you , we were both clearly likely wrong considering how both sides reacted to the lone juror
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 3:06 pm
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89565 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Then why does the prosecution not want that juror gone if your guess is so good?


Because them pushing for the removal could be grounds for an appeal maybe? They also most likely would love to retry this case. Win win for them.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88492 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:07 pm to
Prosecutions have a better chance at retrials than defense when they decide to retrial.
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
148138 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:08 pm to
Court back in session
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
148138 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:10 pm to
Jury finished for day... deliberations resume at 9 AM ET tomorrow
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
1584 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:14 pm to
So, she’s either gonna be found guilty of murder, or innocent because of insanity, correct? Like Andrea Yates? Andrea Yates is still locked up in a mental institution. Is that what we’re looking at here? We’re not looking at her walking out the door, right?
Posted by ShrimperDan
Fernandina
Member since Jul 2026
282 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Literally all you needed to say. He's guessing. Logically speaking one person holding out of reasonable doubt points to one dummy thinking any doubt is reasonable doubt. But Red knows this jury is going to be the best shot he will get at a favorable outcome for his client, so he's pushing to get it done now instead of a mistrial.



A less likely but possible situation is that the holdout is actually insisting on NGRI.

The rest might have agreed to a lesser charge that he is ok with. He wants to get it done now with this jury because the prosecution will be able to come back and improve their case while the defense really can't. There is no other way you can spin the defense other than the way they did it IMO.

Like I said, I don't think that situation is likely necessarily but it is possible.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88175 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Yall are crazy
Y'all?
Posted by STigers
Gulf Coast
Member since Nov 2022
4467 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:18 pm to
If she is found NGRI because of postpartum psychosis then I believe they better start removing children from some households for their own protection
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
1584 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:19 pm to
This already happened with Andrea Yates. Why is everything in such an up war about this? I’m guessing because that was 20 years ago? Because of the Internet? This is nothing new.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 3:21 pm
Posted by ConnectTheDots
Member since May 2026
223 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:21 pm to
“Men can’t have an opinion on postpartum depression because they will never give birth or understand what women go through”

So are these feminists literally admitting that a man can’t be a woman?
Posted by Jay31
Member since Aug 2024
563 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:32 pm to
Time is a flat circle
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
1584 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Time is a flat circle
nobody cared about it back then like they do now. I think that’s the most interesting thing about the case. It’s not the outcome. It’s the people on both sides having no understanding of what the frick is going on and just running with shite. It’s fricking crazy. People thinking if she’s found innocent means she’s going to walk out the door.

If it were my choice, she would be found guilty and go to jail. I don’t care how crazy you are, you kill your kids you need to go to prison. You need to be in the worst environment. But people need to understand that she’s not gonna be walking out the door and this is nothing new.
Posted by Jay31
Member since Aug 2024
563 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

People thinking if she’s found innocent means she’s going to roll out the door.


FIFY
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80866 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

But people need to understand that she’s not gonna be walking out the door and this is nothing new.


There is a mechanism that she could be free in a year if found NGRI.

Highly unlikely, but possible.
Posted by Breauxsif
Member since May 2012
23482 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

So, she’s either gonna be found guilty of murder, or innocent because of insanity, correct? Like Andrea Yates? Andrea Yates is still locked up in a mental institution. Is that what we’re looking at here? We’re not looking at her walking out the door, right?

Even if the jury ultimately returns a verdict of not guilty by reason of mental illness, it does not mean she walks free. A verdict of not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility from what I have read regarding Mass law typically results in continued confinement and treatment at a secure psychiatric facility. Clancy would not be immediately released.
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
1584 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:49 pm to
And that to me would be worth uproar definitely. I don’t like that she would be going to a mental institution and I don’t like that there would be any chance that she would get out at all. So I understand that. But people need to understand that nobody just walks out of the courtroom after they do something like this. Highly unlikely yes. Like, less than 1%. Andrea is still in confinement from 2006. I just want everyone to understand that.

What is new about this case is the women going crazy on TikTok. But the case itself, this is all pretty normal.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 3:51 pm
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78418 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

But people need to understand that she’s not gonna be walking out the door and this is nothing new.

She could be out of the mental institution in under 5 years for murdering her 3 children.

Andrea Yates is still in the institution because she refuses to leave, if I remember correctly.

NGRI doesn’t mean she spends her life confined, although it absolutely should.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 3:53 pm
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
1584 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:53 pm to
She chooses not to do the hearing. But she’s not able to leave. She can choose to do the hearing if she wants. to see if she’s allowed to leave. She chooses to not even bother with it. I wonder why?
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 3:54 pm
Posted by sports101
Member since Aug 2014
1201 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

So, she’s either gonna be found guilty of murder, or innocent because of insanity, correct? Like Andrea Yates? Andrea Yates is still locked up in a mental institution. Is that what we’re looking at here? We’re not looking at her walking out the door, right?


She ain't WALKING out anywhere!
Jump to page
Page First 27 28 29 30 31
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 29 of 31Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram