2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clancy trial verdict predictions
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:35 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:35 pm to lsupride87
There's absolutely no way 11 people are on the defenses side.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:36 pm to tylercsbn9
I mean the prosecution wants the 1 juror to stay and the defense wants the 1 juror to leave
For whatever reason they obviously both think the other 11 are voting not guilty for insanity
For whatever reason they obviously both think the other 11 are voting not guilty for insanity
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:37 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Apparently the prosecution agrees though
There's really no way of knowing. I think Red is just shooting his shot and is ready for this to be done with. I think if this were to go the mistrial route, Lindsay is gonna be hammered way more than she was in this one to really drive the point home that she's responsible. Obviously not a lawyer, so I could be way off base.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:38 pm to tylercsbn9
quote:
There's absolutely no way 11 people are on the defenses side.
Is it possible that the others agreed to a lesser charge and the one is holding out for full first degree murder? Kind of a middle ground and not straight up NGRI.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:40 pm to ShrimperDan
I mean if I was the prosecution I would have let that juror walk and take my chances
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:45 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I mean if I was the prosecution I would have let that juror walk and take my chances
If they truly believe she is definitively guilty all another trial would do is give them a chance to frame the case in a better way. The defense can't do anything differently really, the prosecution can.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:47 pm to ShrimperDan
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Sure seems they are leaning NGRI
As much as it sucks, the prosecution was so bad I think that’s the “right” verdict according to Mass law
The law sucks and the penalty sucks worse. You should still face life outside of Gen pop even if you were insane .
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:48 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Clancy’s defense attorney insinuates there is a lone juror who is holding out and refusing to find Clancy not guilty.
Again, how on Earth could he possibly know this? He also didn't say anything like that so that tweet is just clickbait nonsense, but that's another topic
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:48 pm to ShrimperDan
quote:In Karen Read's first trial, Auntie Bev declared a mistrial even though they were unaniumus on all the major charges.
Is it possible that the others agreed to a lesser charge and the one is holding out for full first degree murder? Kind of a middle ground and not straight up NGRI.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:50 pm to AlxTgr
0% chance shes convicted. Yall are crazy
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:50 pm to lsupride87
Honestly, if the hang up is the definition of reasonable doubt, it's more likely that it's a holdout that is refusing to convict clinging to ANY doubt
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:52 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:Thats what I said as well and what I hoped but the courtroom makes it appear different. I don’t know
Honestly, if the hang up is the definition of reasonable doubt, it's more likely that it's a holdout that is refusing to convict clinging to ANY doub
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:52 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Thats what I said as well and what I hoped but the courtroom makes it appear different
They
Don't
Know
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:53 pm to LNCHBOX
Of course they don’t “know”, but when the actions of both the prosecution and defense point towards the same thing, well….
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:54 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Of course they don’t “know”, but when the actions of both the prosecution and defense point towards the same thing, well….
okPosted on 9/3/26 at 2:58 pm to LNCHBOX
I mean he really is a fricking dumbass if he is fighting this hard to remove the 1 juror who is voting in favor of Clancy
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:58 pm to LNCHBOX
Jury sent home for the day
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:59 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I mean he really is a fricking dumbass if he is fighting this hard to remove the 1 juror who is voting in favor of Clancy
Give me a simple explanation how the frick he would know that though. You can't do it.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:01 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:They read jurors and the like for a living. He doesn’t know but he clearly feels that way and it’s clear the prosecution feels that way too
Give me a simple explanation how the frick he would know that though. You can't do it.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:03 pm to lsupride87
quote:
He doesn’t know
Literally all you needed to say. He's guessing. Logically speaking one person holding out of reasonable doubt points to one dummy thinking any doubt is reasonable doubt. But Red knows this jury is going to be the best shot he will get at a favorable outcome for his client, so he's pushing to get it done now instead of a mistrial.
Page 28 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News