
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clancy trial verdict predictions
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:47 pm to ShrimperDan
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:47 pm to ShrimperDan
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Sure seems they are leaning NGRI
As much as it sucks, the prosecution was so bad I think that’s the “right” verdict according to Mass law
The law sucks and the penalty sucks worse. You should still face life outside of Gen pop even if you were insane .
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:48 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Clancy’s defense attorney insinuates there is a lone juror who is holding out and refusing to find Clancy not guilty.
Again, how on Earth could he possibly know this? He also didn't say anything like that so that tweet is just clickbait nonsense, but that's another topic
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:48 pm to ShrimperDan
quote:In Karen Read's first trial, Auntie Bev declared a mistrial even though they were unaniumus on all the major charges.
Is it possible that the others agreed to a lesser charge and the one is holding out for full first degree murder? Kind of a middle ground and not straight up NGRI.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:50 pm to AlxTgr
0% chance shes convicted. Yall are crazy
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:50 pm to lsupride87
Honestly, if the hang up is the definition of reasonable doubt, it's more likely that it's a holdout that is refusing to convict clinging to ANY doubt
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:52 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:Thats what I said as well and what I hoped but the courtroom makes it appear different. I don’t know
Honestly, if the hang up is the definition of reasonable doubt, it's more likely that it's a holdout that is refusing to convict clinging to ANY doub
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:52 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Thats what I said as well and what I hoped but the courtroom makes it appear different
They
Don't
Know
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:53 pm to LNCHBOX
Of course they don’t “know”, but when the actions of both the prosecution and defense point towards the same thing, well….
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:54 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Of course they don’t “know”, but when the actions of both the prosecution and defense point towards the same thing, well….
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:58 pm to LNCHBOX
I mean he really is a fricking dumbass if he is fighting this hard to remove the 1 juror who is voting in favor of Clancy
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:59 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I mean he really is a fricking dumbass if he is fighting this hard to remove the 1 juror who is voting in favor of Clancy
Give me a simple explanation how the frick he would know that though. You can't do it.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:01 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:They read jurors and the like for a living. He doesn’t know but he clearly feels that way and it’s clear the prosecution feels that way too
Give me a simple explanation how the frick he would know that though. You can't do it.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:03 pm to lsupride87
quote:
He doesn’t know
Literally all you needed to say. He's guessing. Logically speaking one person holding out of reasonable doubt points to one dummy thinking any doubt is reasonable doubt. But Red knows this jury is going to be the best shot he will get at a favorable outcome for his client, so he's pushing to get it done now instead of a mistrial.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:04 pm to LNCHBOX
Then why does the prosecution not want that juror gone if your guess is so good?
I originally thought thr same as you , we were both clearly likely wrong considering how both sides reacted to the lone juror
I originally thought thr same as you , we were both clearly likely wrong considering how both sides reacted to the lone juror
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:06 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Then why does the prosecution not want that juror gone if your guess is so good?
Because them pushing for the removal could be grounds for an appeal maybe? They also most likely would love to retry this case. Win win for them.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:07 pm to LNCHBOX
Prosecutions have a better chance at retrials than defense when they decide to retrial.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:10 pm to rt3
Jury finished for day... deliberations resume at 9 AM ET tomorrow
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:14 pm to rt3
So, she’s either gonna be found guilty of murder, or innocent because of insanity, correct? Like Andrea Yates? Andrea Yates is still locked up in a mental institution. Is that what we’re looking at here? We’re not looking at her walking out the door, right?

Popular
Back to top



2






