0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clancy Jury Is At 11 - 1?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:25 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:25 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
If 11 out of 12 people are convinced there’s reasonable doubt, there’s reasonable doubt.
No.Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:26 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
If 11 out of 12 people are convinced there’s reasonable doubt, there’s reasonable doubt.
Thanks for showing the class why collective morality is nonsensical.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:27 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
There’s a really good chance that 3 or 4 want her free and the other 7-8 just want it over with. Happens all the time with juries.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:27 pm to msutiger
quote:
Thanks for showing the class why collective morality is nonsensical.
According that poster, all I need to do is find 11 gullible retards, and I can convict him of anything I want.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:27 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
If 11 out of 12 people are convinced there’s reasonable doubt, there’s reasonable doubt.
Spoken like a true OJ juror.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:27 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
There is no doubt that she killed those 3 children......reasonable or not.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:32 pm to GuhGuh1
Can a lawyer tell me how the defense attorney is allowed to keep berating the juror and calling out that he’s a dude?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:33 pm to GuhGuh1
Based on what was presented in the trial, I am shocked that 11 jurors thought it was reasonable that she may not have know what she was doing was wrong, when she did it.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:35 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Thank god for that one sane dude.
This bitch doctor shopped for meds and then researched how long her husband would be away for his errands. Shame she didn’t succeed in killing herself
Spent months planning this out
Only fricked up part is Patrick has to keep dealing with this bullshite
This bitch doctor shopped for meds and then researched how long her husband would be away for his errands. Shame she didn’t succeed in killing herself
Spent months planning this out
Only fricked up part is Patrick has to keep dealing with this bullshite
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:35 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Just shows how totally f'up society is these days.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:35 pm to geauxpurple
quote:
That’s all it takes is one rogue juror. That’s why Louisiana was one of the last states to implement the unanimous verdict rule.
I wish we would go back to that non unanimous system. Hung Juries and Mistrials are going to kick us in the arse one day and let a few true criminals past the legal system. Not to mention the cost of having to do the trials over again.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:38 pm to NighthawkDawg
quote:
there's a ton of evidence that Clancy was going through psychosis
This woman was able to plan out and strategize more during "psychosis" than most people can when functioning completely normally. Truly impressive!
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:50 pm to DrrTiger
An emergency hearing is currently underway at the Massachusetts Appeals Court
The Defense Attorney took pot shots at the judge in his appeal briefing... bet that'll go over well in the retrial
The Defense Attorney took pot shots at the judge in his appeal briefing... bet that'll go over well in the retrial
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:53 pm to rt3
quote:
The Defense Attorney took pot shots at the judge in his appeal briefing... bet that'll go over well in the retrial
He absolutely has to shoot his shot here. He knows his client is in big trouble if they have to do this again.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:55 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
He absolutely has to shoot his shot here. He knows his client is in big trouble if they have to do this again.
I’ve only followed this casually. Why don’t think so? Was the prosecution that inept?
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:57 pm to St Augustine
quote:
Was the prosecution that inept?
Not necessarily, but they could hammer her way worse and also do a much better job of jury selection now knowing the retardation surrounding this case.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:59 pm to LNCHBOX
Imagine how queer the 2 guys that are voting not guilty are.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:59 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
If 11 out of 12 people are convinced there’s reasonable doubt, there’s reasonable doubt.
Now separately ask 12 people to define "reasonable doubt".
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:59 pm to St Augustine
I only watched a good bit of the last few weeks, but it does not seem like they did a good job. Contradicted themselves a few time and had one pretty bad “expert” but it’s up to the jurors to decide
Also, the law is kind of in the murderer’s favor as the prosecution has to prove the murderer wasn’t in a state of psychosis when the killings took place. Weird Massachusetts law. From my understanding it is not that way in other states.
Also, the law is kind of in the murderer’s favor as the prosecution has to prove the murderer wasn’t in a state of psychosis when the killings took place. Weird Massachusetts law. From my understanding it is not that way in other states.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:59 pm to St Augustine
When a solider goes to war and comes back with PTSD then commits murder what happens to them?
What’s different here?
What’s different here?
Page 12 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News