Started By
Message

re: Civil War Confederate veteran interview

Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:32 pm to
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49476 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:32 pm to
It all started because northerners began putting tomatoes in gumbo
Posted by HerkFlyer
Auburn, AL
Member since Jan 2018
3211 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

Interview with former slave of Jefferson Davis
Another interesting one I came across. There’s more slave and soldier videos if you search it up. I’m not going to get all political here. I just like hearing what they had to say


Opened this thread to see if this had been posted yet. I listen to this interview fairly regularly. It blows my mind. Fascinating perspective.
Posted by RebelExpress38
In your base, killin your dudes
Member since Apr 2012
14203 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

This is a video of a recording of a Civil War veteran in 1947.



Can you imagine fighting in the civil war and living long enough to see WWII
Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47156 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

. Any ideas where I can find the video in the OP?


I think this is it!
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
10784 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:47 pm to
That’s it! His voice is unmistakable. Thanks!
Posted by tonydtigr
Beautiful Downtown Glenn Springs,Tx
Member since Nov 2011
6395 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

Again, we’re talking human slavery, it can’t be downplayed or brushed aside.



Do you, by chance own anything made by Nike?
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60101 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

Overall slave owning Households 1860 Census:


Is that the same census that showed a freed black man was 8 times more likely to own black slaves than a white man?
Posted by Luke
1113 Chartres Street, NOLA
Member since Nov 2004
14130 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:07 pm to
Don’t hit him with the honest point blank truth… how do you expect him to ignore reality ?!?!?
Posted by STLDawg
The Lou
Member since Apr 2015
4426 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:10 pm to
One of the best overviews on this I’ve ever read. Are you a historian?
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171949 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

Michael J Cocks


Holy frick
Posted by kfaulk03
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
1494 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 5:45 am to
quote:

They built all these dumb statues and tried to give themselves honor for rebelling against our Country. He proudly pranced around, in his fake uniform, with his pretend rank. It is a joke.


You are describing your distaste of the subject, which is fine, but it's mostly emotional distaste as opposed to any sort of round historical discussion.

In the confederate army, which was a fairly novel concept, unit leaders were largely voted on by the troops themselves, which surprisingly worked fairly well as troops wanted self preservation and tactics and did not elect troop leaders who would just go easy on them. So no, ranks were not tossed around ceremoniously by a ruling elite within the confederate army. Also, battle awards and medals were notably absent within the CSA - this is differs from armies globally, historically, and the Union army. A confederate soldier(s) would maybe get mentioned in a general's war correspondence and that was viewed as enough. Your opinion that southern veterans wallowed in pomp and rank and self appointed glory isn't all that well supported. The middle to the end of the war, similar to WWI and many others was a pretty grim affair for civilians and enlisted. The aftermath of the war in the south was no different.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69476 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 6:37 am to
quote:

Straight from the source. The war was all about states rights.


Because there was absolutely no way Confederate veterans would deliberately misinterpret the events which led to the Civil War in the decades after they lost it. By 1947, the Lost Cause mythology was 100% developed and surviving Confederate veterans parroted the line over and over again that they weren't fighting for anything other than States' rights. Okay. The States' rights to do what?

Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
10748 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 6:42 am to
If this is the one I know, he is asked why people fought. Hint: it wasn't slavery.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69476 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 6:49 am to
quote:

If this is the one I know, he is asked why people fought. Hint: it wasn't slavery.


And he'd be right (for the most part). There were very few Confederate soldiers who themselves were exclusively fighting to protect the rights of Southerners to own slaves. However, secession came about as a direct result of an attempt to defend the institution of slavery. To deny this would be denying the very arguments the secession conventions made when they voted to secede.

Slavery was a rich man's game and rich men are the ones who send the blue collar workers to war.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Straight from the source. The war was all about states rights. Slavery was a very minor cause, if one at all. We all know the North was just as bad as the South when it came to the treatment of blacks, and to be honest, it sounds like from this guy that the blacks didn’t have it too bad back then even with slavery going on. Shows how much propaganda hammered into people for decades can completely change the perception of something.


This reads like something El Gaucho would write as a troll
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
10748 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 6:55 am to
quote:

*insert topic* was a rich man's game and rich men are the ones who send the blue collar workers to war.

A tale as old as time.

And meh on the slavery. It was the catalyst, yes. And for those rich few with slaves, that was a substantive issue. But the POINT, certainly for those doing the dying, was self governance. Something like 75/25 self governance to slavery, if that. With today's narrative you'd think it were 1/99 or 0/100.

Put it like this. Gay marriage is no different. I don't care if gay people marry. I care if 9 people in robes start declaring state policy, however.
This post was edited on 10/26/22 at 6:59 am
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 6:57 am to
quote:

No, but cherry picking some documents and making the war as only being about the slavery issue is dishonest at best, i


The Articles of Secession is basically their version of the Declaration of Independence. He isn’t referencing some notes scribbled on a napkin on a bar The document literally gives the reasons for leaving the Union
Posted by SemperFiDawg
Member since Sep 2014
4077 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 7:55 am to
This video has been taken down. Dang shame. Guess THE TRUTH didn't conform to todays wokeness.
Posted by Sayre
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Nov 2011
5754 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 8:10 am to
quote:

No, but cherry picking some document


Some documents? You mean the very documents that the enumerated the reason the states seceded? All the states that produced such documents said slavery or an issue surrounding slavery was the cause. Period.
Posted by Sayre
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Nov 2011
5754 posts
Posted on 10/26/22 at 8:14 am to
quote:

It is a fact that white Irish and poor English children were being shipped here as slaves before the African slave trade took off, and they were treated far worse, as they were cheaper for their jew masters to buy and discard.



LMAO, the Irish themselves know what you said is bullshite.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram